DNP 852B Module 1 A Dissemination Plan by Audience Example

Reviewed by Maren Hollowell, MSN, RN Aspen University Updated September 2026

This DNP 852B Module 1 sample paper plans how a finished DNP project's results travel to the people able to act on them, starting from the decisions each audience faces. It opens Project Dissemination, the last course of the Aspen University Doctor of Nursing Practice project sequence. The project, which brought nurse-led asthma visits to a community health center's children, has six audiences, from clinic staff and health system leaders to families, school nurses, the nursing profession and policy makers. A table gives each one a message, a channel, a time and a measure of reach. Products are released in a deliberate order, a poster comes before the article, journals are chosen with care after evidence on predatory nursing publishers, and every product follows the same rules about claims. Aspen DNP students get a plan built around action rather than output.

CourseDNP 852B Project Dissemination
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeDissemination plan
LengthAbout 1,003 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramDNP
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 852B Module 1

1

Who Needs to Know, and What Will They Do With It? A Dissemination Plan for a Pediatric Asthma DNP Project

Student Name

Doctor of Nursing Practice Program, Aspen University

DNP 852B: Project Dissemination

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title frames dissemination as a question about audiences and their decisions, which is the organizing idea of the plan. APA 7 student title page.
2

Who Needs to Know, and What Will They Do With It? A Dissemination Plan for a Pediatric Asthma DNP Project

A project that improves care at one clinic has done half its work; the other half is getting its lessons to the people who could use them, in a shape they can use. This paper sets out the dissemination plan for my DNP project on children's asthma care at a community health center, whose 12-week results showed more children in control and fewer acute visits. It identifies six audiences, the decision each faces and the product that fits it, sets the order in which products will be released, lists what no product may claim and explains how reach will be tracked. The plan was agreed with the site.

Starting From Decisions

Brownson et al. (2018) argue that dissemination should be planned around four elements, the message, its source, the audience and the channel, and that briefs, personal meetings, workshops and news coverage reach practitioners and policy makers better than journal articles alone. The plan applies that advice by starting with what each audience must decide. Clinic staff decide whether to keep doing the work; leaders decide whether to fund and spread it; families decide whether to use the plan at home; school nurses decide whether to act on it at school; other nurses decide whether to try something similar; and policy makers decide whether rules on school plans and payment should change. Each product is built to inform one of those decisions.

The Plan by Audience

The table sets out each audience with its decision, message, channel, timing and a simple measure of reach.

AudienceDecisionCore messageChannelTimingMeasure
Clinic staffKeep the visit and the technique checksYour work was followed by better control; checks keep itStaff meeting with the run chartWeek after the defenseAttendance; questions logged
Health system leadersFund and spread to the second clinicEncouraging results; spread with measurementOne-page summary and 15-minute meetingWithin one monthDecision recorded
FamiliesUse and update the planMore children did well with a plan and coached techniquePlain-language letter in English and Spanish; waiting-room posterWithin one monthLetters sent; plan updates requested
School nursesUse the plan at schoolPlans now arrive from the clinic; here is how to read the zonesShort presentation at the district nurse meetingNext scheduled meetingPlans received and questions
Nursing professionTry a similar programA nurse visit in two languages, with lessons on implementationConference poster, then a journal articlePoster within six months; article within a yearAcceptance; downloads
Policy makersConsider school plan and payment rulesQuestions raised by one clinic's experienceBrief through the health system's government relations officeAfter leaders approveMeeting held
What this page is doingThe table ties every product to an audience's decision and a measure, which turns dissemination from a list of outputs into a plan that can be checked.
3

The Order of Release

Products will be released in a deliberate order. Clinic staff hear the results first, because they did the work and because learning of it second-hand would be a poor reward. Leaders hear next, since their decision about spread shapes what later products can say. Families and school nurses follow, in plain language. Professional and policy products come last, after the committee has approved the final manuscript and the clinic has agreed to be described. This order also allows each product to be checked against the approved results, so that nothing released earlier contradicts what is published later.

Why a Poster Comes Before the Article

The conference poster is scheduled before the journal article for practical reasons. It can be prepared quickly from the approved manuscript, it reaches nurses who manage clinics rather than only researchers, and it allows direct conversation with people considering similar programs. In a survey of poster authors, most regarded posters as a good way to transfer knowledge and a valid form of academic publication, most agreed that imagery is what first draws a viewer's attention, and many felt a poster communicates best when its author is present to explain it (Rowe & Ilic, 2009). The poster session will also test which parts of the story colleagues ask about, which will shape the emphasis of the article.

Choosing a Journal Carefully

Publication is the product most likely to reach nurses beyond the region, and it carries a particular risk. A study of predatory open access nursing journals found 140 such journals from 75 publishers, many of them new, and authors who had chosen journals on the strength of unsolicited emails and could not withdraw manuscripts afterward (Oermann et al., 2016). The plan will therefore choose a journal from established nursing and quality improvement journals indexed in major databases, check its editorial board and peer review process, and ignore unsolicited invitations.

What No Product May Claim

Every product will follow the same rules on claims. None will say the program caused the improvement; all will say improvement followed the program. None will present the size of the effect as what another clinic should expect. None will name the clinic without its written permission, and none will include details that could identify a child or family. The plain-language products will state that the results come from one clinic over 12 weeks, in words families can understand.

Tracking Reach

A simple log will record each product, its date, its audience and its measure of reach. At six months, the log will be reviewed with the site mentor to see which products led to action, such as the health system's decision on spread or requests from school nurses for plan training. That review will shape how the clinic shares future improvement work.

Products that reach no one will be revised or dropped.

The log lives with the nurse lead.

Conclusion

The dissemination plan starts from the decisions of six audiences and gives each a product, a channel and a time. It releases results in an order that respects the people who did the work, protects the accuracy of every claim and tracks whether the products lead to action.

The first staff presentation is already on the calendar.

References

Brownson, R. C., Eyler, A. A., Harris, J. K., Moore, J. B., & Tabak, R. G. (2018). Getting the word out: New approaches for disseminating public health science. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 24(2), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000673

Oermann, M. H., Conklin, J. L., Nicoll, L. H., Chinn, P. L., Ashton, K. S., Edie, A. H., Amarasekara, S., & Budinger, S. C. (2016). Study of predatory open access nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(6), 624-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12248

Rowe, N., & Ilic, D. (2009). What impact do posters have on academic knowledge transfer? A pilot survey on author attitudes and experiences. BMC Medical Education, 9, Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-9-71

DNP 852B Module 1 instructions, in plain terms

Dissemination is the whole subject of DNP 852B. Aspen's catalog describes the course as the dissemination phase, ending in a presentation and defense and opening the way to posters, podium talks or journal articles; the module wording is available only in the classroom, so that description shaped this example. A first assignment usually asks you to identify audiences, choose products and channels for each, and set a timeline. Your chair may want the plan tied to a dissemination framework or to specific conferences and journals. Some programs require evidence that the site agrees with what will be shared. Confirm the length and source rules, and ask your site early how it wishes to be described in public products.

How this DNP 852B Module 1 example is built

The paper runs about 1,000 words under nine headings. The introduction argues that dissemination is half of a project's work. Starting from decisions applies a published framework built on message, source, audience and channel. The plan by audience is a six-row table with message, channel, timing and measure. The order of release explains who hears first and why. A section explains why a poster precedes the article, citing a survey of poster authors. Choosing a journal carefully summarizes evidence on predatory nursing journals and sets rules. What no product may claim fixes limits on causal language, effect size and identification. Tracking reach describes a log and a six-month review, and the conclusion restates the plan.

Reading the DNP 852B Module 1 grading rubric

Dissemination plans are generally judged on audience analysis, fit between product and audience, and integrity. Audience analysis earns marks here because each audience is defined by the decision it faces; as the margin notes show, that makes the plan something a reviewer can check. Fit is shown in the table, where plain-language letters go to families and a brief goes to policy makers. Integrity appears in the rules on claims and in the careful approach to journals, supported by published evidence. The release order shows respect for the staff who did the work, a point graders in leadership courses tend to credit. Formatting points depend on the table and on three accurate citations.

DNP 852B Module 1 help: mistakes that cost marks

A frequent weakness is a plan that lists only a poster and an article, as if other nurses were the only audience. Include the people who will act on the findings locally. Students also forget families, who took part and deserve to hear results in plain language. Another common error is releasing results before the committee approves them, which can leave public products out of step with the final manuscript. Set an order. Papers often choose journals by convenience or respond to invitations that turn out to be predatory. Check indexing and editorial boards. Finally, define how you will know a product reached its audience, even if the measure is simple, so the plan can be reviewed.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 852B and DNP sample papers

DNP 852B Module 1 questions, answered

What does DNP 852B Module 1 usually ask for?

Aspen's DNP 852B description covers the dissemination phase, including presentations, posters and possible publication, so a dissemination plan matched to audiences is a typical first assignment. Check your classroom for the prompt.

Who should a DNP dissemination plan reach?

Everyone whose decisions the findings could inform: staff at the site, leaders, patients or families, partners such as school nurses, the wider profession and, where relevant, policy makers.

How do I avoid predatory journals?

Choose established journals indexed in major databases, check the editorial board and peer review process, and do not respond to unsolicited invitations that promise rapid publication for a fee.

Where can I find a free DNP 852B Module 1 sample paper?

The complete dissemination plan, audience table and margin notes included, is reproduced on this page without charge. It begins the DNP 852B series, the final stage of the pediatric asthma project followed through the earlier DNP 851A, 851B and 852A samples.

What should DNP 852B Module 1 include?

The audiences who can use your findings, the decision each faces, a product and channel for each, a timeline and release order, rules on what may be claimed and a simple way to track whether each product reached its audience.