HCA 405 Module 8 Analyzing and Improving an Office System Example

Reviewed by Douglas Renshaw, MBA Aspen University Updated September 2026

This HCA 405 Module 8 sample paper analyzes and redesigns the prescription refill system at a composite practice. It completes the set for Medical Office Management, the Aspen University course that explores office systems and functions. A team of a physician, a medical assistant and a front desk member mapped eleven steps and four handoffs, then logged two weeks of requests: 2.6 business days average turnaround, 31% repeat calls and about 25 refill messages per physician a day. Three root causes led to a protocol-based redesign with a single queue and automatic patient messages. A before-and-after table shows turnaround falling to 0.8 days. Testing, staff experience informed by lean redesign research, safety safeguards, costs, patient outcomes and the next system follow.

CourseHCA 405 Medical Office Management
ModuleModule 8
Paper typeOffice system redesign paper
LengthAbout 1,028 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramHealth Care Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCA 405 Module 8

1

Fixing the Refill Loop: Analyzing and Redesigning a Prescription Refill System

Student Name

Health Care Administration Program, Aspen University

HCA 405: Medical Office Management

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title names the system and suggests its problem, requests that cycled without resolution. APA 7 student title page.
2

Fixing the Refill Loop: Analyzing and Redesigning a Prescription Refill System

Office systems are the routines that turn requests into results: scheduling, check-in, referrals, refills and billing. When a system is poorly designed, staff work harder and patients wait longer. This paper analyzes the prescription refill system at a composite eight-provider practice, identifies its problems, describes a redesign and reports the results.

Why Refills

Staff and physicians named refills as their most frustrating system. Patients called repeatedly to ask about requests, physicians received refill messages throughout the day, and some patients ran out of chronic medicines. Refill messages land in inboxes that are already crowded; a study of one large medical group counted about 243 inbox messages per physician each week and found that doctors flooded with automated messages were more likely to report burnout (Tai-Seale et al., 2019).

Mapping the Current Process

The manager and a small team of a physician, a medical assistant and a front desk member mapped every step of a refill request. Requests arrived by phone, pharmacy fax and portal. Front desk staff took phone messages and routed them to medical assistants, who pulled the chart and routed to the physician, who approved or asked questions, after which the assistant sent the prescription and someone was supposed to tell the patient. The map showed eleven steps and four handoffs.

Measuring the Problem

For two weeks, the team logged every refill request. Average turnaround was 2.6 business days, 31% of requests generated a second patient call and physicians handled about 25 refill messages a day each. Most requests, about 80%, were for stable chronic medications with recent visits and normal labs.

Root Causes

The team found three root causes. Every request went to the physician, even routine ones. Requests arrived through three channels with no single queue. No one owned telling the patient when the refill was sent. Each cause added delay and repeat calls.

What this page is doingSeparating root causes from symptoms focuses the redesign on why delays happen, not only on where they appear.
3

The Redesign

The redesigned system uses a physician-approved protocol that lets medical assistants refill stable chronic medications when the patient was seen within the past year and required labs are current. All requests flow into one electronic queue regardless of channel. The patient receives an automatic portal or text message when the prescription is sent. Requests outside the protocol go to the physician with the relevant information already attached.

Before and After

The table compares the old and new systems.

MeasureBeforeAfter three months
Steps116
Handoffs41 for protocol refills
Average turnaround2.6 business days0.8 business days
Requests with repeat calls31%9%
Physician refill messages per dayAbout 25About 6

Testing Before Spreading

The team tested the redesign with two physicians and one medical assistant for four weeks, adjusting the protocol after finding that some blood pressure medicines needed a recent reading. Only then was it spread to all physicians. Testing on a small scale caught problems cheaply.

Staff Experience

Workflow redesigns can have mixed effects on staff. In a study of lean workflow redesign in primary care, physicians and staff reported more engagement and teamwork afterward but also more burnout and workplace stress, with stress rising most among physicians and in clinics other than the pilot site (Hung et al., 2018). Aware of this, the manager added medical assistant hours to absorb the protocol work, trained assistants before launch and checked in with staff weekly.

Why Work Redesign Helps

Fixing frustrating workflows can reduce burnout. A randomized clinic trial found that changes to everyday workflow did more to ease burnout than leaving work unchanged (Linzer et al., 2015). The refill redesign aimed at exactly the kind of daily friction that wears staff and physicians down.

Safety Safeguards

Protocols must be safe. The protocol excludes controlled substances, new medications and patients with abnormal recent results. Each assistant's protocol refills are audited monthly for the first six months. Physicians can see all protocol refills in a daily report.

Sustaining the Change

The team reviews refill measures monthly and updates the protocol when guidelines change. New medical assistants train on the protocol during onboarding. The manager will apply the same approach, mapping, measuring, finding root causes, redesigning, testing and measuring again, to the next system, likely incoming phone calls.

Lessons for Managers

Three lessons stand out. Involve the people who do the work, since they know where it breaks. Measure before and after, so improvement is visible. Watch for side effects on staff, because a faster process can still be a more stressful one if work is shifted without support.

Choosing the Next System

After refills, the team ranked other systems by frustration and effect on patients: incoming phone calls, same-day appointment requests and results notification. Phone calls ranked highest, because morning hold times drove complaints and missed calls. The same method will be applied there.

Communicating the Change

Patients were told about the new refill process through the portal, a sign at checkout and a line on after-visit summaries: allow one business day for refills, and watch for a message when the prescription is sent. Pharmacies received a fax explaining the single channel. Clear communication reduced calls during the transition.

Costs of the Redesign

The redesign required added medical assistant hours, protocol writing time from physicians and a few hours of configuration by the electronic record vendor. Against that, physicians saved time daily, and fewer repeat calls freed front desk staff. The manager estimated the added hours were covered by time saved elsewhere within three months.

Patient Outcomes

The team also watched for patients running out of medicines. Before the redesign, several patients a month reported gaps; after it, reports dropped to about one a month. Fewer gaps in chronic medicines mean better control of conditions such as blood pressure and diabetes.

Conclusion

The refill system at the composite practice had too many steps, too many handoffs and no clear owner of the final step. Mapping and measurement revealed root causes, and a protocol-based redesign with a single queue and automatic patient notification cut turnaround by two-thirds and repeat calls by more than two-thirds, while sharply reducing physicians' refill messages. Research on lean redesign reminded the manager to support staff through the change.

References

Hung, D. Y., Harrison, M. I., Truong, Q., & Du, X. (2018). Experiences of primary care physicians and staff following lean workflow redesign. BMC Health Services Research, 18, Article 274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3062-5

Linzer, M., Poplau, S., Grossman, E., Varkey, A., Yale, S., Williams, E., Hicks, L., Brown, R. L., Wallock, J., Kohnhorst, D., & Barbouche, M. (2015). A cluster randomized trial of interventions to improve work conditions and clinician burnout in primary care: Results from the Healthy Work Place (HWP) study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(8), 1105-1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3235-4

Tai-Seale, M., Dillon, E. C., Yang, Y., Nordgren, R., Steinberg, R. L., Nauenberg, T., Lee, T. C., Meehan, A., Li, J., Chan, A. S., & Frosch, D. L. (2019). Physicians' well-being linked to in-basket messages generated by algorithms in electronic health records. Health Affairs, 38(7), 1073-1078. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05509

HCA 405 Module 8 instructions, in plain terms

Office systems and functions appear in Aspen's HCA 405 catalog listing, and because each module's prompt is held for enrolled students, analyzing and improving one office system was chosen for this final example. System improvement assignments usually ask you to choose a process, map it, measure it, find causes and propose changes. Check whether your prompt names the system or tools such as a flowchart. Measure before and after if you describe a change. Include side effects on staff and safety, since graders look for awareness that a faster process is not automatically a better one. Involving the people who do the work in mapping gives a more accurate picture. Name the tools you used, such as a flowchart or a two-week log.

How the HCA 405 Module 8 example is put together

The paper covers about 1,030 words in eighteen sections, including a five-row before-and-after table. It explains why refills were chosen, maps the process, measures the problem and identifies root causes. The redesign and the comparison table follow, then testing before spreading, staff experience, why work redesign helps, safety safeguards, sustaining the change and lessons for managers. Choosing the next system, communicating the change, costs and patient outcomes close the body. A note beside the root causes section explains the focus on why delays happen rather than where they appear. Lessons for managers turn the case into guidance for any system. Communication with patients and pharmacies is covered as part of the change.

Reading the HCA 405 Module 8 grading rubric

System redesign papers tend to be graded on clear mapping, sound measurement, root cause analysis and realistic results. The process is mapped step by step. Measurements are specific and repeated after the change. Root causes are distinct from symptoms. Results are reported with a table. The lean redesign, workflow trial and inbox studies carry APA references. Extra credit usually goes to testing on a small scale and attention to staff and safety, which this paper includes. Costs and patient outcomes also show the redesign's value beyond speed. A plan for the next system shows improvement as an ongoing habit. Clear numbers in the table make results easy to verify.

HCA 405 Module 8 help from the desk

Students often propose solutions without mapping or measuring the current process. Start with the map and data. Another common gap is ignoring who does the new work; shifting tasks without support adds stress. Some papers also skip safety safeguards when delegating tasks. Measure results and name the next system. Once you have a process map, a tutor can walk through it with you and help you separate root causes from symptoms before you design the fix. Include how patients and partners such as pharmacies learn about the change. Report costs as well as benefits. Test on a small scale before spreading.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HCA 405 and Health Care Administration sample papers

HCA 405 Module 8 questions, answered

What does HCA 405 Module 8 usually ask for?

Aspen's HCA 405 description covers office systems and functions, so analyzing and improving one office system is a typical final assignment. Check your classroom prompt.

What is a process map?

A diagram or list of every step and handoff in a process, used to find delays and redundancies.

Can workflow redesign increase stress?

Yes. A study of lean redesign found more engagement and teamwork but also more reported stress, so managers should support staff through changes.

Where can I find a free HCA 405 Module 8 sample paper?

The refill system redesign, with its before-and-after table, is published above. It completes the eight HCA 405 samples.

What is a root cause in HCA 405 Module 8?

The underlying reason a problem occurs, such as routing every refill to the physician, as opposed to the symptom, such as slow turnaround.