Module 5 Discussion: Initial Post
Responsible for the Rate, Powerless at the Bedside: When a Nurse's Accountability Outruns Her Authority
The mismatch I want to examine involves the infection prevention nurse at a composite 280-bed hospital. Her performance goals include the intensive care unit's central line-associated bloodstream infection rate, which is reported publicly and tied to payment. Yet she has no authority over the two decisions that most affect it: how lines are inserted, which is controlled by physicians, and when lines are removed, which requires a physician order. When she observed a resident skip full barrier precautions, she could only report it afterward. When she identified three patients whose lines had not been used in two days, she could only suggest removal. She is accountable for an outcome produced by decisions others make. Kanter's theory of structural empowerment, tested with staff nurses, links access to information, support, resources, and opportunity to psychological empowerment, lower job strain, and greater work satisfaction (Spence Laschinger et al., 2001); a role that carries accountability without access to the levers of change is disempowering by design.
The mismatch is not only unfair; it undermines results. Evidence shows what happens when authority is aligned with responsibility. In a statewide program in more than 100 intensive care units, an intervention that included a checklist of evidence-based insertion practices, a cart with all needed supplies, daily discussion of whether each line was still needed, and explicit empowerment of nurses to stop an insertion if the checklist was not followed, was followed by a fall in the mean infection rate from 7.7 to 1.4 per 1,000 catheter-days at 16 to 18 months (Pronovost et al., 2006). The nurses in that program were given the authority to stop a procedure, which turned responsibility into something they could act on.
Interprofessional collaboration research supports structured practices of this kind, though the evidence base is still limited. A Cochrane review of nine studies found that practice-based interventions such as interprofessional rounds, meetings, checklists, and externally facilitated team activities may improve some aspects of professional practice and patient outcomes, while noting that the certainty of evidence is low (Reeves et al., 2017).
For our hospital, the fix is to share authority explicitly: a medical staff-approved policy giving any nurse the authority to pause a line insertion that departs from the checklist, a nurse-driven protocol allowing removal of lines that meet defined criteria without a new order, and daily interprofessional rounds that ask whether each line is still needed. The infection prevention nurse would then be accountable for a process she can influence.
Have others seen a role in which accountability was assigned without matching authority? How was it resolved?
References
Pronovost, P., Needham, D., Berenholtz, S., Sinopoli, D., Chu, H., Cosgrove, S., Sexton, B., Hyzy, R., Welsh, R., Roth, G., Bander, J., Kepros, J., & Goeschel, C. (2006). An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(26), 2725-2732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061115
Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6), Article CD000072. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3
Spence Laschinger, H. K., Finegan, J., Shamian, J., & Wilk, P. (2001). Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: Expanding Kanter's model. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(5), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200105000-00006
How this DNP 855 Module 5 example is structured
DNP855 Module 5 discussions often examine interprofessional collaboration where authority and responsibility do not match. Aspen does not publish module deliverables, so check your classroom for the exact prompt. This example describes one mismatch concretely, uses evidence to show the effect of aligning authority, weighs broader collaboration evidence honestly and proposes a specific fix with a question for peers.
DNP855 Module 5 questions, answered
What does DNP855 Module 5 usually ask for?
The module's discussion often asks you to examine interprofessional collaboration in a situation where someone's responsibility does not match their authority, and how to resolve it. Aspen does not publish module deliverables, so your classroom's instructions govern.
What did the Keystone ICU program show about nurse authority?
In more than 100 ICUs, an intervention that empowered nurses to stop line insertions that did not follow the checklist, along with daily review of line necessity, was followed by a fall in mean infection rates from 7.7 to 1.4 per 1,000 catheter-days.
Is there strong evidence for interprofessional collaboration interventions?
A Cochrane review found that practice-based interventions such as interprofessional rounds, meetings and checklists may improve practice and outcomes, but rated the certainty of the evidence as low.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.