| Course | COM 230 Human Resource Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 4 |
| Paper type | Recruiting and selection plan |
| Length | About 1,010 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for COM 230 Module 4
Finding Twenty-Six Universal Bankers: A Recruiting and Selection Plan Built on Evidence
Student Name
Business Administration Program, Aspen University
COM 230: Human Resource Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Finding Twenty-Six Universal Bankers: A Recruiting and Selection Plan Built on Evidence
The workforce plan in Module 3 calls for Blue Ridge Community Credit Union to hire twenty-six universal bankers from outside over three years, about nine a year, alongside seventy current employees retrained for the role. The new hires matter because they bring skills current tellers often lack, such as lending experience or comfort teaching technology. This paper plans how Blue Ridge will find and choose them.
Whom to Recruit
The task analysis from Module 3 shows that universal bankers spend their time on cash handling, account problems, digital help and loan conversations. The strongest candidates are likely to have experience in customer service where accuracy matters, such as retail banking, pharmacy or insurance, along with patience and comfort with technology. A degree is not required.
Sources and Targeting
Breaugh (2008) reviewed research on employee recruitment and organized it around decisions employers make: whom to target, which recruitment sources to use, what message to send, which recruiters to use, how to handle site visits and when to recruit. Studies of sources have often found that employee referrals produce hires who stay longer and perform better, partly because referred applicants have more accurate expectations and partly because employees refer people they believe will fit. Breaugh also stressed that targeting, deciding which applicants to seek and where they can be found, comes before choosing methods.
Blue Ridge will use three sources: an employee referral program paying $500 after a hire's six months, a partnership with Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College's business programs and job ads that describe the role realistically. It will recruit before the spring and fall hiring peaks of local retailers.
What Attracts Applicants
Chapman et al. (2005) conducted a meta-analysis of studies on applicant attraction to organizations and job choice. They found that characteristics of the job and organization, such as pay, the work itself and the work environment, perceptions of fit with the organization, recruiter behaviors such as being personable and informative, and applicants' expectations of receiving an offer predicted attraction. Perceived fit and job and organization characteristics were among the strongest predictors.
Blue Ridge's job ads will therefore lead with what the work is like, the $17.50 starting pay, regular weekday schedules with one Saturday a month and the path to loan officer described in Module 1. Recruiters will be current universal bankers and branch managers, trained to describe the job honestly and answer questions.
Choosing Selection Methods
Schmidt and Hunter (1998) summarized eighty-five years of research on the validity of personnel selection methods for predicting job performance. General mental ability tests had high validity and low cost. Work sample tests and structured interviews had validity comparable to general mental ability. Integrity tests and conscientiousness measures added to prediction when combined with ability tests. Free-flowing interviews, calls to references and counting years on the job forecast performance less well. Blue Ridge's branch managers have relied on exactly those three. Combining general mental ability with a second valid method raised prediction substantially.
| Method | Validity in Schmidt and Hunter | Cost | Use at Blue Ridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| General mental ability test | High | Low | Short online test after application |
| Work sample | High | Moderate | Helping a mock member set up mobile banking and resolve a deposit error |
| Structured interview | High | Moderate | Six standard questions with rating guides |
| Integrity test | Moderate; adds to ability | Low | Considered for cash-handling risk |
| Unstructured interview | Lower | Moderate | Not used |
| Years of experience | Low | Low | Not used as a screen |
The Hiring Process
Applicants apply online and take a twenty-minute ability test. Those above a set score are invited for a ninety-minute visit: a work sample and a structured interview with a branch manager and a universal banker. Offers go out within three days. Blue Ridge will check the test for adverse impact against protected groups in its first year.
The Applicant's Experience
Good candidates have other options, so the process must not lose them. Applicants receive an email confirming each step and telling them when they will hear back. The visit is scheduled within a week of the test. Candidates meet a current universal banker during the visit, which serves Chapman and colleagues' finding that perceived fit drives attraction: applicants can judge whether they would like the work and the people. Candidates who are not selected after the visit receive a call rather than an email.
Fairness in the Process
Cognitive ability tests predict performance well but have shown group differences in scores that can screen out more applicants from some groups. Blue Ridge will set the test's cutoff score modestly, so it screens out only applicants unlikely to succeed, and give the work sample and structured interview more weight in final decisions. The test will be reviewed for adverse impact after the first year, and if the review shows a problem, the credit union will adjust the cutoff or replace the test with a method of similar validity and less adverse impact.
From Hire to Productive Banker
Selection is only the first step. New hires join the same twelve-week training as retrained employees, which builds relationships across the two groups. Each new hire is paired with an experienced employee for their first month.
Checking Results
Denise will compare new hires' ninety-day performance ratings and first-year retention with those of earlier teller hires. She will also check which recruitment source each hire came from and how each scored on the test, work sample and interview, so that after two hiring rounds Blue Ridge can see which sources and which methods best predicted success in its own setting. If referrals produce the strongest hires, as Breaugh's review suggests they often do, the referral bonus can be raised; if one interview question predicts nothing, it can be replaced.
Conclusion
Breaugh guides where and how Blue Ridge recruits, Chapman and colleagues show what will attract applicants and Schmidt and Hunter show which methods predict performance. Combining a referral-driven search with an ability test, work sample and structured interview gives Blue Ridge its best chance of hiring universal bankers who succeed and stay.
References
Breaugh, J. A. (2008). Employee recruitment: Current knowledge and important areas for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 18(3), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.07.003
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928-944. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262
COM 230 Module 4 instructions, in plain terms
Recruiting and selection is the Module 4 topic in COM 230, and students typically plan how an organization will attract and choose employees for a role. Your Module 4 page sets the rules; Blue Ridge and its hiring numbers are made up. Define the kind of applicants needed. Choose recruitment sources and messages. Explain what attracts applicants. Compare selection methods using evidence of validity. Design a selection process. Address fairness and the applicant's experience, including what happens after the offer. State how you would learn which parts of the process work. Cite sources in APA 7 form.
Inside the COM 230 Module 4 example
The role requires accuracy with cash, product knowledge, patience in teaching and comfort with technology, and starts at $17.50 an hour after the Module 1 pay review. Breaugh's Human Resource Management Review article summarized research on targeting, recruitment sources, recruitment messages, recruiters and site visits. Chapman, Uggerslev, Carroll, Piasentin and Jones's Journal of Applied Psychology meta-analysis examined predictors of attraction, such as job characteristics, work environment, perceived fit and recruiter personableness. Schmidt and Hunter's Psychological Bulletin article reported validity estimates for nineteen selection methods, with general mental ability, work samples and structured interviews among the highest. The methods table compares validity and cost. The process uses employee referrals and community college partnerships as sources, a job ad with a realistic preview, a short cognitive ability test, a work sample in which candidates help a mock member set up mobile banking and a structured interview.
Reading the COM 230 Module 4 grading rubric
Recruiting and selection plans in this course score well when sources, messages and methods are chosen from evidence and fitted to the role. This example uses Breaugh to choose sources and targeting, Chapman and colleagues to shape what applicants see and Schmidt and Hunter to choose selection methods by validity. The methods table makes the trade-offs clear, and the process combines methods that add to one another. Attention to the applicant's experience and fairness keeps the plan practical. Setting a modest test cutoff and checking for adverse impact shows awareness that validity and fairness must be weighed together.
COM 230 Module 4 help: mistakes that cost marks
Selection papers often rely on unstructured interviews and résumé screening, which predict performance poorly. Use methods with evidence of validity and combine them. Another weakness is treating recruitment as posting an ad; choose sources and messages that reach the right people. Consider what makes applicants want the job, including pay, fit and how they are treated. Check methods for fairness and adverse impact. Keep the process short enough that good candidates do not drop out. Finally, plan how you will check whether the hires perform well. Remember that the best candidates have other offers, so a slow or confusing process loses them first.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More COM 230 and Business Administration sample papers
- COM 230 Module 1: HRM and Value
- COM 230 Module 2: Legal Environment and Fair Treatment
- COM 230 Module 3: Job Analysis and Workforce Planning
- COM 230 Module 5: Training and Development
- COM 230 Module 6: Performance Management
- COM 230 Module 7: Compensation and Benefits
- COM 230 Module 8: Global and Strategic HR
- BUS 499 Module 1: Topic and Proposal
- BUS 454 Module 5: Corporate Social Responsibility
- MGT 240 Module 6: Inventory and Risk Pooling
- MGT 464 Module 6: Conflict and Conflict Management
COM 230 Module 4 questions, answered
What does COM 230 Module 4 usually ask for?
Aspen's COM 230 makes recruiting and selection the Module 4 topic, so a plan for attracting and choosing employees for a role is typical. Read your classroom prompt.
Which selection methods predict job performance best?
Schmidt and Hunter reported that general mental ability, work samples and structured interviews were among the most valid, and that combining methods improves prediction.
What attracts applicants to a job?
Chapman and colleagues found that job and organization characteristics, perceived fit and recruiter behavior predicted applicant attraction.
Where can I find a free COM 230 Module 4 sample paper?
The example above plans how a credit union recruits and selects universal bankers using evidence-based methods.
Which recruitment sources work best?
Breaugh's review found that employee referrals often produce hires who stay longer and perform well, partly because referred applicants have more accurate information.