| Course | DPH 830 Global Health |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Infectious disease control paper |
| Length | About 1,113 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Doctor of Public Health |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for DPH 830 Module 3
Nets, Needles and Trust: Lessons From Malaria and Ebola for Infectious Disease Control
Student Name
Doctor of Public Health Program, Aspen University
DPH 830: Global Health
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Nets, Needles and Trust: Lessons From Malaria and Ebola for Infectious Disease Control
Infectious diseases still cause a large share of death and illness in low-income countries, and new outbreaks can cross borders within days. Control depends on proven tools delivered at scale and on systems that detect and respond quickly. This paper examines infectious disease control worldwide through two contrasting experiences, the decline of malaria in Africa and the Ebola epidemic in West Africa, and draws lessons for program design.
Core Tools of Control
Infectious disease control combines surveillance to detect cases and outbreaks, prevention through vaccination, vector control, safe water and sanitation, and behavior change, and case management through diagnosis and treatment. Programs succeed when these tools are matched to how a pathogen spreads and delivered reliably to the people at risk.
Five Diseases Compared
The table compares five infections on the tools that matter most and the challenges that remain.
| Disease | Main control tools | Remaining challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Malaria | Insecticide-treated nets, indoor spraying, rapid tests, combination therapy | Insecticide and drug resistance; funding plateaus |
| Ebola | Case isolation, contact tracing, safe burial, vaccination | Early detection and community trust |
| Measles | Two-dose vaccination, outbreak response | Coverage gaps and vaccine hesitancy |
| Tuberculosis | Case finding, multi-drug treatment, preventive therapy | Undiagnosed cases; drug resistance |
| HIV | Testing, antiretroviral therapy, prevention including prophylaxis | Reaching key populations; lifelong care |
A Success: Malaria in Africa
Between 2000 and 2015, the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection in endemic Africa roughly halved and clinical cases fell by about 40%. A modeling study estimated that control interventions averted about 663 million clinical cases over the period, with insecticide-treated nets responsible for about 68% of cases averted, artemisinin-based combination therapy about 22% and indoor residual spraying about 10% (Bhatt et al., 2015).
Why Malaria Control Worked
Several factors converged: effective, low-cost tools; large increases in international funding; mass distribution campaigns that reached rural households; and national programs that tracked coverage. Nets worked because they protected people at night when mosquitoes bite, and because distribution was free and at scale rather than sold. Rapid diagnostic tests also allowed health workers to confirm malaria before treating, reducing waste of drugs and improving care for other fevers.
A Failure: Ebola in West Africa
The 2014 Ebola epidemic in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone spread for months before an effective response. By the ninth month, the case fatality rate among patients with recorded outcomes was about 71%, and projections warned of thousands more cases without stronger control (WHO Ebola Response Team, 2014). Weak health systems, delayed international action and community distrust allowed transmission to grow.
Why the Early Response Failed
An independent panel concluded that the response was slowed by weak national surveillance, delays in declaring an international emergency, inadequate funding and poor coordination among agencies. It recommended reforms including stronger core capacities in every country, an independent accountability mechanism and a dedicated outbreak response center (Moon et al., 2015).
Community Trust
Ebola control improved when communities became partners. Safe and dignified burial teams that respected customs, local leaders who explained the disease and survivors who spoke about recovery helped reduce resistance. The lesson applies to all infectious disease work: technical tools fail without trust.
The International Health Regulations
The International Health Regulations, revised in 2005, require countries to build core capacities to detect, assess and report public health events and to alert the World Health Organization to any event that could amount to a public health emergency of international concern. Many countries had not met these requirements by 2014, and Ebola exposed the gap between legal obligations and real capacity.
Vaccination
Vaccines are among the most cost-effective tools in global health. Measles vaccination has prevented millions of deaths, yet outbreaks recur where coverage falls below the high levels needed to interrupt transmission. An Ebola vaccine used in later outbreaks shows how new tools can change control strategies when paired with ring vaccination around cases. Sustaining high coverage requires reliable cold chains, trained vaccinators and trust.
Antimicrobial Resistance
Resistance threatens many gains. Mosquitoes resistant to insecticides, parasites with reduced sensitivity to artemisinin, drug-resistant tuberculosis and resistant bacteria all require surveillance, stewardship of drugs and investment in new tools. Resistance is a global problem that no country can solve alone.
Financing and Sustainability
Malaria gains depended on rapid increases in funding, and they are at risk when funding plateaus. Programs that rely heavily on external donors must plan for transition to domestic financing and integration into routine health services. Domestic budget lines for commodities, even modest ones, signal ownership and ease transitions when donor support declines.
Lessons for Program Design
Four lessons emerge: match tools to transmission; deliver them free and at scale; build surveillance and response into everyday health systems; and work with communities as partners. These lessons apply to future outbreaks as much as to endemic diseases.
Surveillance Systems
Early detection depends on surveillance that reaches the community level. Health workers who report unusual illness, laboratories that confirm pathogens quickly and data systems that alert district and national officials form the backbone of control. During the Ebola epidemic, weak surveillance meant that transmission went unrecognized for months in some areas, allowing chains of infection to multiply before any response began.
Community Health Workers
Community health workers extend control tools to households far from clinics. They distribute nets, test and treat malaria, trace contacts, support tuberculosis treatment and encourage vaccination. Programs that pay, train and supervise them well achieve far higher coverage than those relying on volunteers alone.
One Health
Many emerging infections, including Ebola, originate in animals. A One Health approach links human, animal and environmental health surveillance so that spillover events are detected early. Cooperation among health, agriculture and environment ministries remains weak in many countries and is a priority for preparedness.
Integrating Programs
Separate programs for each disease can duplicate supply chains, training and reporting. Integrating services at the point of care, such as combining malaria testing, childhood vaccination and nutrition screening in one visit, reduces burdens on families and health workers while maintaining disease-specific expertise at higher levels.
Measuring Control Progress
Programs track coverage of key tools, such as the share of households owning a net or children fully vaccinated, alongside outcomes like confirmed cases and deaths. Coverage indicators show whether delivery is working; outcome indicators show whether transmission is falling. Both must be reported by district so that districts with weak coverage stand out before outbreaks follow.
Conclusion
Malaria control in Africa shows what effective tools, funding and scale can achieve, while the Ebola epidemic shows the cost of weak surveillance, slow response and distrust. Infectious disease control worldwide depends on both proven interventions and strong, trusted systems that can detect and act on threats early.
References
Bhatt, S., Weiss, D. J., Cameron, E., Bisanzio, D., Mappin, B., Dalrymple, U., Battle, K. E., Moyes, C. L., Henry, A., Eckhoff, P. A., Wenger, E. A., Briƫt, O., Penny, M. A., Smith, T. A., Bennett, A., Yukich, J., Eisele, T. P., Griffin, J. T., Fergus, C. A., ... Gething, P. W. (2015). The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature, 526(7572), 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15535
Moon, S., Sridhar, D., Pate, M. A., Jha, A. K., Clinton, C., Delaunay, S., Edwin, V., Fallah, M., Fidler, D. P., Garrett, L., Goosby, E., Gostin, L. O., Heymann, D. L., Lee, K., Leung, G. M., Morrison, J. S., Saavedra, J., Tanner, M., Leigh, J. A., ... Piot, P. (2015). Will Ebola change the game? Ten essential reforms before the next pandemic. The report of the Harvard-LSHTM Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola. The Lancet, 386(10009), 2204-2221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00946-0
WHO Ebola Response Team. (2014). Ebola virus disease in West Africa: The first 9 months of the epidemic and forward projections. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(16), 1481-1495. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411100
Reading the DPH 830 Module 3 assignment instructions
Aspen's DPH 830 description includes infectious diseases, and since the third module's instructions are kept for students in the course, this sample analyzes control efforts worldwide. Infectious disease papers usually ask you to explain control strategies, analyze specific programs or outbreaks and draw lessons. Match tools to how each pathogen spreads. Use at least one success and one failure. Report figures with sources and years. Address community trust and health system capacity. Discuss resistance and financing. End with lessons that could guide a program you might lead. Explain how surveillance, community health workers and financing support each tool.
How the DPH 830 Module 3 example is put together
Core control tools are laid out first, followed by a three-column table comparing five infections. Malaria's decline in Africa and the reasons it worked come next, then Ebola in West Africa and why the early response failed. Headings on community trust, the International Health Regulations, vaccination, resistance and financing follow, along with lessons for program design. Later headings cover surveillance, community health workers, One Health, integrated services and how progress is measured. A margin remark notes that listing the tools first gives readers a frame for both cases. The malaria and Ebola sections mirror each other, first describing what happened and then explaining why, which makes the contrast easy to follow. The table gives one row to each of the five infections so readers can compare them at a glance.
Where the marks sit in the DPH 830 Module 3 rubric
Infectious disease papers earn marks for accurate description of control tools, careful use of evidence, analysis of why programs succeed or fail and practical lessons. This paper cites a Nature analysis of malaria control in Africa, the WHO Ebola Response Team's nine-month report and an independent panel's reforms after Ebola in APA style. The comparison table is concise. The contrast between malaria and Ebola is instructive. Community trust is treated as a technical requirement, not an afterthought, which instructors value. Figures are reported with their sources and time periods, and modeled estimates are identified as such. The paper also links infectious disease control to health system strengthening, a connection instructors look for.
DPH 830 Module 3 help: mistakes that cost marks
A frequent weakness is describing diseases without analyzing control. Another is citing old figures without dates. Pick cases that teach something. Explain which tools mattered and why. Include the role of communities and health systems. Mention resistance. When a disease's epidemiology is unfamiliar, our tutors can walk you through its transmission and the tools that interrupt it. Close with the lesson you would apply to the next outbreak. Build your paper around a clear question, such as why one program succeeded where another failed. Read the original studies behind the figures you use rather than secondary summaries. Explain each tool in terms of transmission: what it interrupts and for whom. Keep your lessons concrete enough that a program manager could act on them.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DPH 830 and Doctor of Public Health sample papers
- DPH 830 Module 1: Measuring Global Health and Its Burden
- DPH 830 Module 2: Comparing Health Systems Across Countries
- DPH 830 Module 4: Chronic Disease and Tobacco Control
- DPH 830 Module 5: Maternal, Infant and Women's Health
- DPH 830 Module 6: Climate, Environmental and Occupational Health
- DPH 830 Module 7: International Organizations and Governance
- DPH 830 Module 8: Human Rights and Ethics in Global Health
- DPH 810 Module 8: Doctoral Project Topic and Committee
- DPH 860 Module 5: Working From a Codebook
- DPH 850 Module 6: Evaluating an Information System
- DPH 870 Module 1: The Steps of Scientific Research
DPH 830 Module 3 questions, answered
What does DPH 830 Module 3 usually ask for?
Aspen's DPH 830 covers infectious diseases in a global context, so a paper on infectious disease control is typical. Follow your classroom prompt.
What drove the fall in African malaria?
Mainly insecticide-treated nets, with combination therapy and indoor spraying, delivered at scale with increased funding.
What are the International Health Regulations?
A binding framework requiring countries to detect, assess and report public health events and notify WHO of potential international emergencies.
Where can I find a free DPH 830 Module 3 sample paper?
The infectious disease control paper is shown above, with a table comparing malaria, Ebola, measles, tuberculosis and HIV.
What made malaria control succeed in DPH 830 Module 3?
Insecticide-treated nets, combination therapy and indoor spraying delivered free and at scale, supported by increased funding and tracking.