| Course | BUS 532 Healthcare Marketing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | Ethics and regulation review |
| Length | About 1,060 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | MBA |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for BUS 532 Module 7
Less Pain, Faster Recovery, Free Gift Card: An Ethics and Regulation Review of a Hospital's Robotic Surgery Campaign
Student Name
MBA Program, Aspen University
BUS 532: Healthcare Marketing
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Less Pain, Faster Recovery, Free Gift Card: An Ethics and Regulation Review of a Hospital's Robotic Surgery Campaign
Peachtree Valley Medical Center, a composite Georgia community hospital with 280 beds, recently purchased a surgical robot for about $2 million and trained four surgeons to use it for gallbladder, hernia and gynecologic procedures. To build volume, the marketing team drafted a campaign for billboards, social media and television, and planned a free community screening event for hernias and gynecologic concerns. The vice president of marketing asked for an ethics and regulation review before launch. This paper provides that review. It is a learning example, not legal advice, and the hospital's counsel will review the final materials.
The Draft Campaign
The draft materials contain six elements. The headline promises less pain, faster recovery and smaller scars. A second line says the hospital is the region's number one choice for robotic surgery. A testimonial features a patient who returned to work in three days. A social media post states that robotic surgery is safer than traditional surgery. The screening event offers a $25 gift card to every attendee. And the campaign will run in Spanish as well as English.
Why Health Care Advertising Needs a Higher Standard
Schenker et al. (2014) argued that advertising for health care services raises ethical concerns beyond those of ordinary advertising. Patients often cannot evaluate claims about clinical outcomes, may be frightened or in pain when they see the messages, and may make consequential decisions based on them. Health care providers also hold professional duties of honesty that commercial sellers do not. The authors proposed that health care advertising be accurate, balanced in presenting benefits and risks, and supported by evidence, and that hospitals in particular avoid emotional appeals that exploit fear or exaggerate benefits.
The Legal Rules
Three bodies of law apply. First, the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibits deceptive advertising, and the FTC's guidance on health products explains that health-related claims need backing from what the agency calls competent and reliable scientific evidence, meaning tests or studies that experts in the field accept as yielding accurate results and that are relevant to the specific claim made (Federal Trade Commission, 2022). Qualifying a claim with fine print does not cure a misleading headline. Testimonials are treated as claims of typical results unless the advertiser has evidence that the results are typical or clearly discloses what most patients can expect.
Second, the federal anti-kickback law at 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b makes it a crime to offer or pay anything of value to induce the referral of, or the purchase of, items or services paid for by federal health programs. Third, the civil monetary penalty law, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a, bars offering Medicare or Medicaid patients anything of value the hospital knows, or ought to know, is likely to sway their choice of provider, with exceptions such as items of nominal value.
Claim-by-Claim Review
The review found that three of the six elements could not be used, two required qualification and one should be kept.
| Element | Concern | Finding |
|---|---|---|
| Less pain, faster recovery, smaller scars | Studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgery for these procedures show mixed differences; the hospital has no outcome data yet | Needs qualification; remove less pain and faster recovery |
| Region's number one choice for robotic surgery | No data support a ranking; another hospital performs more robotic cases | Remove |
| Patient back to work in three days | Testimonial implies typical result | Needs disclosure of typical recovery or remove |
| Robotic surgery is safer | Not supported for these procedures compared with laparoscopic surgery | Remove |
| $25 gift card for screening attendees | Likely to influence Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries' choice of provider; above nominal value | Remove |
| Spanish-language version | Expands access to information | Keep, with the same accuracy standards and professional translation |
Revised Wording
The revised headline reads: Robotic surgery is now available at Peachtree Valley. Ask your surgeon whether it is right for you. Supporting copy explains that robotic surgery uses small incisions, that recovery varies by procedure and patient, and that the hospital's surgeons completed training and supervised cases before operating independently. The testimonial remains with a clear statement that most patients in the hospital's program return to desk work within one to two weeks, a figure the hospital will verify after its first six months of cases. Comparative and safety claims are removed until the hospital has its own outcome data.
The Screening Event
The screening event can serve the community without the gift card. Free parking, light refreshments and educational materials are permitted as items of nominal value, and the event can be promoted as a chance to ask surgeons questions. Attendees who need surgery will be told that they may choose any qualified surgeon, and the hospital will not track event attendance against later surgical volume in a way that rewards staff for referrals.
Why the Robot Claims Matter Most
Of the six elements, the clinical claims carry the greatest risk to patients. A reader who believes robotic surgery is safer or less painful may press a surgeon for it when a traditional laparoscopic operation would serve equally well, or may travel past a hospital with more experienced surgeons to reach a robot. Surgical outcomes depend heavily on the surgeon's experience and the patient's condition, and a new program has not yet built its own record. Honest marketing for a new technology tells patients what is available and invites a conversation with their surgeon, rather than promising results the program cannot yet show.
A Standing Review Process
To prevent similar problems, the hospital should adopt a three-step review for all clinical marketing. First, the service line's medical director confirms that every clinical claim is supported by evidence and the hospital's own data. Second, the compliance officer reviews any offer of value to patients or referral sources. Third, the marketing director checks the final materials for balance and plain language. A log of approved claims and their evidence will be kept and updated annually.
Conclusion
The draft campaign would have exaggerated benefits, made unsupported comparative claims and offered an inducement that federal law restricts. Ethical analysis explains why health care advertising must meet a higher standard, and FTC guidance and federal statutes define specific limits. Revised, the campaign can still inform the community about a new service honestly, and a standing review process can keep future campaigns within those limits.
References
Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (1972).
Civil Monetary Penalties Law, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a (1981).
Federal Trade Commission. (2022). Health products compliance guidance. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/health-products-compliance-guidance
Schenker, Y., Arnold, R. M., & London, A. J. (2014). The ethics of advertising for health care services. American Journal of Bioethics, 14(3), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.879943
Reading the BUS 532 Module 7 assignment instructions
Aspen's catalog for BUS 532 covers applying marketing principles responsibly in health care, and an ethics and regulation module usually asks students to evaluate a marketing practice or campaign against ethical principles and legal rules. Follow the Module 7 directions in your classroom; this example reviews one campaign before launch. Describe the campaign and its goals. Identify the ethical principles that apply to marketing health services, with research. Identify the relevant laws and guidance, cite them precisely and explain what they require. Review each claim or offer individually, deciding whether it is supported, misleading or prohibited. Propose revised wording or alternatives that achieve the goal lawfully and honestly. Recommend a process that prevents similar problems, and note that a legal review by qualified counsel is still required.
How this BUS 532 Module 7 example is built
The paper begins with Peachtree Valley Medical Center's investment in a surgical robot and the marketing team's draft campaign. Schenker, Arnold and London's American Journal of Bioethics article argues that health care advertising should be held to standards of accuracy and balance because patients are vulnerable and information is asymmetric. The FTC's 2022 health products compliance guidance explains the evidence needed for health claims and the need to qualify claims carefully. Federal rules against paying for referrals and against rewarding Medicare and Medicaid patients for choosing a provider are explained with their sections of the U.S. Code. A six-row table rates each element as supported, needs qualification or remove. Revised copy replaces less pain with what the hospital's own data show. The gift card is replaced by free parking and refreshments, and a three-step review process closes the paper.
BUS 532 Module 7 rubric: what earns full marks
Ethics and regulation papers in an MBA healthcare marketing course are graded on accurate identification of principles and laws, careful application to specific claims, practical alternatives and a sound process. This example cites the ethical argument from Schenker, Arnold and London's article in the American Journal of Bioethics, the FTC's own guidance document for the evidence standard and the statutes by section, so each rule is traceable. The review table evaluates claims one at a time, which is how compliance review actually works and how graders can see the reasoning. Revised wording shows that marketing goals can often be met honestly. The paper notes that it is a learning example and that counsel must review the final campaign, which demonstrates professional judgment about the limits of a manager's role.
BUS 532 Module 7 help: mistakes that cost marks
The most common weakness in Module 7 is discussing ethics in general terms without testing specific claims. Review each claim or offer separately. Another is citing laws vaguely; name the statute or guidance and explain what it requires. Remember that superlatives such as best or first and outcome claims such as less pain need evidence that applies to the organization itself, not just to the technology in general. Be careful with anything of value offered to patients, since gifts can create legal problems in health care that would be harmless in retail. Propose alternatives rather than only removing content. Address both ethics and law, since some legal messages are still misleading. Close by noting that a lawyer, not the marketing team, gives the final sign-off.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More BUS 532 and MBA sample papers
- BUS 532 Module 1: Marketing in Health Care
- BUS 532 Module 2: The Health Care Marketplace
- BUS 532 Module 3: Patients, Referrers and Payers
- BUS 532 Module 4: Segmentation and Service Lines
- BUS 532 Module 5: Pricing, Access and Value
- BUS 532 Module 6: Digital Marketing and Reputation
- BUS 532 Module 8: Health Care Marketing Plan
- BUS 550 Module 5: Risk and Return
- BUS 553 Module 5: Managing Currency Exposure
- BUS 530 Module 4: Segmentation and Positioning
- BUS 540 Module 5: Oligopoly and Strategy
BUS 532 Module 7 questions, answered
What does BUS 532 Module 7 usually ask for?
Aspen's BUS 532 covers ethics and regulation in health care marketing in this module, so evaluating a campaign or practice against ethical principles and laws is typical. Check your classroom prompt.
What evidence does the FTC require for health claims?
The FTC's guidance says health-related claims must be supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence, generally high-quality studies relevant to the specific claim.
Can a hospital give gifts to patients to attend events?
Gifts to Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries that are likely to influence their choice of provider can violate federal law unless they fall within narrow exceptions, so hospitals should be cautious.
Where can I find a free BUS 532 Module 7 sample paper?
The full review is posted above: a hospital's robotic surgery campaign tested claim by claim against ethics research, FTC guidance and federal law, with revised wording.
Is it misleading to advertise new technology?
Not if claims are accurate and balanced, but claims about better outcomes must be supported by evidence that applies to the patients and procedures in question.