| Course | MPH 540 Public Health Administration |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Public-private partnership paper |
| Length | About 1,045 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Master of Public Health |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for MPH 540 Module 6
Better Together: Building Public-Private Partnerships Between Health Departments and Hospitals
Student Name
Master of Public Health Program, Aspen University
MPH 540: Public Health Administration
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Better Together: Building Public-Private Partnerships Between Health Departments and Hospitals
Health departments cannot improve community health alone. Hospitals, insurers, employers, nonprofits and faith organizations all shape health and control resources. Of these, nonprofit hospitals have a special obligation, because their tax exemption requires them to benefit the community. This paper examines partnerships between health departments and nonprofit hospitals, reviews evidence on hospital community benefit spending and describes a composite county's shared approach.
The Community Benefit Obligation
A nonprofit hospital keeps its tax exemption only by giving something back to the community it serves. Under 26 U.S.C. § 501(r), added to the Internal Revenue Code in 2010, a tax-exempt hospital must repeat a formal review of local health needs every third year and adopt a written response plan, among other conditions. The assessment requirement creates a natural opening for partnership with health departments, which must conduct their own community health assessments for accreditation.
How Hospitals Spend Community Benefit
A national study of tax-exempt hospitals found that community benefits in 2009 amounted to about one dollar in every thirteen of hospital operating costs, and that the bulk paid for free or discounted treatment and related patient services rather than community programs. Only about 5% of the remainder was devoted to community health improvements hospitals undertook directly, and spending varied widely without relation to community need (Young et al., 2013).
A Missed Connection
A later study found that hospital spending on community health activities was unrelated to how much local public health agencies spent per capita in their communities, suggesting that hospitals and health departments were not coordinating their investments (Singh & Young, 2017). The authors pointed to opportunities for more active engagement so that public and private spending complement each other.
Partnership Models
Partnerships range from informal to highly integrated, as the table shows.
| Model | Description | Example activity |
|---|---|---|
| Information sharing | Exchange data and plans | Hospital shares emergency department data with health department |
| Joint assessment | Conduct one community health needs assessment together | Shared survey, focus groups and report |
| Aligned implementation | Divide priorities and coordinate strategies | Hospital funds diabetes program; health department leads tobacco policy |
| Shared investment | Pool funds for jointly chosen priorities | Community health fund governed by a joint board |
| Integrated services | Combined programs or staff | Community health workers employed jointly |
Benefits for Each Partner
Hospitals gain from health departments' epidemiological expertise, community relationships and population perspective. Health departments gain funding, clinical data and reach into patient populations. Communities gain from a single assessment rather than competing surveys and from coordinated strategies.
Challenges
Partnerships face challenges: different missions and cultures, competition among hospitals in the same area, concerns about data privacy, unequal power when one partner brings most of the money and turnover of leaders who championed the partnership. Clear agreements, shared governance and early wins help overcome them. Starting with a small, jointly funded project lets partners learn to work together before committing larger sums.
A Composite County Partnership
In a composite county with two nonprofit hospital systems and one health department, the three organizations agreed to conduct a single community health needs assessment every three years. The joint assessment identified behavioral health, housing instability and diabetes as priorities. They created a community health fund with contributions from both hospitals equal to a set share of their community benefit budgets, governed by a board including residents, with the health department as fiscal agent and data lead.
Results After Two Years
The fund supported community health workers in two neighborhoods whose residents often relied on the emergency room, a medical respite program for people leaving the hospital without housing and a diabetes prevention program at community sites. Emergency visits among people served by community health workers fell, and the partnership produced a joint annual report showing spending and results. The partners also agreed to report results by neighborhood so that the fund's reach could be judged fairly.
Other Private Partners
Beyond hospitals, health departments partner with employers on workplace wellness and vaccination, with insurers on quality measures, with pharmacies on immunization and naloxone, and with businesses on healthy food access. Each partnership requires attention to conflicts of interest, particularly when companies sell products that affect health. Written agreements with each partner set out roles, data use and how the partnership can be ended if goals diverge.
Governance of Shared Funds
Shared funds need clear governance: who sits on the board, how priorities are chosen, how grants are awarded and how results are reported. Including residents on the board and publishing decisions guard against the fund becoming a tool for any one partner's interests.
Data Sharing Agreements
Partnerships depend on data. Agreements should specify what data will be shared, for what purposes, how privacy will be protected and who owns the results. Aggregate and de-identified data are usually enough for community planning, which reduces privacy concerns.
Measuring Partnership Success
Partners should agree on measures of success, such as shared priorities addressed, dollars invested in community health improvement, outcomes for people served and partner satisfaction. Evaluating the partnership itself, not only its programs, helps it improve and survive leadership changes.
Conflicts of Interest
Partnerships with private organizations require attention to conflicts of interest. A hospital may prefer programs that reduce its costs or attract patients, while public health priorities may differ. Transparent criteria for choosing priorities, based on the joint assessment, help keep the partnership focused on community needs.
Sustaining Partnerships
Partnerships often depend on individual champions. Formal agreements, regular joint meetings and shared staff roles help partnerships survive leadership changes. The composite partners signed a five-year memorandum of understanding and review it annually.
Lessons for Administrators
Administrators entering partnerships should start with shared data and a joint assessment, agree early on priorities and governance, secure formal commitments of money and staff, and report results publicly. Small early successes, such as a jointly funded pilot, build trust for larger commitments. Above all, partnerships need someone whose job includes keeping them running.
Conclusion
Nonprofit hospitals' community benefit obligations create a strong basis for partnership with health departments, yet evidence shows that hospital community health spending has been small and uncoordinated with public health. Joint assessments, aligned strategies and shared investment funds, like the composite county's, can direct combined resources toward community priorities. Managing these alliances well is a core administrative skill.
References
Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 501(r) (2010).
Singh, S. R., & Young, G. J. (2017). Tax-exempt hospitals' investments in community health and local public health spending: Patterns and relationships. Health Services Research, 52(S2), 2378-2396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12739
Young, G. J., Chou, C.-H., Alexander, J., Lee, S.-Y. D., & Raver, E. (2013). Provision of community benefits by tax-exempt U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(16), 1519-1527. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1210239
What the MPH 540 Module 6 instructions ask for
MPH 540's catalog description closes with relationships between public and private health alliances, and because the sixth module's prompt is kept in the classroom, this example focuses on partnerships with nonprofit hospitals. Partnership assignments usually ask you to describe a partnership model, analyze benefits and challenges and propose or evaluate a collaboration. Check whether your instructor wants a real partnership from your area. Hospitals post their needs assessments online, which makes local examples easy to find. Explain the legal basis for hospital community benefit. Use evidence on spending. Describe governance. Address conflicts of interest. Consider who governs any shared money and how decisions are made. Note what each partner would report to the others.
Inside the MPH 540 Module 6 example
At the heart of this roughly 1,000-word paper is a three-column table of partnership models, with fifteen headings in all. The paper explains the community benefit obligation, how hospitals spend it and the missed connection with public health, then presents the models. Benefits, challenges, a composite partnership, results and other private partners follow, along with governance of shared funds, data sharing, measuring success, conflicts of interest, sustainability and lessons for administrators. The margin comment beside the obligation section notes that citing the statute shows the legal basis. The conclusion argues that aligned resources achieve more than separate efforts. Results after two years are reported so the reader can judge whether the partnership worked. The five models are ordered from least to most integrated.
MPH 540 Module 6 rubric: what earns full marks
For partnership papers, instructors check that legal obligations are stated correctly, use of evidence, clear partnership models, realistic treatment of challenges and practical recommendations. This paper cites the federal tax provision and two national studies of hospital community benefit in APA format. The models table shows a range of options. The composite partnership includes governance and measured results. Conflicts of interest are addressed directly. Instructors reward papers that show how partnerships are managed, not only formed. Clear governance, data agreements and measures of success show that the partnership is managed, not merely announced. Including residents in governance adds credibility. Specific spending figures from national studies anchor the argument.
MPH 540 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often describe partnerships as simply good without examining power, money or conflicts. Others skip the legal basis for hospital obligations. Name the statute and what it requires. Use data on how hospitals spend community benefit. Describe governance and data agreements. If you want to analyze a local hospital, a tutor can show you how to find its needs assessment and tax filings. End with the first step you would take to start a partnership. Describe what each partner contributes and gains. Include a way for partners to resolve disagreements. Note how you would keep the partnership going if a champion leaves. Mention any state rules on hospital community benefit reporting.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MPH 540 and Master of Public Health sample papers
- MPH 540 Module 1: Public Health Structure in the US
- MPH 540 Module 2: Accountability and Accreditation
- MPH 540 Module 3: Managing Financial Resources
- MPH 540 Module 4: Workforce and Human Resources
- MPH 540 Module 5: Prevention and the Impact Pyramid
- MPH 540 Module 7: Performance Management and QI
- MPH 540 Module 8: Health Department Strategic Plan
- MPH 550 Module 8: Evaluating the Initiative
- MPH 520 Module 2: Hazard Vulnerability Analysis
- MPH 570 Module 4: Public Health Data Sources
- MPH 501 Module 3: Financing Public Health
MPH 540 Module 6 questions, answered
What does MPH 540 Module 6 usually ask for?
Aspen's MPH 540 reviews relationships between public and private health alliances, so a paper on public-private partnerships is a typical assignment. Check your classroom prompt.
What must tax-exempt hospitals do under federal law?
Among other requirements, conduct a community health needs assessment at least every three years and adopt an implementation strategy.
What is a shared investment fund?
A pool of money contributed by several partners and governed jointly to fund agreed community health priorities.
Where can I find a free MPH 540 Module 6 sample paper?
This page carries the public-private partnership paper, with its table of five partnership models.
Why partner with nonprofit hospitals in MPH 540 Module 6?
Their tax exemption requires community benefit and needs assessments, and aligning their spending with public health priorities multiplies resources for community health.