| Course | ADC 510 Addiction Theories and Practice |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 8 |
| Paper type | Treatment and trends paper |
| Length | About 1,006 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Psychology and Addiction Studies |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ADC 510 Module 8
Treating a Chronic Condition in a Changing Drug Supply: Lessons for a Rural Treatment System
Student Name
Psychology and Addiction Studies Program, Aspen University
ADC 510: Addiction Theories and Practice
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Treating a Chronic Condition in a Changing Drug Supply: Lessons for a Rural Treatment System
For her final report to the county behavioral health board, Priya, the graduate intern whose work runs through this course, was asked how the county's treatment system should change to meet current drug problems. The county is rural, with one outpatient program, no detoxification unit and an overdose rate above the state average. Priya, the board and the county are invented; the research is real.
Addiction as a Chronic Condition
McLellan et al. (2000) set drug dependence beside type 1 diabetes, high blood pressure and asthma. They found similarities in heritability, in the influence of personal choices and environment on onset and course and in rates of adherence to treatment and of relapse. Relapse after treatment for drug dependence was common, but not more common than symptom recurrence in the other illnesses, where patients also often failed to follow medication and lifestyle recommendations. The authors argued that drug dependence should be insured, treated and evaluated like other chronic illnesses, with continuing care and monitoring rather than single episodes of treatment judged by whether the person never uses again.
For the county, the implication is that a program offering only short episodes of treatment, after which clients are discharged, is built for the wrong kind of illness.
The Waves of the Overdose Crisis
Ciccarone (2019) described the US opioid overdose crisis as a series of overlapping waves. The first, from the 1990s, was driven by prescription opioids, as aggressive marketing and changing prescribing practices put large quantities of pills into circulation. The second, from around 2010, was driven by heroin, as efforts to curb prescribing and cheap, available heroin led many people to switch. The third, from around 2013, was driven by illicitly manufactured fentanyl, which entered the heroin supply and then other drugs. Ciccarone also pointed to an emerging fourth phase, in which stimulants such as methamphetamine and cocaine, often combined with fentanyl, were contributing to rising deaths.
Jones et al. (2018) documented the rise of the third wave. Synthetic opioids other than methadone, mostly fentanyl, were involved in a small share of US overdose deaths in 2010 and in nearly half by 2016. Fentanyl-involved deaths increasingly also involved other drugs, including heroin, cocaine and prescription opioids, a sign that fentanyl had spread through the drug supply and that many people were exposed without knowing it.
Matching Services to Trends
| Trend | What it means locally | Service |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl dominates the opioid supply | Higher overdose risk with every use; tolerance unpredictable | Low-barrier medication for opioid use disorder, started quickly; naloxone distribution |
| Fentanyl in other drugs | People who use stimulants or pills exposed unknowingly | Fentanyl test strips; outreach to people who do not use opioids |
| Rising stimulant involvement | Methamphetamine common in the county; no medication approved for it | Contingency management; counseling suited to stimulant use |
| Chronic, relapsing course | Many clients cycle in and out of care | Continuing care with check-ins and easy readmission |
| Rural distance and few providers | Long travel to care | Telehealth prescribing; mobile outreach; transport support |
Rural Barriers
Rural treatment faces particular obstacles. Distances are long, public transport is scarce and many clients lack reliable cars. Few clinicians practice locally, and those who do carry heavy caseloads. Stigma can be sharper in small communities where everyone knows whose car is parked at the clinic. Any plan for the county must address these barriers directly, through telehealth, transport support, mobile outreach and services delivered in ordinary places such as primary care offices, so that seeking help does not require a public visit to a treatment program.
What Success Would Look Like
Within a year, the county should be able to measure progress: the number of people started on medication for opioid use disorder, the share retained at ninety days, naloxone kits distributed and overdose reversals reported, overdose deaths compared with the prior year and the number of people with stimulant use receiving contingency management. These measures reflect the chronic care view: survival, engagement and improvement over time.
Workforce
None of these services is possible without people to deliver them. The county should support peer recovery specialists, who can be trained locally, and seek partnerships with primary care practices whose clinicians can prescribe medication for opioid use disorder with support from addiction specialists by telehealth. Training existing staff in contingency management is inexpensive compared with hiring new clinicians.
Recommendations
First, the county should reorganize treatment around continuing care, as McLellan and colleagues recommend, offering ongoing check-ins and easy return after relapse rather than discharge and waiting lists. Second, it should make medication for opioid use disorder available the same week a person asks, including by telehealth, given fentanyl's lethality. Third, it should expand naloxone and fentanyl test strip distribution to people who use stimulants and pills, not only opioids, reflecting the spread Jones and colleagues documented. Fourth, it should add contingency management for stimulant use, the best-supported approach where no medication exists. Fifth, it should use the person-in-environment approach from earlier in this course, coordinating treatment with housing, employment and family services, so that a client leaving a session returns to circumstances that support recovery rather than undermine it.
Reflections on the Course
This course moved from numbers to theories, biology, effects, prenatal exposure, systems, policy and treatment. The thread running through it is the person-in-environment view: addiction arises from the interaction of biology, psychology and circumstance, and responses must work at every level. The county's treatment system will be judged not by how many people it discharges abstinent but by how many it keeps alive, connected and improving over time.
Conclusion
McLellan and colleagues showed that drug dependence behaves like other chronic illnesses and should be treated with continuing care. Ciccarone traced the overdose crisis through waves now dominated by fentanyl and increasingly by stimulants, and Jones and colleagues documented fentanyl's rapid rise. For a rural county, these findings call for continuing care, rapid access to medication, broader harm reduction and services for stimulant use, coordinated across the systems in which clients live.
References
Ciccarone, D. (2019). The triple wave epidemic: Supply and demand drivers of the US opioid overdose crisis. International Journal of Drug Policy, 71, 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.01.010
Jones, C. M., Einstein, E. B., & Compton, W. M. (2018). Changes in synthetic opioid involvement in drug overdose deaths in the United States, 2010-2016. JAMA, 319(17), 1819-1821. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.2844
McLellan, A. T., Lewis, D. C., O'Brien, C. P., & Kleber, H. D. (2000). Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA, 284(13), 1689-1695. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.13.1689
ADC 510 Module 8 instructions, in plain terms
The final module of ADC 510 typically asks for a paper on treatment and emerging trends in drug use. Your Aspen course's Module 8 instructions decide the format; the county here is fictional. Explain a model of treatment, such as chronic care, with evidence, and say what it would change about how services are organized. Describe recent and emerging trends with data. Match treatment and harm reduction services to those trends. Consider the setting, such as rural areas with few providers. Draw together earlier modules, especially the systems perspective. Make recommendations a real system could act on, and list APA 7 references for each source. Name a few measures you would check after twelve months, such as overdose deaths or the share of clients still in care.
Inside the ADC 510 Module 8 example
Priya, the composite intern, writes a final report for her county board. McLellan, Lewis, O'Brien and Kleber's JAMA article compares relapse in drug dependence with relapse in other chronic illnesses. Ciccarone's International Journal of Drug Policy article traces three waves of the opioid crisis and an emerging stimulant wave. Jones, Einstein and Compton's JAMA research letter shows fentanyl's share of overdose deaths rising sharply, often with other drugs. A five-row table matches trends to services, from medication for opioid use disorder to fentanyl test strips. Recommendations include continuing care, low-barrier medication and stimulant-focused treatment. A closing reflection ties the recommendations to the course's person-in-environment thread.
Where the marks sit in the ADC 510 Module 8 rubric
Final papers earn credit for a coherent treatment model, current trends reported with data and services matched to both. This example uses the chronic illness comparison to justify continuing care rather than episodic treatment. Trends are traced with a framework and recent data. The table matches services to trends and to the rural setting, including telehealth and transport. The paper draws on earlier modules, including the person-in-environment map, which shows integration. Recommendations are specific, feasible and tied to evidence. The paper also sets measurable targets for the first year and redefines success for the county, from abstinence at discharge to people kept alive and connected, which follows directly from the chronic care model.
ADC 510 Module 8 help from the desk
Final papers often list trends without connecting them to services. For each trend, say what service responds to it. Use a model of treatment that fits the evidence, such as chronic care. Report current data with years, since the drug supply changes quickly and last year's pattern may already be out of date. Consider your setting's limits, such as distance and workforce. Draw on earlier modules to show what the course has added. Recommend what can actually be done. Revisit the trends section shortly before submitting, because overdose data and drug supply reports can change within months. Ask local outreach workers what they are seeing; they often notice new substances before official data do.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More ADC 510 and Psychology and Addiction Studies sample papers
- ADC 510 Module 1: Epidemiology of Substance Use
- ADC 510 Module 2: Theories of Addiction
- ADC 510 Module 3: Genetic and Biological Factors
- ADC 510 Module 4: Physiological and Psychological Effects
- ADC 510 Module 5: Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
- ADC 510 Module 6: Systems and Person-in-Environment Perspective
- ADC 510 Module 7: Substance Abuse Policy
- PAC 420 Module 7: Diversity and Ethics in Groups
- PAC 799A Module 4: Chapter 1: Introduction
- PAC 405 Module 1: Helping Children and the Drivers of Juvenile Substance Use
- PSY 650 Module 4: Confidentiality and Privacy
ADC 510 Module 8 questions, answered
What does ADC 510 Module 8 usually ask for?
Aspen's ADC 510 ends with treatment and emerging drug trends in this module, so a paper on treatment models and current trends with service recommendations is typical. Consult your Module 8 prompt.
Is addiction a chronic illness?
McLellan and colleagues found drug dependence similar to diabetes, hypertension and asthma in heritability, adherence and relapse rates, supporting a chronic care approach.
What are the waves of the opioid crisis?
Ciccarone describes three: prescription opioids from the 1990s, heroin from around 2010 and illicit fentanyl from around 2013, with stimulants increasingly involved.
Where can I find a free ADC 510 Module 8 sample paper?
This page has the full paper: addiction as chronic illness, the waves of the overdose crisis and services matched to trends for a rural county.
How much has fentanyl contributed to overdose deaths?
Jones, Einstein and Compton found synthetic opioids, mainly fentanyl, rose from a small share of US overdose deaths in 2010 to nearly half in 2016.