| Course | MGT 424 Leadership |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Leader behavior paper |
| Length | About 1,080 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGT 424 Module 3
Spotless Rooms and an Empty Break Room: Task and Relations Behavior in a Hotel Housekeeping Supervisor
Student Name
Business Administration Program, Aspen University
MGT 424: Leadership
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Spotless Rooms and an Empty Break Room: Task and Relations Behavior in a Hotel Housekeeping Supervisor
The Riverwalk Plaza Hotel, a composite 220-room hotel in San Antonio, Texas, employs 34 room attendants who clean about 180 rooms on a typical day. Eight months ago, a new housekeeping supervisor arrived from a larger hotel in the same company. She introduced a 40-point room checklist, inspected every attendant's rooms daily and posted scores. Guest cleanliness ratings rose, and the hotel's internal inspection scores climbed from 86 to 95. But turnover among attendants rose to an annual rate of 70%, against 45% the year before, and exit interviews mention feeling watched and unappreciated. The general manager asked for an analysis of the supervisor's leadership behavior.
Two Classic Behaviors
Research at Ohio State in the mid-twentieth century reduced leader behavior to two broad kinds. Initiating structure covers a leader's work in defining roles, setting standards and organizing tasks. Consideration covers respect, warmth and concern for followers' welfare. Judge et al. (2004) revisited these two after decades of neglect, pooling about 160 correlations for each behavior. Consideration showed the stronger overall relationship with leadership outcomes, especially follower satisfaction with the leader, follower motivation and ratings of leader effectiveness. Initiating structure related somewhat more closely to the leader's job performance and to group or organizational performance. The authors concluded that both behaviors deserved renewed attention because each predicts different results.
The Grid
Blake and Mouton (1964) placed leadership styles on a grid with concern for production on one axis and concern for people on the other, each scored from 1 to 9. A 9,1 style focuses on output with little attention to people, a 1,9 style focuses on people at the expense of output, and a 9,9 style, which they favored, joins high standards with high regard for people through commitment and teamwork. The grid's value lies less in its scores than in naming two concerns a leader can hold together.
A Fuller Taxonomy
Yukl et al. (2002) argued that two categories omit an important kind of behavior. Their hierarchical taxonomy has three meta-categories. Task behaviors include short-term planning, clarifying roles and objectives and monitoring operations. Relations behaviors include supporting, recognizing, developing, consulting and empowering. Change behaviors include monitoring the environment, proposing innovative strategies, encouraging new thinking and taking risks for change.
What She Actually Did
Over ten working days, an HR specialist observed the supervisor during the morning assignment meeting and three walks through the floors each day, recording each distinct behavior.
| Category | Examples observed | Count |
|---|---|---|
| Task: clarifying | Explaining checklist items; assigning floors | 24 |
| Task: monitoring | Inspecting rooms; posting scores | 31 |
| Task: planning | Adjusting assignments for checkouts | 6 |
| Relations: supporting | Asking an attendant about a sick child | 3 |
| Relations: recognizing | Praising a perfect inspection | 4 |
| Relations: consulting | Asking how to speed up bathroom cleaning | 2 |
| Change | Proposing a new cart layout | 2 |
Reading the Pattern
On Blake and Mouton's grid, the supervisor sits near 9,2: very high concern for production, little expressed concern for people. Judge and colleagues' findings explain the results. Strong initiating structure clarified standards, and quality rose. Weak consideration left attendants feeling distrusted, and satisfaction and retention fell. The pattern is costly: replacing an attendant costs the hotel about $3,500 in hiring and training, so the added turnover costs about $30,000 a year, and new attendants clean rooms more slowly for their first two months.
Why the Pattern Formed
Her previous hotel measured supervisors on inspection scores alone, and she was promoted for raising them. She also arrived as an outsider, and checklists gave her a way to establish standards quickly without relying on relationships she did not yet have.
Recommended Behaviors
The plan keeps the structure that raised quality and adds relations behaviors. She will hold a ten-minute huddle each Monday to share hotel news, guest comments and a recognition for good work, and will thank at least three attendants by name each day for something specific. Inspections will shift from every room daily to a random sample of four rooms per attendant per week, with feedback delivered privately rather than posted. She will consult attendants on two decisions this quarter, cart setup and the assignment of difficult checkout rooms, which some attendants say always fall to the same people. And she will ask newer attendants each Friday what made their week harder.
What the Attendants Said
Group conversations with twelve attendants, held without the supervisor present, filled in the numbers. Several said the checklist itself was fair and had made expectations clearer than before. Their complaint was the posting of scores, which embarrassed people in front of coworkers, and the sense that the supervisor noticed only mistakes. Two long-serving attendants said they had stayed through three supervisors and were thinking of leaving for the first time. Others said difficult checkout rooms, with extra beds or pets, always went to the newest attendants, who then scored worst. Attendants' own words matched what Judge and colleagues' findings predict: structure was accepted, while the absence of consideration drove people away.
Keeping Change Behavior Alive
Yukl and colleagues' third category deserves a place in the plan. The two change behaviors observed, including the supervisor's idea for a new cart layout, came from her alone. Asking attendants for ideas, such as how to handle rooms with pets or how to shorten the time spent restocking carts, would combine consultation with change and give attendants a stake in improvements.
Practicing New Behaviors
Behaviors that do not come naturally need practice. The general manager will meet her every two weeks to review her recognition log and discuss what she observed. The HR specialist will repeat the observation after three months.
Costs and Expected Gains
The changes cost little in money. The Monday huddle uses ten minutes already spent on assignments, and sampling rooms instead of inspecting all of them frees about an hour of the supervisor's day for coaching. If turnover returned to last year's 45%, the hotel would save roughly $30,000 a year in hiring and training.
Measures
Success will be measured by turnover, inspection scores, guest cleanliness ratings and a short attendant survey on whether they feel respected and informed.
Conclusion
The supervisor's checklists showed the value of initiating structure, raising quality quickly. Her near-absence of consideration shows its cost, in line with Judge, Piccolo and Ilies's finding that consideration drives follower satisfaction. Blake and Mouton's grid and Yukl and colleagues' taxonomy point to behaviors she can add without lowering standards: support, recognition and consultation.
References
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Gulf Publishing.
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.36
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900102
Reading the MGT 424 Module 3 assignment instructions
Behavioral approaches in Aspen's MGT 424 ask what leaders actually do, and the paper for this module usually applies them to a real leader's conduct. Your classroom's Module 3 wording should guide the details; this example observes one supervisor. Summarize research on leader behavior, including task-oriented and relations-oriented behaviors and their effects. Describe a leader's behavior with specific, observed examples rather than general impressions. Classify the behavior using a recognized framework. Explain how the pattern affects followers and results, using data such as quality scores or turnover. Recommend specific behaviors to add or change, and describe how the leader will practice them and how improvement will be judged.
How this MGT 424 Module 3 example is built
The paper opens with the housekeeping department at the Riverwalk Plaza Hotel, where 34 room attendants clean about 180 rooms a day. The new supervisor introduced a 40-point checklist and daily inspections. Judge, Piccolo and Ilies's Journal of Applied Psychology meta-analysis found consideration related more strongly than initiating structure to follower satisfaction and motivation, while both related to performance. Blake and Mouton's managerial grid places styles on concern for production and concern for people. Yukl, Gordon and Taber's Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies article sorts behaviors into task, relations and change categories. A table tallies two weeks of observations: 61 task behaviors, 9 relations behaviors and 2 change behaviors. The plan adds a weekly team huddle, daily recognition, consultation on cart setup and a rotation for difficult rooms.
Where the marks sit in the MGT 424 Module 3 rubric
Behavior papers earn credit for observed evidence, accurate use of behavioral research and recommendations that name behaviors rather than traits. This example counts behaviors over two weeks, so the pattern is shown rather than asserted. Judge, Piccolo and Ilies's meta-analysis explains why strong structure raised quality but weak consideration hurt retention. Blake and Mouton's grid offers a familiar picture, and Yukl and colleagues' taxonomy adds the change behaviors the grid lacks. The table supports the diagnosis. Recommendations specify behaviors, frequency and how progress will be measured, and they draw on attendants' own words gathered without the supervisor present.
MGT 424 Module 3 help from the desk
Leader behavior papers often describe a leader's personality instead of behavior. Record what the leader actually does and says, and count it if possible. Another weakness is concluding that relations behavior is good and task behavior bad; research shows both matter, for different outcomes. Use a taxonomy that includes change behaviors as well. Link behavior patterns to measurable results, such as quality and turnover. Recommend specific actions, such as a weekly meeting or daily recognition, with how often they will occur. Avoid recommending that the leader become a different person. Finally, describe how improvement will be measured. Hear from followers directly, without the leader present, so the analysis reflects their experience.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MGT 424 and Business Administration sample papers
- MGT 424 Module 1: What Leadership Is
- MGT 424 Module 2: Traits and Skills of Leaders
- MGT 424 Module 4: Situational and Contingency Leadership
- MGT 424 Module 5: Transformational and Servant Leadership
- MGT 424 Module 6: Power, Influence and Ethics
- MGT 424 Module 7: Leading Change
- MGT 424 Module 8: Personal Leadership Development Plan
- BUS 225 Module 8: Consumer Protection and Securities
- BUS 454 Module 2: Ethical Frameworks
- BUS 484 Module 8: Business Plan and Pitch
- MGT 215 Module 6: Service Recovery and Complaints
MGT 424 Module 3 questions, answered
What does MGT 424 Module 3 usually ask for?
Aspen's MGT 424 covers behavioral approaches in this module, so analyzing a leader's actual behavior with research on task and relations behaviors is typical. Read your classroom prompt.
What are consideration and initiating structure?
Two broad leader behaviors from the Ohio State studies: consideration is showing concern and respect for followers, initiating structure is organizing roles and tasks.
Which matters more, consideration or initiating structure?
Judge, Piccolo and Ilies found consideration related more strongly to follower satisfaction and motivation, while both related to performance.
Where can I find a free MGT 424 Module 3 sample paper?
The complete paper above classifies a hotel housekeeping supervisor's observed behavior and recommends a better balance of task and relations behaviors.
What is the managerial grid?
Blake and Mouton's model placing leadership styles on two axes, concern for production and concern for people, with high concern for both seen as ideal.