MPH 530 Module 3 Water Quality and Waterborne Disease Example

Reviewed by Douglas Renshaw, MBA Aspen University Updated September 2026

This MPH 530 Module 3 sample paper examines drinking water safety through the 1993 Milwaukee Cryptosporidium outbreak, the largest waterborne outbreak in US history. Environmental Issues in Public Health, one of the core courses in Aspen's MPH degree, looks at how water quality affects human health. Turbidity at one treatment plant rose for more than two weeks, oocysts passed the filters and an estimated 403,000 people fell ill. National estimates now put waterborne disease at about 7.15 million illnesses and 6,630 deaths a year, many from pathogens growing in pipes. A table lays out the multiple barriers from source protection to surveillance with Milwaukee's lessons. Regulatory changes, Legionella in building plumbing, private wells, nitrates, small systems, climate and a composite utility's plan round out the paper.

CourseMPH 530 Environmental Issues in Public Health
ModuleModule 3
Paper typeWater quality paper
LengthAbout 1,050 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramMaster of Public Health
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for MPH 530 Module 3

1

Safe From the Tap: Lessons From Milwaukee on Drinking Water and Waterborne Disease

Student Name

Master of Public Health Program, Aspen University

MPH 530: Environmental Issues in Public Health

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the goal of drinking water protection and the outbreak that tested it. APA 7 student title page.
2

Safe From the Tap: Lessons From Milwaukee on Drinking Water and Waterborne Disease

Safe drinking water is one of public health's greatest achievements, yet it is easy to take for granted. When treatment fails, the consequences can reach hundreds of thousands of people within days. This paper examines drinking water quality and waterborne disease through the 1993 Milwaukee Cryptosporidium outbreak, places it in the context of the current national burden and outlines improvements for a composite utility.

The National Burden

Waterborne disease remains common, and lead from pipes, as Flint showed, is only one of the threats water can carry (Hanna-Attisha et al., 2016). A national estimate for 17 waterborne infectious diseases found about 7.15 million illnesses each year, leading to 601,000 emergency department visits, 118,000 hospitalizations and 6,630 deaths, with direct health care costs of $3.33 billion. Most hospitalizations and deaths were caused by pathogens that grow in biofilms inside pipes, such as Legionella and nontuberculous mycobacteria (Collier et al., 2021).

What this page is doingOpening with the national burden shows the grader that waterborne disease is a present problem, not only a historical one.
3

The Milwaukee Outbreak

In the spring of 1993, the turbidity, or cloudiness, of treated water at one of Milwaukee's two treatment plants rose sharply from March 23 until the plant was shut down on April 9. Cryptosporidium oocysts were found in ice made in the affected area during those weeks, and laboratories recorded a more than 100-fold increase in cryptosporidium isolations. Illness typically lasted a median of nine days, with watery diarrhea in 93% of confirmed cases (Mac Kenzie et al., 1994). An estimated 403,000 people became ill, the largest waterborne outbreak in US history.

Why Treatment Failed

Cryptosporidium is a parasite whose oocysts resist chlorine, so removal depends on coagulation, settling and filtration. Heavy runoff from spring rains carried contamination into Lake Michigan near the plant's intake, and changes in the coagulant and plant operations reduced filtration effectiveness. Turbidity readings rose, but the water still met the standards of the time, and no one tested patients for the parasite routinely.

The Multiple Barrier Approach

Modern water safety relies on several barriers, so that if one fails others still protect the public. The table summarizes them.

BarrierPurposeMilwaukee lesson
Source water protectionKeep contamination out of rivers, lakes and aquifersRunoff near the intake raised the load of oocysts
TreatmentRemove and inactivate pathogens by filtration and disinfectionFiltration faltered; chlorine alone cannot kill Cryptosporidium
MonitoringDetect problems in real timeRising turbidity was not treated as an alarm
Distribution system integrityPrevent contamination and regrowth in pipesRelevant to biofilm pathogens
Surveillance and responseDetect illness in the communityParasite testing was not routine; diarrhea medicine sales rose first

Surveillance Signals

In Milwaukee, the first signals came from outside the water system: pharmacies reported surging sales of antidiarrheal medicines, and schools and nursing homes reported absences and illness. Today, syndromic surveillance of emergency visits and pharmacy sales, combined with rapid communication between utilities and health departments, aims to catch such signals within days.

Regulatory Changes

After Milwaukee, federal rules were strengthened to require tighter turbidity limits, better filtration performance and, for systems at higher risk, additional treatment such as ultraviolet light or ozone that inactivates Cryptosporidium. Utilities also increased monitoring of source water for the parasite.

Pathogens in Pipes

The shift in the national burden toward biofilm pathogens reflects aging pipes and plumbing in large buildings, where warm water and low disinfectant allow Legionella to grow. Legionnaires' disease outbreaks linked to hospitals, hotels and cooling towers have led to water management programs that monitor temperature and disinfectant levels in building plumbing.

Private Wells

About one in eight Americans relies on a private well that is not regulated under federal drinking water law. Well owners are responsible for testing, and many never test. Contamination with bacteria, nitrates from agriculture or naturally occurring arsenic is common in some regions. Health departments can offer free or low-cost testing and education, particularly after floods. Testing once a year for bacteria and every few years for nitrates and arsenic is a common recommendation, with extra tests after flooding or changes in taste or smell.

A Composite Utility Improvement Plan

A composite utility drawing from a river downstream of farms and a city plans several steps: continuous turbidity monitoring at each filter with automatic alerts; ultraviolet treatment as an additional barrier against Cryptosporidium; a source water protection partnership with farmers to reduce runoff; a written agreement to notify the health department within one hour of any treatment failure; and a joint surveillance plan tracking emergency visits for diarrheal illness.

Communicating With the Public

When treatment fails, utilities issue boil-water advisories or do-not-drink orders. Messages must reach everyone, including people with weakened immune systems, who face the greatest risk from Cryptosporidium. In Milwaukee, deaths occurred mainly among people with AIDS. Plans should include targeted outreach to clinics serving immunocompromised patients.

Nitrates and Agriculture

Chemical contaminants also matter. Nitrate from fertilizer and manure can enter groundwater, and high levels in drinking water can cause methemoglobinemia in infants. Agricultural regions with shallow wells face the greatest risk, and source water protection programs work with farmers to reduce runoff.

Equity in Water Safety

Small water systems, often in rural or low-income communities, have fewer resources for treatment upgrades and trained operators, and they account for many health-based violations. Tribal communities and colonias along the southern border may lack piped water altogether. Funding and technical assistance for small systems are equity measures.

Climate and Water

Heavy rainfall events, becoming more frequent with climate change, increase runoff and the risk that treatment plants will be overwhelmed, as happened in Milwaukee. Drought concentrates contaminants and can force utilities to switch sources. Water safety planning now includes climate projections.

Role of the Health Department

Health departments investigate suspected waterborne outbreaks, advise utilities on public notification, test private wells and track diarrheal illness. Formal agreements with utilities specify who notifies whom, how quickly and what data are shared, so that both agencies act within hours rather than days.

Conclusion

The Milwaukee outbreak showed how a failure in one barrier, combined with weak monitoring and surveillance, could sicken hundreds of thousands. Today's burden of waterborne disease, much of it from pathogens in pipes, shows that water safety demands constant attention. Multiple barriers, real-time monitoring, strong links between utilities and health departments and attention to private wells and building plumbing protect the public.

References

Collier, S. A., Deng, L., Adam, E. A., Benedict, K. M., Beshearse, E. M., Blackstock, A. J., Bruce, B. B., Derado, G., Edens, C., Fullerton, K. E., Gargano, J. W., Geissler, A. L., Hall, A. J., Havelaar, A. H., Hill, V. R., Hoekstra, R. M., Reddy, S. C., Scallan, E., Stokes, E. K., ... Beach, M. J. (2021). Estimate of burden and direct healthcare cost of infectious waterborne disease in the United States. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27(1), 140-149. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2701.190676

Hanna-Attisha, M., LaChance, J., Sadler, R. C., & Champney Schnepp, A. (2016). Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: A spatial analysis of risk and public health response. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003

Mac Kenzie, W. R., Hoxie, N. J., Proctor, M. E., Gradus, M. S., Blair, K. A., Peterson, D. E., Kazmierczak, J. J., Addiss, D. G., Fox, K. R., Rose, J. B., & Davis, J. P. (1994). A massive outbreak in Milwaukee of Cryptosporidium infection transmitted through the public water supply. New England Journal of Medicine, 331(3), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199407213310304

Reading the MPH 530 Module 3 assignment instructions

Water quality is named directly in Aspen's catalog description of MPH 530, and because Aspen shows the third module's instructions to enrolled students alone, this example focuses on drinking water and waterborne disease. These assignments generally ask you to explain how water becomes contaminated, how treatment and monitoring protect the public and what happens when they fail. Ask whether biological contaminants, chemical ones or both should be covered. Use a documented outbreak to make the analysis concrete. Explain the multiple-barrier approach. Include current national data so the paper is not only historical. Address groups at higher risk, such as people with weakened immune systems and private well users. Add how residents are told when something goes wrong.

Inside the MPH 530 Module 3 example

Roughly 1,000 words appear across fifteen headings, including a three-column table of water safety barriers. The paper opens with the national burden, describes the Milwaukee outbreak and why treatment failed, then presents the barriers. Surveillance signals, regulatory changes, pathogens in pipes, private wells, a composite utility plan and communication follow, along with nitrates, equity, climate and the health department's role. The margin comment next to the national burden explains why starting with current data frames waterborne disease as a present problem. The conclusion restates why every barrier matters. Each barrier in the table is tied to a specific Milwaukee lesson. Current national data frame the historical case.

Where the marks sit in the MPH 530 Module 3 rubric

Instructors marking water quality papers look for a sound account of contamination and treatment, correct use of outbreak and burden data, understanding of the multiple barrier approach and practical recommendations. Its evidence comes from the original Milwaukee outbreak report, a national waterborne burden estimate and the Flint lead study, all formatted in APA. The barrier table links each layer to the outbreak's lessons. Sections on pipe pathogens and private wells show awareness of current issues. Recommendations include specific monitoring and notification steps. Graders value papers that connect treatment engineering to public health surveillance. Clear distinctions between turbidity, disinfection and filtration show technical understanding. Mentioning notification agreements between utilities and health departments adds a practical, public health angle.

MPH 530 Module 3 help from the desk

A common weakness is describing a historical outbreak without connecting it to present risks. Another is treating chlorine as a complete solution without noting pathogens that resist it. Explain what each barrier does. Include private wells and building plumbing, which many papers ignore. Cite burden estimates with their year. If you need help finding outbreak reports for your area, a tutor can show you where state and federal outbreak data are published. End with the barrier you think is weakest in your community. Mention the groups at highest risk from your pathogen, such as people with weakened immune systems, and explain why. State which rule or standard applies to your example.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More MPH 530 and Master of Public Health sample papers

MPH 530 Module 3 questions, answered

What does MPH 530 Module 3 usually ask for?

Aspen's MPH 530 covers how water quality affects human health, so a paper on drinking water safety and waterborne disease is a typical assignment. Confirm with your classroom prompt.

What is the multiple barrier approach?

Protecting drinking water with several layers, source protection, treatment, monitoring, distribution integrity and surveillance, so one failure does not reach the public.

Why is Cryptosporidium hard to control?

Its oocysts resist chlorine, so removal depends on effective filtration or treatments such as ultraviolet light.

Where can I find a free MPH 530 Module 3 sample paper?

The Milwaukee drinking water paper appears above, with its table of water safety barriers and lessons from the outbreak.

What is the multiple barrier approach in MPH 530 Module 3?

Layers of protection, source water protection, treatment, monitoring, distribution integrity and surveillance, so a failure in one does not reach the public.