| Course | COM 220 Management Communication |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 7 |
| Paper type | Business report analysis and redesign |
| Length | About 1,051 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for COM 220 Module 7
Answer First: Rewriting a Quarterly Property Report So Owners Can Read It in Two Minutes
Student Name
Business Administration Program, Aspen University
COM 220: Management Communication
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Answer First: Rewriting a Quarterly Property Report So Owners Can Read It in Two Minutes
Every quarter, Tasha Greene sends the owners of her nine Tampa communities a report on performance. The report she inherited from her predecessor runs fourteen pages. It opens with two pages on the Tampa rental market, moves through each community in alphabetical order with a pie chart of unit mix and expenses, and reaches the quarter's most important finding, that resident renewals at Bay Crest and Palm Hollow fell below 45%, on page eleven. Two owners have told Tasha they skim it. This paper explains how she will rewrite it.
The Reader
The owners are investors who receive reports from several managers. They want to know three things quickly: whether their properties are on track, what has changed and whether anything needs their decision. They are comfortable with numbers but have little time. The report should serve those needs in its first page.
Answer First
Minto (2009) developed the pyramid principle for business writing. Readers, she argued, understand ideas most easily when the main point, the governing thought, comes first and the supporting ideas are grouped beneath it, each group summarizing the ideas below it. Ideas at each level should be logically related, either as a sequence of reasons or as a set of similar points. The introduction should orient the reader by describing the situation, the complication that creates a question and the question the document answers, and then give the answer.
For Tasha's report, the situation is that the region is performing above budget overall. The complication is that renewals at two communities have fallen. The question is what is being done. The answer comes in the first sentence: "The region beat its budget this quarter, but renewals at Bay Crest and Palm Hollow fell below 45%, and we are changing how those communities handle renewals."
Before and After
| Old report | New report | |
|---|---|---|
| First sentence | Tampa's rental market remained competitive | The region beat its budget, but renewals fell at two communities |
| Order | Market, then nine communities alphabetically | Summary, then problems, then communities ranked by attention needed |
| Length | Fourteen pages | One-page summary plus four pages; appendix |
| Headings | Community names | Findings, such as "Bay Crest renewals fell to 43%" |
| Charts | Twelve pie charts | Two dot charts; tables in appendix |
| Language | "Utilize," "facilitate," "drive synergies" | "Use," "help," named actions |
Plain Words
Oppenheimer (2006) conducted experiments in which participants read texts such as graduate school admission essays and dissertation abstracts in original and modified versions. When words were replaced with longer, more complex synonyms, readers judged the authors as less intelligent, not more. The effect came from the reduced fluency of reading: harder text was attributed to a less capable writer. Simplifying already complex text made authors seem more intelligent.
The old report was full of phrases meant to sound professional, such as "we continue to facilitate optimization of resident engagement initiatives." The new report says what happened: "We called every resident whose lease ends in the next ninety days."
Charts Readers Can Read
Cleveland and McGill (1984) studied graphical perception, the visual decoding of information in graphs. In experiments, they asked people to judge quantities shown in different ways and ranked the elementary perceptual tasks by accuracy. Position along a common scale was most accurate, followed by position along nonaligned scales, then length, angle and slope, then area, volume and color. They recommended designing graphs that use the more accurate tasks.
Pie charts require judgments of angle and area, which are less accurate. The new report replaces the twelve pie charts with two dot charts. One shows renewal rates for all nine communities on a common scale, with the target marked. The other shows occupancy for each community this quarter and last.
The One-Page Summary
The summary has three findings, each a sentence with a number: the region beat its net operating income budget by 3.1%; occupancy rose to 95.4%; renewals at Bay Crest and Palm Hollow fell to 43% and 44%. It then lists the actions taken and one item for the owners' attention: the kitchen renovation request from Module 6.
Headings That Say Something
In the old report, headings were community names: "Bay Crest," "Cypress Point," "Palm Hollow." A reader skimming them learned nothing. In the new report, each heading states a finding, such as "Bay Crest renewals fell to 43% after two maintenance staff left" or "Cypress Point occupancy held at 97% for the third quarter." Following Minto, each heading summarizes the paragraphs beneath it, so an owner who reads only the headings still gets the report's argument.
Ordering the Communities
Alphabetical order treated every community as equally urgent. The new report orders them by how much attention they need: the two communities with falling renewals first, then any community missing budget, then the rest briefly. An owner who stops reading after page two will have read about every problem.
What Moves to the Appendix
Unit mix, expense detail by line item and the market survey still matter to the asset managers, who use them for their own models. They move to an appendix with plain tables, where they are available but no longer stand between owners and the findings.
Testing the Draft
Before sending, Tasha will give the new report to Rob Delgado, who has not seen the data, and ask him to tell her in two minutes what the report says and what it asks of owners. If he cannot, the summary needs work.
A Template for Future Reports
Tasha will use the same structure every quarter, so owners know where to look. The template fixes the order of the summary, the problem sections and the community sections, sets a limit of five pages before the appendix and lists the two charts that always appear. Each quarter, she will ask one owner for a sentence of feedback on whether the report gave them what they needed, and adjust the template once a year rather than every quarter, so the format stays familiar.
Conclusion
Minto's pyramid puts the answer where owners will see it, Oppenheimer shows that plain words make Tasha seem more capable, and Cleveland and McGill show that dot charts beat pie charts for accuracy. A one-page summary with findings first turns a report owners skimmed into one they can use.
References
Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
Minto, B. (2009). The pyramid principle: Logic in writing and thinking (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2006). Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1178
COM 220 Module 7 instructions, in plain terms
COM 220 Module 7 turns to business reports, and students commonly write or revise a report and explain the choices behind its structure, language and visuals. Your Module 7 classroom page governs; this example uses a composite report. Identify the reader and what the reader needs to decide. Structure the report around its main conclusion. Write in plain language. Choose graphics that readers can interpret accurately. Explain your choices with research. Provide the revised report or its key parts, and say what moves to an appendix. Cite sources in APA 7 form.
How the COM 220 Module 7 example is put together
Harborline's owners read reports from many managers and want to know quickly whether their properties are on track and what needs their attention. Minto's book The Pyramid Principle describes starting with the governing thought, supporting it with grouped arguments and introducing it with a situation, complication and question. Oppenheimer's Applied Cognitive Psychology article reported experiments in which texts with needlessly long words were rated as written by less intelligent authors. Cleveland and McGill's Journal of the American Statistical Association article ranked graphical tasks by accuracy, with position along a common scale most accurate and angle, area and color less so. The before and after table moves the renewal problem from page eleven to the first sentence. The one-page summary states three findings, each with a number, and two dot charts replace four pie charts. Detailed tables move to an appendix.
COM 220 Module 7 rubric: what earns full marks
Report papers score well when the revised report clearly serves its reader and every change is justified. This example identifies what owners need, uses Minto to put the answer first, uses Oppenheimer to justify plain language and uses Cleveland and McGill to replace pie charts with charts readers judge accurately. The before and after table makes the improvement visible, and the one-page summary shows the result. A template for future reports turns one revision into a lasting habit, which instructors tend to value over a single polished document. Headings that state findings and an order based on urgency show the writer thinking about how owners actually read.
Common COM 220 Module 7 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Report papers often follow the order in which the writer did the work, ending with the conclusion. Put the main conclusion first, then support it. Another weakness is complex language meant to sound professional; plain words are clearer and, research suggests, make writers seem more capable. Choose charts that readers judge accurately, such as bars and dots, over pies. Move detail to an appendix. Write headings that state findings, so a reader skimming them still gets the argument. Finally, test the report on a reader who did not write it. Order sections by how much attention they need rather than by habit or the alphabet.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More COM 220 and Business Administration sample papers
- COM 220 Module 1: The Manager's Communication Role
- COM 220 Module 2: Audience, Purpose and Channel
- COM 220 Module 3: Routine and Bad-News Messages
- COM 220 Module 4: Communication in Hiring and Promotion
- COM 220 Module 5: Conflict and Difficult Conversations
- COM 220 Module 6: Presentations
- COM 220 Module 8: Persuasive Proposals
- BUS 320 Module 5: Pricing Decisions
- COM 140 Module 7: Team Conflict and Decisions
- MGT 464 Module 3: Teams and Team Effectiveness
- BUS 454 Module 3: Stakeholder Mapping
COM 220 Module 7 questions, answered
What does COM 220 Module 7 usually ask for?
Aspen's COM 220 turns to business reports in this module, so writing or revising a report and explaining its structure, language and visuals is typical. Read your classroom prompt.
What is the pyramid principle?
Minto's method of putting the main conclusion first, supporting it with grouped arguments and introducing it by situation, complication and question.
Do long words make writing sound smarter?
No. Oppenheimer found that needlessly complex vocabulary led readers to judge writers as less intelligent.
Where can I find a free COM 220 Module 7 sample paper?
The example above rewrites a quarterly property report for owners, with a one-page summary and redesigned charts.
Which charts do readers interpret most accurately?
Cleveland and McGill found that judgments of position along a common scale, as in bar and dot charts, were more accurate than judgments of angle or area, as in pie charts.