| Course | BUS 495 International Business |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Cultural comparison paper |
| Length | About 1,116 words, 7 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUS 495 Module 2
Scores Are Where the Conversation Starts: Preparing an Ohio Parts Distributor for a Sales Office in Wroclaw, Poland
Student Name
Business Administration Program, Aspen University
BUS 495: International Business
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Scores Are Where the Conversation Starts: Preparing an Ohio Parts Distributor for a Sales Office in Wroclaw, Poland
Buckeye Comfort Supply, a composite Columbus, Ohio, wholesaler of furnace, heat pump and air-conditioning parts, has shipped replacement compressors, controls and heat exchangers to installers in Poland for two years. Demand has grown as Polish homeowners replace coal-fired heating with heat pumps, and the company now plans to open a small sales and service office in Wroclaw. Its managers have successfully sold across the United States, but they know little about Polish business culture. This paper compares the two cultures, explains the limits of such comparisons and recommends how the company should hire, sell and manage in Poland.
Comparing the Two Cultures
Hofstede et al. (2010) describe national cultures on six dimensions derived from large surveys of employees and later replications. Power distance is the extent to which less powerful members accept unequal distribution of power. Individualism is the degree to which people are expected to look after themselves rather than belong to tight groups. Masculinity reflects the emphasis on achievement and competition rather than caring and quality of life. Uncertainty avoidance measures discomfort with ambiguity and unknown situations. Long-term orientation reflects a focus on future rewards and adaptation, and indulgence reflects the freedom to enjoy life and gratify desires. The table shows the published scores for the two countries.
| Dimension | United States | Poland | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power distance | 40 | 68 | 28 |
| Individualism | 91 | 60 | 31 |
| Masculinity | 62 | 64 | 2 |
| Uncertainty avoidance | 46 | 93 | 47 |
| Long-term orientation | 26 | 38 | 12 |
| Indulgence | 68 | 29 | 39 |
What the Largest Gaps Might Mean
The widest gap is in uncertainty avoidance. A score of 93 suggests that, on average, Polish business culture values rules, detailed information and clear procedures more than American business culture does. For a parts distributor, this may mean that installers expect complete technical documentation, firm delivery dates and written terms, and that a casual promise to sort out details later would raise concern rather than reassure. The gap in indulgence suggests a more restrained and serious public style, which could make American sales enthusiasm seem out of place. The power distance gap suggests that decisions in some Polish firms may rest with the owner or director, so sales efforts aimed only at technicians might stall. The individualism gap, though large, still places both countries on the individualist side.
The Limits of National Scores
These interpretations must be held loosely. Kirkman et al. (2006), reviewing a quarter century of research using Hofstede's framework, found that the dimensions had been widely used and often useful, but that many studies applied them carelessly, for example by assuming that national scores describe individuals. Taras et al. (2016) went further, showing that most of the variation in cultural values lies within countries rather than between them, and that factors such as occupation, generation and socioeconomic status can predict values as well as or better than nationality. A young installer in Wroclaw who trained in Germany may resemble an Ohio installer more than a retired Polish executive. National scores are a reasonable place to begin preparing, but they are not a description of the customer.
Communication and Feedback
Meyer (2014) offers scales that translate cultural differences into everyday business behavior. Her communication scale runs from low-context cultures, where good communication is explicit and simple, to high-context cultures, where meaning is layered and implied. Her evaluating scale separates how directly people deliver negative feedback. On both scales, the United States sits at the explicit end of communication but uses relatively softened criticism, wrapping negative comments in positive ones. Meyer's practical advice is to ask how criticism is usually delivered in the other culture and to adjust, rather than assuming one's own habits are neutral.
What the Team Observed
Buckeye's export manager, who has visited Poland four times, reported observations that partly match the scores. Installers asked detailed technical questions and requested specifications in writing before placing first orders. Several asked for formal quotations even for small purchases. Directors of larger contracting firms expected to meet the company's senior managers before committing. Some observations did not match expectations: younger installers were quick to use the company's online ordering system and preferred informal messaging once a relationship existed. The export manager also noticed that Polish customers gave direct criticism about a late shipment, which she found blunt at first and later valued.
Selling to Polish Installers
The cultural comparison has direct implications for how the office sells. Installers who replace coal boilers with heat pumps take on financial and technical risk with every job, because a failed compressor in January can cost them a customer and a reputation. A supplier that reduces that uncertainty, through stocked parts, reliable delivery windows and clear warranty procedures, offers something these customers value. Sales materials should therefore emphasize documented performance, certifications and service guarantees rather than slogans. Training sessions for installers, held at the Wroclaw office with a Polish-speaking technician, would serve both as marketing and as a way to build the relationships that larger contractors expect before they change suppliers.
Managing the Wroclaw Office
Management practices also need adjustment. An American manager might invite staff to challenge decisions openly in meetings and expect them to take initiative without detailed instructions. Where power distance is higher, some employees may wait for clear direction and be reluctant to contradict a manager in front of others, at least until trust develops. The office manager should set clear roles and procedures from the start, explain the reasons behind decisions and create private channels for staff to raise concerns. None of this should be imposed rigidly; the first hires will show which practices fit this particular team.
Recommendations
First, the company should hire a Polish office manager with industry experience rather than relocate an American manager, because relationships and language matter more than product knowledge in the first years. Second, every proposal should include full technical specifications, delivery terms and warranty conditions in Polish, reflecting the strong preference for clear information. Third, contracts should be detailed, and promises should be made only when they can be kept. Fourth, senior managers from Columbus should visit major customers in person during the first year. Fifth, American managers should be coached on feedback, learning to receive direct criticism as useful and to give clear criticism without excessive softening.
Conclusion
The comparison suggests that Buckeye's Wroclaw office will succeed by offering clarity, documentation and personal relationships with decision-makers, and by hiring local talent. The published scores point to these needs, but research and the team's own experience show that individuals vary widely within any country. The company should use the scores as a starting point for questions, not as a script.
References
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture's Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285-320. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
Meyer, E. (2014). The culture map: Breaking through the invisible boundaries of global business. PublicAffairs.
Taras, V., Steel, P., & Kirkman, B. L. (2016). Does country equate with culture? Beyond geography in the search for cultural boundaries. Management International Review, 56(4), 455-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0283-x
BUS 495 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
Aspen's catalog names cultural differences among the core challenges of global business in BUS 495, and a second module paper commonly asks students to compare two cultures and apply the comparison to business. Check the classroom prompt for Module 2 specifics; this example reads it as a comparison for one company's entry decision. Choose a recognized framework and report the actual scores or ratings with their source. Explain what each difference might mean for business practice, such as negotiating, managing or marketing. Discuss the limits of national averages, since individuals vary and organizations have their own cultures. Use evidence from people with experience in the country where possible. Avoid stereotypes and loaded language. End with specific recommendations that the company could act on, linked back to the differences you identified.
How this BUS 495 Module 2 example is built
The opening introduces the distributor's decision to serve Polish installers from a Wroclaw office after two years of shipping from Ohio. A table sets the published Hofstede scores for the United States beside those for Poland on all six of his dimensions. Sections interpret the three largest gaps for sales and management. Taras, Steel and Kirkman's finding about variation within countries and Kirkman and colleagues' review of studies using Hofstede's dimensions temper the interpretation. Meyer's scales on low- and high-context communication and on direct and indirect criticism add practical guidance. Observations from the team's first months, such as detailed technical questions and requests for written terms, are compared with the scores. Recommendations follow on hiring, written proposals, contracts and feedback.
BUS 495 Module 2 rubric: what earns full marks
A culture comparison wins its points by handling a framework accurately, interpreting it sensibly, admitting its limits, bringing evidence and turning all of that into practical advice. This example reports actual published scores with their source rather than adjectives, and it explains what each gap might mean in a sales office instead of stopping at the numbers. Its sources include the third edition of Cultures and Organizations by Hofstede, Hofstede and Minkov, a Journal of International Business Studies review by Kirkman, Lowe and Gibson, Taras, Steel and Kirkman's Management International Review article and Meyer's The Culture Map. The paper earns credit for critical thinking by showing where observations matched the scores and where they did not. Recommendations are concrete and tied to identified differences, which links the analysis to the business decision.
BUS 495 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks
The most frequent problem in culture papers is stereotyping: turning a national average into a statement about every person in the country. Use careful language such as on average or tends to, and remember that the person across the table may differ sharply from the average. Another problem is describing dimensions without explaining their business implications. Report scores with their source and edition, since published values have been revised over time. Include the limits of the framework; instructors reward students who know that national scores describe populations, not individuals. If you can, add evidence from people who have worked in the country. Keep the tone respectful. Finally, compare your own culture as well; the paper is about the gap between two cultures, and the home country's habits are half of that gap.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More BUS 495 and Business Administration sample papers
- BUS 495 Module 1: Globalization and Distance
- BUS 495 Module 3: Country Risk Analysis
- BUS 495 Module 4: Trade and Investment
- BUS 495 Module 5: Exchange Rate Exposure
- BUS 495 Module 6: Global Strategy
- BUS 495 Module 7: Market Entry Mode
- BUS 495 Module 8: Managing Across Borders
- BUS 210 Module 3: Management and Structure Paper
- BUS 305 Module 2: Routine and Positive Messages
- BUS 454 Module 1: Ethics and the Stakeholder View
- BUS 484 Module 2: Opportunity Assessment
BUS 495 Module 2 questions, answered
What does BUS 495 Module 2 usually ask for?
Aspen's BUS 495 covers national differences in culture in this module, so a paper comparing two cultures with a framework such as Hofstede's and applying the comparison to business is typical. Follow your classroom prompt.
What are Hofstede's six dimensions?
Power distance, individualism, masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation and indulgence, each scored for many countries from survey data.
Do national culture scores apply to individuals?
No. They describe averages for a country's population, and research shows that most variation in values lies within countries, so individuals can differ widely from their country's score.
Where can I find a free BUS 495 Module 2 sample paper?
The full paper is posted above: an Ohio distributor preparing a sales office in Wroclaw, with a table of Hofstede scores for the United States and Poland, research on the limits of national scores and recommendations.
How should I avoid stereotypes in a culture paper?
Use published data with sources, describe tendencies rather than certainties, acknowledge variation among individuals and include first-hand observations where possible.