BUS 495 Module 1 Globalization and Distance Example

Reviewed by Douglas Renshaw, MBA Aspen University Updated October 2026

This BUS 495 Module 1 sample paper tests a familiar claim, that markets have become global and borders matter less every year, against what firms actually do. Aspen University's International Business course begins with why business across borders differs from business at home, and the paper answers with research and federal data. Levitt's 1983 argument for standardized global products is set against Ghemawat's four kinds of distance and Rugman and Verbeke's finding that only nine of the world's largest firms sold widely across all three major regions. Census Bureau figures on 277,799 U.S. exporters in 2023 show how concentrated exporting is. A composite Wisconsin maker of sanitary valves for dairy plants, with 38% of sales abroad, shows the pattern inside one company: most foreign revenue comes from Canada and Mexico.

CourseBUS 495 International Business
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeGlobalization analysis
LengthAbout 1,154 words, 7 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramBusiness Administration
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for BUS 495 Module 1

1

Sold in Forty Countries, Mostly Next Door: Why International Business Is Not Domestic Business on a Larger Scale

Student Name

Business Administration Program, Aspen University

BUS 495: International Business

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title contrasts global reach with regional reality, which is the paper's argument. APA 7 student title page.
2

Sold in Forty Countries, Mostly Next Door: Why International Business Is Not Domestic Business on a Larger Scale

Driftless Valve Works, a composite manufacturer in western Wisconsin, makes stainless steel valves used in dairy, beverage and food processing plants. Its website lists customers in forty countries, and visitors could easily conclude that the company sells everywhere. Its sales records tell a different story. Of the 38% of revenue earned outside the United States, more than two thirds comes from Canada and Mexico. Customers in Europe, Asia and Oceania exist, but each took years to win and buys in small amounts. The company's experience raises the question at the center of this course: if markets are global, why does selling across borders remain so different from selling at home?

The Case for Global Markets

Levitt (1983) argued that communication and transportation technology were driving the world toward a converging commonality. In his view, consumers everywhere increasingly wanted the same reliable, modern products at low prices, and companies that standardized their offerings and sold them worldwide would defeat those that tailored products to each country. Levitt's essay shaped a generation of managers and contains real insight. Industrial buyers such as dairy processors do share technical standards, and a valve that meets sanitary requirements in Wisconsin is close to what a plant in Ontario needs. Some products are indeed converging.

Distance Still Matters

Ghemawat (2001) replied that managers routinely overestimate the attractiveness of foreign markets because they look at size and income while ignoring the costs of distance. He described four kinds of distance, known by the initials CAGE. Cultural distance includes differences in language, religion and social norms. Administrative or political distance includes differences in laws, currencies, political ties and trade agreements. Geographic distance includes physical remoteness, time zones and transport links. Economic distance includes differences in income and in the cost and quality of resources. Countries that are closer on these dimensions trade much more with each other, and the costs of distance vary by industry.

What this page is doingGiving each form of distance its own sentence shows the framework is understood, not just named.
3

Regional, Not Global

Rugman and Verbeke (2004) tested whether the world's largest firms were truly global. Examining the geographic distribution of sales of the largest multinationals for which data were available, they found that the great majority earned most of their sales in their home region of North America, Europe or Asia. Only nine met their definition of global, with at least 20% of sales in each of the three regions and less than half in any one. Their conclusion was that most large firms pursue regional strategies, whatever their annual reports say about global reach.

How U.S. Companies Export

Federal data show the same concentration among American exporters. The table summarizes the Census Bureau's profile of companies that exported goods in 2023 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025).

Most exporters are small, and most sell to a single foreign market. A small number of large firms reaching many countries account for most of the value. The report also found that 92,263 companies that exported in 2023 had not reported exports in 2022, a sign that many firms move in and out of foreign markets (U.S. Census Bureau, 2025).

Measure2023 value
Identified U.S. exporting companies277,799
Small and medium-sized exporters, fewer than 500 employees270,014, about 97% of exporters
Known export value of identified exporters$1,781 billion
Share of known export value from large exportersNearly 67%
Exporters shipping to only one country60.1% of exporters, 5.7% of known export value
Exporters shipping to 25 or more countries1.9% of exporters, 68.4% of known export value
What this page is doingPairing counts of firms with shares of value prevents the table from being misread.
4

Distance at Driftless Valve Works

The CAGE framework explains the company's sales map. Canada and Mexico are close in every sense that matters to a valve maker. Trucks reach Ontario dairies in a day, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement keeps most tariffs at zero, technical standards for sanitary equipment are similar, and the company's sales engineers can visit customers and return within a week. The Netherlands is a strong dairy market but more distant administratively, because European buyers require certifications under different standards, and culturally, because procurement relies on long-standing relationships with European suppliers. New Zealand, home to large dairy cooperatives, is geographically remote; winning its first order took three years, a local service partner and a willingness to hold spare parts in Auckland.

The company's export pattern resembles the national one. Like most American exporters, it began with one foreign market, Canada, and added others slowly. Like Rugman and Verbeke's multinationals, it is regional in practice even though it is global in reach.

Choosing the Next Market

The company's managers now use distance deliberately when choosing where to grow. Before a sales trip, the export manager scores each candidate country on the four CAGE dimensions using simple evidence: whether the country's sanitary standards match those Driftless already meets, whether a trade agreement removes tariffs on valves, how many days a replacement part takes to arrive and whether local processors pay prices close to American ones. Chile scored well on administrative distance because of its trade agreement with the United States, but poorly on geography. Ireland scored well on culture and standards but sits inside the European Union's certification rules. The scoring does not make the decision, yet it forces the managers to price distance before they commit staff and inventory to a market that looks attractive only on a population chart.

What Levitt Still Explains

The evidence against a flat world does not erase Levitt's insight. Within the company's industry, sanitary design rules, stainless steel grades and automated cleaning systems are increasingly shared across countries, and a dairy engineer in Mexico reads the same technical journals as one in Wisconsin. Product convergence of this kind lowers one kind of distance even as administrative and geographic costs remain. The practical lesson is that globalization proceeds unevenly, faster for technical standards than for law, logistics or trust, and a firm must judge each of those separately.

What Makes International Business Different

Three lessons follow. First, foreign markets differ in ways that size and income figures hide, so each market requires its own assessment. Second, distance has costs that fall unevenly: geography raises the cost of service, while administrative distance raises the cost of compliance and cultural distance raises the cost of building trust. Third, the firm's own position matters; a company that has learned to serve Canada has not thereby learned to serve New Zealand.

Conclusion

Levitt was right that technology connects markets and that some products converge, but the evidence shows that distance still shapes where firms sell and how much it costs them to do so. Most of the largest multinationals are regional, most American exporters sell to one country, and a Wisconsin valve maker with customers in forty countries earns most of its foreign revenue across its own borders. International business is different because every border adds a layer of cultural, administrative, geographic and economic distance that domestic business never has to cross.

References

Ghemawat, P. (2001). Distance still matters: The hard reality of global expansion. Harvard Business Review, 79(8), 137-147.

Levitt, T. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 92-102.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2004). A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400073

U.S. Census Bureau. (2025). A profile of U.S. importing and exporting companies, 2022-2023 (Release No. CB25-52). https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/edb/edbrel2023.pdf

BUS 495 Module 1 instructions, in plain terms

Aspen describes BUS 495 as covering the unique challenges of doing business globally and why international business is different from domestic business, so an opening module paper usually asks students to explain globalization and its limits. The Module 1 instructions in your classroom set the length and focus; this example treats them as an evidence-based essay. Define globalization in terms you can test. Present the strongest argument that markets are converging, then the evidence that differences between countries still shape business. Use current data, such as trade statistics, rather than general impressions. Show that you understand distance in more than miles by naming its cultural, political and economic forms. Apply the ideas to a real or composite company. Conclude with a clear answer to the question of why international business is different, which later modules build on.

How the BUS 495 Module 1 example is put together

The paper starts with a sales map of a composite valve company in Wisconsin that sells in forty countries. Levitt's Harvard Business Review argument that technology was pushing the world toward common, low-priced products comes first. Ghemawat's CAGE framework follows, explaining four kinds of distance that reduce trade. Rugman and Verbeke's study of the largest multinationals shows most sell mainly in their home region. A table drawn from the Census profile of importing and exporting companies reports that 60.1% of exporters shipped to one country and that 1.9% shipped to 25 or more countries but carried 68.4% of known export value. The company section shows that Canada and Mexico produce most foreign sales, while a dairy cooperative in New Zealand took three years to win, and the conclusion explains why.

BUS 495 Module 1 rubric: what earns full marks

Expect an opening analytical paper to be judged on five things: whether it has a clear thesis, whether its concepts are used correctly, whether its evidence is credible, whether it applies the ideas and whether it is well organized. This example states its thesis early, that distance still shapes business even in a connected economy, and returns to it in every section. Concepts are attributed correctly: global markets to Levitt, the CAGE framework to Ghemawat and regional strategy to Rugman and Verbeke. Federal statistics are reported with their year and unit, and the table separates the count of exporters from the value of exports, which students often confuse. The company example connects each concept to a decision the firm actually faced. References include two Harvard Business Review articles, a Journal of International Business Studies article and the Census report, all cited where they are used and listed alphabetically.

BUS 495 Module 1 help from the desk

A common weakness in Module 1 is a paper that celebrates globalization in general terms without evidence. Instructors look for analysis: what has become global, what has not, and why. Another is treating distance as geography alone, when differences in language, law, currency and income often matter more. Avoid outdated statistics; trade data are published every year, so use the most recent release and name it. Be careful with units, since a share of companies and a share of export value can tell very different stories. If you use a company example, connect it to the concepts rather than describing its history. Keep claims proportionate: the evidence shows that borders still matter, not that globalization has failed. A paragraph acknowledging what the other side gets right strengthens rather than weakens your argument.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More BUS 495 and Business Administration sample papers

BUS 495 Module 1 questions, answered

What does BUS 495 Module 1 usually ask for?

Aspen's BUS 495 opens with globalization and why international business differs from domestic business, so an analytical paper on that question, supported by evidence, is typical. Check your classroom prompt for specifics.

What is the CAGE framework?

Ghemawat's way of describing distance between countries in four forms: cultural, administrative or political, geographic and economic, each of which can reduce trade and investment.

Are most large companies truly global?

Rugman and Verbeke found that very few are. Most of the largest multinationals they studied earned the majority of their sales in their home region.

Where can I find a free BUS 495 Module 1 sample paper?

Read the full paper above: Levitt, Ghemawat and Rugman and Verbeke applied to a composite Wisconsin valve maker, with a table of Census data on U.S. exporters.

How many U.S. companies export?

The Census Bureau identified 277,799 exporting companies in 2023, and about 97% of them were small or medium-sized enterprises.