| Course | HCA 120 Healthcare Information Systems |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | EHR analysis paper |
| Length | About 1,067 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Health Care Administration |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HCA 120 Module 3
More Than a Chart: The Electronic Health Record Seen From the Administrator's Desk
Student Name
Health Care Administration Program, Aspen University
HCA 120: Healthcare Information Systems
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
More Than a Chart: The Electronic Health Record Seen From the Administrator's Desk
The electronic health record is usually described as a clinical tool, the place where providers write notes and order tests. For administrators, it is also a workflow system that routes tasks, a source of billing data, a legal record and a major cost. Seen from the manager's office of a composite family practice staffed by six clinicians, this paper examines who uses the record and for what, the workload it creates and the changes administrators can make. Hospitals adopted certified records far faster once federal incentive payments began (Adler-Milstein & Jha, 2017), and office practices followed, so nearly every administrator now inherits one.
What the Record Holds
The record holds each patient's problem list, medications, allergies, visit notes, orders, results, immunizations, scanned documents and messages. It also holds data administrators rely on: the diagnosis and procedure codes that feed claims, the time stamps that show when tasks were done and the audit trail that records who opened each chart. The practice treats the record as its legal medical record, so what is written there must be complete, accurate and protected.
Who Uses It
Nearly everyone in the practice uses the record, but for different tasks. The table shows the main users.
| User | Main record tasks |
|---|---|
| Physicians and nurse practitioners | Notes, orders, prescriptions, results review, messages |
| Medical assistants | Vital signs, medication lists, screening questions, inbox triage |
| Front desk | Scanning documents, updating demographics, forms |
| Referral coordinator | Referral orders, outside records, prior authorizations |
| Billing staff | Reviewing codes and documentation for claims |
| Office manager | Reports, access control, audit review |
Connections to Other Systems
The record is connected to the practice management system, which sends appointments and receives charges; to laboratories, which send results; to pharmacies, which receive prescriptions; and to the regional health information exchange, which shares records with hospitals. Each connection saves manual work when it runs and creates a new failure point when it does not. The office manager keeps a list of interfaces and whom to call when one stops.
The Documentation Burden
The record has shifted a large amount of clerical work onto providers. Event logs from 142 Wisconsin family physicians, checked against direct observation, put their record use at 355 minutes a weekday, more than half of a workday that averaged 11.4 hours, and 86 of those minutes came after clinic closed; notes, orders, billing, coding and other clerical work filled 44.2% of the record time, and the inbox another 23.7% (Arndt et al., 2017). For administrators, this burden matters because it contributes to burnout and turnover, which are costly to a small practice.
Time With Patients
The same pattern appears in direct observation. Observers who followed ambulatory physicians in four specialties found that even inside the exam room, 37.0% of physician time went on the record and desk work and 52.9% facing the patient (Sinsky et al., 2016). Patients notice when a provider looks at the screen more than at them. Room layout, such as placing the screen so the patient can see it too, is one inexpensive change administrators can make.
Delegating Inbox Work
The inbox is where results, refill requests, patient messages and forms arrive. In the composite practice, every item went first to the physician, who then sent many to staff. The office manager worked with physicians to route routine refills for stable chronic medications to medical assistants under a written protocol, normal results to nurses for patient notification, and forms to the front desk for completion before physician signature. Physicians saw fewer items and signed off faster.
Templates and Their Limits
Templates speed documentation but can also produce long notes full of copied text that hides what happened at the visit. The practice reviewed its templates with the physicians, removed unused sections and set default text to blank rather than normal findings. Billing staff also benefit, since notes that clearly state the problems addressed and decisions made support accurate coding.
Release of Information
Requests for records come from patients, other providers, insurers, attorneys and government agencies. The front desk processes them through the record's release-of-information function, which tracks the request, the authorization and what was sent. Patients have a right to access their own records, and many now view notes and results through the portal. Staff must verify each requester's identity and authority before release.
Access and Audit
The record contains everything about a patient, so access must be limited by role. The office manager assigns each user a role with only the functions needed, removes access on the day someone leaves and reviews the audit log for unusual patterns, such as staff opening records of coworkers or family members. These controls protect patients and the practice.
What Administrators Can Change
Administrators cannot redesign the vendor's software, but they control much of how it is used: who does which tasks, which alerts are turned on, how templates are built, how staff are trained and how interfaces are monitored. The composite practice set up a monthly meeting of a physician, a medical assistant, a front desk lead and the office manager to review record problems and agree on changes. Small changes made regularly added up.
Measuring Burden Locally
Most record systems can produce event-log reports for each provider, showing time in notes, time in the inbox and time after hours. The office manager reviews these reports each quarter with the physicians, not to rank them but to find where delegation or template changes could help. When one physician's after-hours time fell by about half an hour a day after inbox delegation, the others asked for the same change.
Training New Users
New employees receive record training by role before their first day with patients, covering only the screens they will use, followed by a week with an experienced colleague. When the vendor releases an update, the office manager circulates a one-page summary of changes that affect daily work. Short, role-specific training reduces the workarounds that appear when staff are left to figure out the system alone.
Conclusion
From the administrator's desk, the electronic health record is a shared workspace, a data source for billing and a legal record. It has brought safety and access, but it has also moved clerical work onto providers, taking hours of their day. Administrators can reduce that burden by delegating inbox work, simplifying templates, arranging rooms and running a regular forum for record problems.
References
Adler-Milstein, J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Affairs, 36(8), 1416-1422. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017). Tethered to the EHR: Primary care physician workload assessment using EHR event log data and time-motion observations. Annals of Family Medicine, 15(5), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2121
Sinsky, C., Colligan, L., Li, L., Prgomet, M., Reynolds, S., Goeders, L., Westbrook, J., Tutty, M., & Blike, G. (2016). Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: A time and motion study in 4 specialties. Annals of Internal Medicine, 165(11), 753-760. https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-0961
Reading the HCA 120 Module 3 assignment instructions
The HCA 120 description refers to technology's effect on traditional techniques and practices, and with the module's exact wording available only to enrolled students, an administrative look at the record fits that emphasis. Assignments on the record usually ask you to describe its functions, discuss benefits and problems and recommend improvements. Some specify a viewpoint, such as a manager's or a patient's. Read your prompt to see whether it expects clinical detail or administrative focus. If you use your own workplace, describe processes rather than people. Choose measured evidence, such as time studies, when you discuss burden, because opinions about records are easy to find and hard to grade. Keep the administrative viewpoint throughout, even when citing clinical studies.
How this HCA 120 Module 3 example is built
At about 1,040 words, the paper uses fifteen headings and a table of record users. It opens with what the record holds, including billing data and audit trails, then lists users and their tasks. A section describes interfaces with scheduling, laboratories, pharmacies and exchange. Two evidence sections measure the documentation burden and exam room time. The practical sections follow: inbox delegation under protocols, template cleanup, release of information, access and audit, local burden reports and role-based training. The paper closes with what administrators can control and a monthly problem-solving meeting. Margin notes point out the value of event-log hours to a manager. Each practical section ends with a change the office manager can make. The paper keeps a manager's view from start to finish.
Where the marks sit in the HCA 120 Module 3 rubric
Record analysis papers are usually judged on accurate explanation of the system, balanced treatment of benefits and burdens, practical recommendations and sources. Explanation here covers contents, users and connections. Balance comes from pairing the record's safety and access benefits with measured hours of clerical work. Recommendations are things an administrator can actually do: delegate, simplify templates, rearrange rooms, review audit logs and hold a regular forum. Two time studies and a national adoption study supply the evidence, listed in APA style. A paper that only praises or only blames the record will score lower than one that weighs both. Clear links between each problem and its fix also matter to graders.
HCA 120 Module 3 help: mistakes that cost marks
Students often write about the record as though it were only a clinical charting tool. Show its administrative roles too: billing data, legal record, access control. Another common problem is discussing burnout without numbers; time studies give you figures to work with. Some papers recommend replacing the system, which is rarely realistic; focus on how it is used. Remember release of information and audit logs, which are central to administration. If you want feedback on whether your analysis is balanced and your recommendations are practical, our tutors can go through your draft and point out gaps before it is due. Keep patient and staff names out of any workplace example.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HCA 120 and Health Care Administration sample papers
- HCA 120 Module 1: From Paper Charts to Electronic Systems
- HCA 120 Module 2: The Practice Management System
- HCA 120 Module 4: Telehealth and Support Staff
- HCA 120 Module 5: Patient Portals and Online Messaging
- HCA 120 Module 6: Downtime and Data Errors
- HCA 120 Module 7: Security and Privacy in Daily Use
- HCA 120 Module 8: Ambient AI Scribes and Health Care Work
- HCA 100 Module 3: Teamwork Between Front and Back Office
- HCA 320 Module 1: Health Care Market Economics
- HCA 305 Module 5: Practice Finances and Daily Reconciliation
- HCA 205 Module 2: Common Cardiovascular Diseases
HCA 120 Module 3 questions, answered
What does HCA 120 Module 3 usually ask for?
The HCA 120 description covers how technology changed practice in health care, so a paper on the electronic health record is a typical assignment. Check your Aspen classroom for the prompt.
How much time do physicians spend in the EHR?
Wisconsin event-log data showed family physicians in the record about 355 minutes each weekday, 86 of them after clinic hours.
What is an EHR audit log?
A record of who opened, changed or printed each patient chart and when, used to detect inappropriate access.
Where can I find a free HCA 120 Module 3 sample paper?
This page. The whole administrative EHR paper, with its user table and margin notes, appears above and is open to all readers. It is the third sample for HCA 120.
What can administrators change about the EHR in HCA 120 Module 3?
Task routing, template design, alerts, training, access roles and interface monitoring, even though the software itself belongs to the vendor.