| Course | MPH 520 Disaster Management and Emergency Preparedness |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Surge and crisis care paper |
| Length | About 1,041 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Master of Public Health |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for MPH 520 Module 6
When Demand Exceeds Supply: Medical Surge Planning and Crisis Standards of Care
Student Name
Master of Public Health Program, Aspen University
MPH 520: Disaster Management and Emergency Preparedness
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
When Demand Exceeds Supply: Medical Surge Planning and Crisis Standards of Care
In a catastrophic disaster, the number of patients can exceed the capacity of hospitals to give every patient the usual level of care. Planning for that moment is one of the most difficult tasks in public health preparedness, combining logistics, law and ethics. This paper examines medical surge planning and crisis standards of care, drawing on a national framework and on allocation principles developed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Continuum of Care
A national framework describes a continuum of care during surges. Conventional care uses usual spaces, staff and supplies. Contingency care adapts them in ways that are functionally equivalent to usual care, such as using recovery rooms for inpatients. Crisis care is a substantial change in usual operations and the level of care, made necessary by a catastrophic disaster, and requires a formal declaration and planned standards (Institute of Medicine, 2012).
Surge Strategies
Surge capacity is often described in terms of staff, stuff, space and systems. The table lists strategies in each.
| Element | Contingency strategies | Crisis strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Staff | Overtime, cancel elective procedures, cross-train | Expand scope of practice, team-based care with fewer specialists |
| Stuff | Conserve, substitute, reuse where safe | Reallocate ventilators and scarce drugs by protocol |
| Space | Use recovery rooms and hallways for monitored beds | Use non-clinical spaces; alternate care sites |
| Systems | Regional transfer coordination | Formal crisis declaration and triage teams |
The Role of Public Health
Health departments coordinate regional surge through health care coalitions, track hospital capacity, request federal resources, support alternate care sites and, with state officials, issue declarations that activate crisis standards. They also lead public engagement on how scarce resources will be allocated, which is essential to legitimacy. This whole-system role reflects the view of preparedness as a shared capability of health systems, agencies and communities (Nelson et al., 2007).
Ethical Principles for Allocation
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, ethicists proposed principles for allocating scarce resources such as ventilators and intensive care beds. They recommended maximizing benefits, measured as lives and life-years saved; prioritizing health workers who care for patients; rejecting first-come, first-served allocation; responding to evolving evidence; recognizing research participation; and applying the same principles to all patients, whether or not they had COVID-19 (Emanuel et al., 2020).
Triage in Practice
Many state plans used triage scores based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, sometimes adjusted for major coexisting conditions, to estimate likelihood of short-term survival. Triage teams separate from treating clinicians made allocation decisions, and patients were reassessed at set intervals so that resources could be reallocated if a patient was not improving. Protocols also specified that patients who were not allocated a ventilator would still receive all other appropriate care, including comfort measures, so that triage never meant abandonment.
Equity Concerns
Critics warned that scoring tools could disadvantage people with disabilities and Black patients, whose scores may reflect chronic conditions shaped by unequal access to care rather than the chance of surviving the acute illness. Some states revised plans to remove long-term life expectancy criteria, bar decisions based on disability and use scores focused on short-term survival. Equity must be designed into crisis standards, not assumed.
Legal Protections
Clinicians working under crisis standards need legal clarity. States can issue declarations that recognize crisis standards and provide liability protections for good-faith decisions made under them. Without such protections, clinicians may hesitate to follow allocation protocols, undermining consistency and fairness.
Avoiding Crisis Care
The best crisis standard is one that is never needed. Regional load balancing, transferring patients from full hospitals to those with capacity, can delay or prevent crisis care. During COVID-19, some regions used central transfer centers to track beds in real time and move patients before any hospital had to ration care.
A Composite Regional Plan
A composite region of 1.2 million people developed a surge plan with three triggers based on regional intensive care occupancy: 85% activates contingency strategies; 95% activates regional load balancing and alternate care sites; and 100% with no transfer options allows a state declaration of crisis standards. The plan specifies triage team composition, a scoring approach focused on short-term survival, an appeals process and daily public reporting of regional capacity.
Engaging the Public
Allocation plans developed without public input may be seen as illegitimate when used. The region held public forums with disability advocates, faith leaders and community organizations while drafting its plan, published the plan in plain language and committed to revisiting it after any activation. Forums were held in several languages and at times working people could attend.
Stockpiles and Supply Chains
Shortages of ventilators, masks and drugs during COVID-19 revealed fragile supply chains. The federal stockpile, state caches and hospital reserves provide some buffer, but plans must also address rapid procurement, allocation among hospitals and conservation strategies. Tracking supplies regionally allows shortages to be seen and addressed early.
Staffing Under Strain
Staff shortages often limit capacity more than beds or equipment. Strategies include recruiting retired clinicians, using students under supervision, sharing staff across hospitals and adjusting licensure rules. Staff well-being, including rest and mental health support, must be protected so that the workforce lasts through a prolonged surge.
Communication With Patients and Families
Patients and families deserve to know when crisis standards are in effect and how decisions are made. Clear explanations, palliative care for patients who do not receive critical care and support for grieving families are part of ethical crisis care.
Pediatric and Special Populations
Surge plans often focus on adults, but children, pregnant patients and people needing dialysis or burn care have distinct needs. Regional plans should identify pediatric and specialty capacity and arrangements for transferring these patients when local hospitals are full.
Learning After Activation
Any activation of crisis standards should be followed by a review of decisions, outcomes by group and staff experience. Reviews help identify unintended disparities and refine protocols before the next emergency.
Conclusion
Medical surge planning moves from conventional through contingency to crisis care as demand grows. Public health coordinates regional resources to delay crisis care and, when it cannot be avoided, helps ensure that allocation follows transparent, ethical and equitable standards with legal protection and public engagement. Planning these decisions in calm times is the only way to make them fairly in a crisis.
References
Emanuel, E. J., Persad, G., Upshur, R., Thome, B., Parker, M., Glickman, A., Zhang, C., Boyle, C., Smith, M., & Phillips, J. P. (2020). Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(21), 2049-2055. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2005114
Institute of Medicine. (2012). Crisis standards of care: A systems framework for catastrophic disaster response. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13351
Nelson, C., Lurie, N., Wasserman, J., & Zakowski, S. (2007). Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness. American Journal of Public Health, 97(Suppl. 1), S9-S11. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.114496
Reading the MPH 520 Module 6 assignment instructions
The MPH 520 catalog entry covers containing disasters, and since the sixth module's prompt is posted only in the classroom, this sample tackles what happens when patients outnumber resources. Surge and crisis standards assignments typically ask you to explain the care continuum, surge strategies, ethical allocation principles and public health's coordinating role. Check whether your instructor expects a state's actual crisis standards plan to be analyzed. Define each level of care clearly. Use a recognized ethical framework. Discuss equity and legal protection, since both drew attention during COVID-19. Explain how regional coordination can delay or prevent crisis care. Describe how the public would be involved. Keep the discussion grounded in a realistic regional scenario.
Inside the MPH 520 Module 6 example
The paper totals roughly 1,000 words across sixteen headings, including a three-column surge strategy table. It defines the continuum, tables strategies, explains public health's role and presents ethical allocation principles and triage. Equity concerns, legal protections, avoiding crisis care, a composite regional plan and public engagement follow, along with stockpiles and supply chains, staffing, communication with families, special populations and review after activation. The margin note beside the continuum explains that defining the three levels first makes later sections easier to follow. The conclusion stresses planning allocation decisions in calm times. The occupancy triggers in the regional plan are stated as numbers, not general terms. Principles are stated before the plan applies them.
Reading the MPH 520 Module 6 grading rubric
Papers on surge and crisis standards are usually judged on accurate definitions, practical surge strategies, sound ethical reasoning, attention to equity and law, and a coherent plan. This sample draws on the national crisis standards framework, published allocation principles and a definition of preparedness, all in APA format. The strategy table separates contingency from crisis measures. Ethical principles are summarized accurately and then tested against equity concerns. The regional plan includes triggers, triage, appeals and reporting. Graders reward papers that show why transparency and public input make allocation legitimate. Accurate description of what triage teams do, and how patients are reassessed, adds credibility. Showing how the plan would be explained to the public completes the argument for legitimacy.
MPH 520 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students sometimes treat crisis standards as a clinical triage question alone, leaving out public health's role and legal authority. Others present one allocation rule without discussing who might be disadvantaged. Cover the continuum, the ethics and the equity concerns together. Use a state plan as a real example if you can find one. If ethical frameworks feel abstract, a tutor can talk through how each principle would apply to two patients in your scenario. Conclude with how your plan would earn public trust before it is ever used. Avoid presenting any allocation rule as settled; note where experts and advocates disagree. Describe how an appeal would work, since graders often ask.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MPH 520 and Master of Public Health sample papers
- MPH 520 Module 1: Public Health and the Disaster Cycle
- MPH 520 Module 2: Hazard Vulnerability Analysis
- MPH 520 Module 3: Incident Command and Mass Casualties
- MPH 520 Module 4: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication
- MPH 520 Module 5: Extreme Heat Response Plan
- MPH 520 Module 7: Recovery and Disaster Mental Health
- MPH 520 Module 8: Emergency Preparedness Plan
- MPH 503 Module 2: How a Public Health Bill Becomes Law
- MPH 560 Module 4: Hypothesis Testing and P Values
- MPH 510 Module 1: Descriptive Epidemiology
- MPH 540 Module 6: Public-Private Health Partnerships
MPH 520 Module 6 questions, answered
What does MPH 520 Module 6 usually ask for?
Aspen's MPH 520 covers responding to and containing disasters, so a paper on medical surge and crisis standards of care is a typical assignment. Check your classroom prompt.
What is the difference between contingency and crisis care?
Contingency care adapts resources while keeping care functionally equivalent to usual; crisis care is a substantial change in the level of care made necessary by a catastrophic disaster.
What are staff, stuff, space and systems?
The four elements of surge capacity: personnel, supplies and equipment, physical space, and coordination structures.
Where can I find a free MPH 520 Module 6 sample paper?
The surge and crisis standards paper is here in full, with a staff, stuff, space and systems strategy table.
What are crisis standards of care in MPH 520 Module 6?
A substantial change in usual care made necessary by a catastrophic disaster, activated by formal declaration and guided by planned, ethical allocation rules.