DNP 852B Module 7 A Portfolio Linking the Project to Competencies Example

Reviewed by Maren Hollowell, MSN, RN Aspen University Updated September 2026

This DNP 852B Module 7 sample paper links a finished DNP project to all ten competency domains in the national nursing education framework, with a piece of checkable evidence for each. It belongs to Project Dissemination in the Aspen University DNP program. A table matches every domain, from knowledge for nursing practice to leadership development, with an artifact from a pediatric asthma project, such as the bilingual plan template, the registry run chart or the review board determination. Three rules for choosing artifacts are explained. Quality and safety, systems-based practice and leadership development are then explored in depth, two thinner domains are named honestly with directions for growth, and a plan for keeping the portfolio after graduation closes the paper. Aspen DNP students see a portfolio built on evidence rather than assertion.

CourseDNP 852B Project Dissemination
ModuleModule 7
Paper typeCompetency portfolio
LengthAbout 1,020 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramDNP
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for DNP 852B Module 7

1

Evidence, Not Assertion: A Portfolio Linking a Pediatric Asthma DNP Project to the Ten Competency Domains

Student Name

Doctor of Nursing Practice Program, Aspen University

DNP 852B: Project Dissemination

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title states the standard the portfolio holds itself to, that each competency claim rests on a piece of evidence. APA 7 student title page.
2

Evidence, Not Assertion: A Portfolio Linking a Pediatric Asthma DNP Project to the Ten Competency Domains

A competency portfolio is easy to write badly: a list of domains, each followed by a sentence claiming that the project demonstrated it. A useful portfolio does something harder. It points, for each domain, to a specific product or decision that a reader can examine, and it admits where the evidence is thin. This paper presents such a portfolio for my DNP project, which brought nurse-led asthma visits to children at a community health center. It maps the project to the national framework's ten domains, discusses three domains in depth, identifies the weaker domains and explains how the portfolio will be maintained.

The Framework

The national professional association for nursing schools organizes the competencies expected of nursing graduates, including those in practice doctorate programs, into ten domains (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2021): (1) knowledge for nursing practice, (2) person-centered care, (3) population health, (4) scholarship for the nursing discipline, (5) quality and safety, (6) interprofessional partnerships, (7) systems-based practice, (8) informatics and healthcare technologies, (9) professionalism, and (10) personal, professional and leadership development. The portfolio uses those ten domains as its structure, so that the committee and future employers can read it against a shared standard.

The Portfolio

The table matches each domain to one piece of evidence from the project, chosen because a reader could look at it.

DomainEvidence from the project
Knowledge for nursing practiceChapter two synthesis linking action plan and technique evidence to the visit's design
Person-centered careBilingual plan template and teach-back standard, reviewed by two parents
Population healthRegistry analysis showing the clinic-wide gap and the run chart of coverage across 640 children
Scholarship for the nursing disciplineApproved manuscript, conference poster and article in preparation
Quality and safetyPlan template matched to prescribed medicines; routes back to clinicians; fidelity audits; balancing measures
Interprofessional partnershipsWork with clinicians, medical assistants, front-desk staff and school nurses, recorded in the log
Systems-based practiceA front-desk owner for school plans, plus a monthly registry flag, made part of routine operations
Informatics and healthcare technologiesRecord template, registry query and use of the regional health information exchange
ProfessionalismReview board determination, privacy safeguards and disclosure of the author's role
Personal, professional and leadership developmentReflection on leading change without line authority, and the sustainability handoff
What this page is doingEach domain points to a concrete artifact rather than a claim, which lets a reviewer verify the portfolio instead of taking it on trust.
3

How the Artifacts Were Chosen

For each domain, several artifacts were possible, and the choice followed three rules. The artifact had to exist outside the author's memory, as a document, dataset or decision on record. It had to show the author's own contribution, not only the team's. And it had to be something the author would be willing to show an employer or a licensing body. Those rules excluded some tempting items, such as a positive comment from a clinic leader, which shows goodwill but not competence. They also led to including some unglamorous artifacts, such as the data dictionary and the correction log, which show the care that the analysis depended on.

Quality and Safety in Depth

The project touches quality and safety in more ways than its outcomes. The visit did not change medicines directly; any change went through the child's clinician, and the plan template was built so that the zones matched the medicines prescribed. Balancing measures watched for harm, and an audit of plans found none recommending a medicine or dose not ordered. Fidelity was measured weekly and reported openly. The evidence in this domain is strong because it rests on documents and data rather than on the author's account.

Systems-Based Practice in Depth

The project's most lasting effect may be on the clinic's systems rather than on individual children. Giving the front desk ownership of school plans, adding a monthly registry flag and making technique checks part of rooming changed routines that will outlast the project. The run chart shows plan coverage rising across the registry, including among children who never enrolled, which is evidence that the system changed. In the terms used in implementation research, the program reached beyond adoption toward penetration and sustainability (Proctor et al., 2011).

Leadership Development in Depth

The project was led by a student with no authority over the nurses, assistants or front-desk staff who did the work. Leadership therefore meant persuading, organizing and listening: running huddles, sharing honest data, giving credit to the people who fixed problems and accepting a slower start when a nurse was not ready. The evidence here is partly the outcomes of that leadership, such as the clinic's decision to continue, and partly a written reflection. Reviews of reflection in health professions education describe it as widely valued for professional competence, though its evidence base remains largely theoretical (Mann et al., 2009), so the reflection is offered as a record of learning rather than proof of skill.

Where the Evidence Is Thinner

Two domains are weaker. Informatics evidence shows use of existing tools rather than design of new ones, and population health evidence covers one clinic's registry rather than a community. Stating these gaps is part of an honest portfolio, and each suggests a direction for future work: a role in the health system's informatics committee, and a partnership with the school district on asthma across schools.

Both are noted so that future employers see a realistic picture.

Keeping the Portfolio

The portfolio will be kept as a living document after graduation. Each artifact is stored with its date and location, and new evidence will be added as the article is published, the program spreads and new roles bring new work. A short annual review will ask which domains have grown and which need attention.

The first review falls a year after the defense.

Conclusion

The portfolio links each of the ten competency domains to a piece of evidence from the project that a reader can check, explores three domains in depth and names two that are thinner. It is meant to show not only what the project achieved but what its author learned and still needs to develop.

It goes to the committee with the final manuscript.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2021). The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education.

Mann, K., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2009). Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(4), 595-621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7

DNP 852B Module 7 instructions, in plain terms

Module 7 connects the project to the competencies a practice doctorate is meant to build. Aspen's catalog places DNP 852B at the end of the project, when final approval is sought, and a portfolio of competencies is a common part of that stage; the prompt stays in the classroom, so the example rests on that context. A portfolio assignment usually asks you to map your project and coursework to a named competency framework, provide evidence for each competency and reflect on growth. Your program may use the 2021 competency domains or an earlier set of doctoral essentials, so confirm which applies. Check the length and format rules, and gather artifacts as you go rather than at the end.

Inside the DNP 852B Module 7 example

Roughly 1,000 words fill nine sections. It opens by contrasting a list of claims with a portfolio of evidence. The framework section names the ten domains. A table pairs each domain with one artifact. How the artifacts were chosen explains three rules and the items they excluded. Quality and safety in depth describes the safeguards and audits. Systems-based practice in depth explains how routines changed, using implementation outcomes. Leadership development in depth describes leading without authority and the place of reflection. Where the evidence is thinner names two domains and next steps. Keeping the portfolio sets an annual review, and the conclusion restates what the portfolio shows.

Where the marks sit in the DNP 852B Module 7 rubric

Faculty grade a competency portfolio on completeness, evidence and self-assessment. Completeness shows in all ten domains being addressed. Evidence is the portfolio's strength, since each domain points to an artifact a reviewer can open and check, as the margin notes stress. Self-assessment appears in naming two weaker domains, with next steps for each, and in describing reflection as a record of learning rather than proof of skill. The in-depth sections show analysis of how the project built specific competencies. Explaining how artifacts were chosen shows judgment. Remaining marks turn on an APA-styled table and correct references for the framework, the implementation outcomes paper and the reflection review.

DNP 852B Module 7 help from the desk

The most common mistake is claiming every competency with a sentence and no evidence. Point to an artifact for each. Students also choose artifacts that show the team's work rather than their own; pick items that show your contribution. Another frequent gap is honesty about weaker domains, which makes a portfolio look inflated. Name them and say how you will grow. Some portfolios use an outdated framework without checking what the program requires. Confirm the version. Finally, keep the portfolio after graduation. It is useful for job applications and credentialing, and a document that is updated each year is far more valuable than one written once for a course.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More DNP 852B and DNP sample papers

DNP 852B Module 7 questions, answered

What does DNP 852B Module 7 usually ask for?

Aspen's DNP 852B description covers dissemination and final approval, and a portfolio linking the project to doctoral competencies is a typical assignment in that phase. Check your classroom for the prompt and the framework your program uses.

Which competencies should a DNP portfolio use?

Use the framework your program names. Many now use the ten domains of the 2021 national competency framework for nursing education; some still use the older doctoral essentials.

How do I show a competency in a DNP portfolio?

Point to a specific artifact a reader can examine, such as a protocol, a data analysis, a poster or a policy change, and explain briefly how it shows the competency. Avoid bare claims.

Where can I find a free DNP 852B Module 7 sample paper?

This page reproduces the entire competency portfolio, domain table and annotations included, at no cost. It is the seventh DNP 852B sample for the pediatric asthma project and precedes the reflection written after the defense.

Which competencies belong in a DNP 852B Module 7 portfolio?

Those in the framework your program uses, often the ten domains of the 2021 national competency framework for nursing education. Link each to a specific artifact from your project.