| Course | ADC 655 Neurobiology of Addiction |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | Relapse research paper |
| Length | About 1,065 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Psychology and Addiction Studies |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for ADC 655 Module 7
Three Doors Back to Use: What Relapse Research Shows About Drugs, Cues and Stress
Student Name
Psychology and Addiction Studies Program, Aspen University
ADC 655: Neurobiology of Addiction
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Doors Back to Use: What Relapse Research Shows About Drugs, Cues and Stress
After nine weeks at the Colorado Springs residential program these papers follow, Jay, whose words about using to feel normal opened an earlier module, was preparing to go home. He was stable on buprenorphine and determined, but worried: "What's going to set me off?" Jay, Nadia and the program are fictional. This paper reviews what relapse research has found and how it shaped his plan.
Three Triggers in the Laboratory
Shaham et al. (2003) reviewed the reinstatement model of relapse. Animals trained to self-administer a drug undergo extinction, in which drug seeking goes unrewarded until it fades. Researchers then test what revives seeking. Three kinds of trigger have proved reliable across drugs and laboratories. Drug priming, a small dose of the drug itself, reinstates seeking. Cues previously paired with the drug, such as a light or tone, reinstate it. And stressors, such as brief footshock, reinstate it. The authors noted that these triggers correspond to the precipitants of relapse that people describe: a single use, reminders of use and stress. The model has been used to identify brain circuits for each trigger and to screen potential medications.
A Common Pathway
Kalivas and Volkow (2005) reviewed research on the brain basis of drug seeking. They described addiction as a pathology of motivation and choice, in which the value of drugs rises and the value of other rewards falls. Central to their account is a pathway from the prefrontal cortex to the nucleus accumbens that uses glutamate, the brain's main excitatory messenger. Animal studies suggested that activity in this pathway is required for reinstatement by drug, cues and stress alike, making it a possible final common pathway for drug seeking. Repeated drug use alters glutamate signaling in this pathway in ways that may make drug seeking harder to stop once triggered. They suggested that medications targeting glutamate might reduce relapse.
Evidence in People
Sinha et al. (2006) studied people with cocaine dependence in inpatient treatment. Before discharge, participants listened to personalized scripts describing a stressful situation from their own lives, a drug-related situation and a neutral situation, while their craving and stress hormones were measured. After discharge, participants whose stress scripts produced stronger craving and stronger stress hormone responses relapsed sooner and used more cocaine. The study gave human evidence that stress reactivity, measured in the laboratory, predicts relapse, consistent with the animal findings.
Matching Triggers to Strategies
| Trigger | Laboratory evidence | Human parallel | Strategy for Jay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Drug priming | A small dose revives seeking | A single use leads to more | Stay on buprenorphine, which blunts the effect of opioids; plan for a lapse |
| Cues | Light or tone paired with drug revives seeking | Places, people, objects linked to use | Avoid old supplier's area; remove pill bottles; plan for unavoidable cues |
| Stress | Footshock revives seeking | Stress-induced craving predicts relapse | Stress plan for knee pain flares and money worries |
| All three | Common glutamate pathway | Triggers often combine | Layered plan; early help when two triggers coincide |
Pain as a Stressor
For Jay, chronic knee pain was both a stressor and a reminder of how his opioid use began. Pain activates stress systems and can produce craving directly, especially in people whose opioid use started with prescriptions. His plan therefore treated pain management as relapse prevention: regular physical therapy, a non-opioid pain plan from his physician and an agreement to tell his prescriber about any flare rather than managing it alone.
Jay's Plan
Jay's plan addressed each trigger. For drug priming, he would continue buprenorphine, which occupies opioid receptors and reduces the effect of other opioids, and he agreed on what to do if he used: call his outpatient counselor the same day rather than conclude he had failed. For cues, he would not visit the friend who had supplied pills, would ask his sister to remove old prescription bottles from his house and would rehearse a response to the pharmacy where he used to fill prescriptions. For stress, which for Jay centered on flares of knee pain and debt, he would use a pain management plan from his physician, keep his physical therapy appointments and meet with a financial counselor. Nadia noted that the most dangerous moments would be when two triggers came together, such as a pain flare during a stressful week.
When Triggers Combine
The laboratory isolates triggers; life combines them. A person may face a stressful argument in a place full of cues, or take a single drink at a party where old friends are using. The convergence of triggers on a common pathway suggests that combinations may be especially dangerous. Relapse prevention plans should therefore identify the situations where triggers are likely to coincide and arrange extra support for them in advance.
Medications and the Glutamate Pathway
Kalivas and Volkow's account of glutamate signaling has encouraged research on medications that act on this system. Some candidates showed promise in animals and early human studies, though none has yet become a standard treatment. The search illustrates how relapse research moves from laboratory findings toward clinical tools, and how slow and uncertain that path can be.
Limits
Animal reinstatement differs from human relapse in important ways. Animals do not choose abstinence, and extinction is not the same as a person's decision to stop. Human studies of predictors, like Sinha and colleagues', are valuable but measure risk in groups rather than certainty for individuals.
Rehearsing the First Week Home
Nadia asked Jay to walk through his first week at home day by day. Monday brought the drive past the pharmacy where he used to fill early prescriptions, a cue. Wednesday brought a physical therapy appointment that always left his knee aching, a stressor tied to pain. Friday brought a card game with a cousin who still used, where a priming offer was likely. For each day they wrote one step: a different route, a call to his sponsor after therapy and a decision to skip the card game for a month, matching the three triggers that Shaham et al. (2003) described.
Conclusion
Shaham and colleagues' review shows that drug priming, cues and stress revive drug seeking in animals, Kalivas and Volkow describe a glutamate pathway through which these triggers may act and Sinha and colleagues show that stress reactivity predicts relapse in people. Jay's plan addresses all three triggers, with particular attention to moments when they coincide.
References
Kalivas, P. W., & Volkow, N. D. (2005). The neural basis of addiction: A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(8), 1403-1413. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.8.1403
Shaham, Y., Shalev, U., Lu, L., de Wit, H., & Stewart, J. (2003). The reinstatement model of drug relapse: History, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology, 168(1-2), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-002-1224-x
Sinha, R., Garcia, M., Paliwal, P., Kreek, M. J., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2006). Stress-induced cocaine craving and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses are predictive of cocaine relapse outcomes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(3), 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.3.324
ADC 655 Module 7 instructions, in plain terms
The seventh module of ADC 655 typically asks for a paper on relapse research. Use the Module 7 instructions in your Aspen course; the client here is fictional. Describe the main triggers of relapse identified in animal research, with how each was tested. Explain the brain pathways thought to be involved. Report human evidence on predictors of relapse, including how they were measured. Match triggers to prevention strategies in a table, so each finding leads to an action. Apply the findings to a client's relapse prevention plan. Supply APA 7 references, and distinguish what animal models suggest from what human studies have shown. Tailor the plan to the client's own triggers, including stressors such as pain or money that are specific to them.
Inside the ADC 655 Module 7 example
Jay, the composite client who once used oxycodone to feel normal, prepares for discharge on buprenorphine. Shaham and colleagues' Psychopharmacology review describes reinstatement by drug priming, cues and stress. Kalivas and Volkow's American Journal of Psychiatry review describes the glutamate pathway from prefrontal cortex to nucleus accumbens. Sinha and colleagues' Archives of General Psychiatry study shows stress-induced craving and stress hormone responses predicting relapse in people in treatment. A four-row table matches triggers to strategies. Jay's plan addresses each: staying on buprenorphine, managing cues at home and building stress responses he can use when his chronic knee pain flares. It also says what he will do after a lapse.
ADC 655 Module 7 rubric: what earns full marks
Relapse research papers earn credit for integrating animal and human evidence and translating it into specific prevention strategies. This example describes each trigger with its laboratory evidence and its human counterpart. The brain pathway is explained with its proposed role as a common route and its limits as a treatment target so far. Human evidence comes from a study measuring stress responses before discharge, which strengthens the link to clinical practice. The table makes the translation explicit. The client plan addresses all three triggers, including a stressor, chronic pain, specific to him. The warning about moments when triggers coincide reflects the convergence the brain research describes.
ADC 655 Module 7 help from the desk
Relapse research papers often list triggers without explaining the evidence behind them. Describe how each was studied, since the procedure shapes what a finding means. Connect animal and human findings explicitly, noting where human evidence confirms the animal work. Explain brain pathways in plain terms. Translate each trigger into a strategy the client can actually use. Tailor the plan to the client's specific risks. Remember that relapse prevention also involves what to do after a lapse; a plan that only aims at prevention leaves clients without guidance when a slip occurs. Share the plan with people the client trusts, since they may notice rising risk first.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More ADC 655 and Psychology and Addiction Studies sample papers
- ADC 655 Module 1: The Brain's Reward System
- ADC 655 Module 2: How Drugs Act on the Brain
- ADC 655 Module 3: The Stages of the Addiction Cycle
- ADC 655 Module 4: Animal Models of Addiction
- ADC 655 Module 5: Neuroimaging in Addiction
- ADC 655 Module 6: Stress, Withdrawal and Craving
- ADC 655 Module 8: Genetics and Implications for Treatment
- PAC 201 Module 4: Perception and Cognition in the First Years
- PAC 610 Module 1: Neurons, Neurotransmitters and History
- PAC 110 Module 7: Systems of Psychotherapy in Addiction Practice
- SBS 105 Module 1: Psychology as a Science
ADC 655 Module 7 questions, answered
What does ADC 655 Module 7 usually ask for?
Aspen's ADC 655 covers relapse research in this module, so a paper on relapse triggers, brain pathways and prevention is typical. Open your Module 7 prompt.
What triggers relapse?
Animal research reviewed by Shaham and colleagues identifies three triggers that revive drug seeking: a small dose of the drug, drug-related cues and stress.
Does stress predict relapse in people?
Sinha and colleagues found that cocaine users with stronger stress-induced craving and stress hormone responses during treatment relapsed sooner afterward.
Where can I find a free ADC 655 Module 7 sample paper?
This page has the full paper: relapse triggers, the brain pathway for drug seeking, human evidence and a table matching triggers to strategies.
What brain pathway drives drug seeking?
Kalivas and Volkow describe a glutamate pathway from the prefrontal cortex to the nucleus accumbens as a common route for drug seeking triggered by drugs, cues or stress.