| Course | MGT 500 Management |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 8 |
| Paper type | MBA integrated management plan |
| Length | About 1,040 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Master of Business Administration |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for MGT 500 Module 8
Back to the Office and Out the Door: An Integrated Management Plan for Hybrid Work at a Payroll Services Company
Student Name
Master of Business Administration, Aspen University
MGT 500: Management
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Back to the Office and Out the Door: An Integrated Management Plan for Hybrid Work at a Payroll Services Company
Chattahoochee Payroll Partners, a composite company in Columbus, Georgia, processes payroll, tax filings and benefits administration for about 2,400 small and midsize businesses. It employs 320 people, including 40 client managers who are each responsible for about 60 client accounts. During the pandemic, most employees worked from home, and client satisfaction stayed high. Last January, a new chief operating officer ordered everyone back to the office five days a week, citing collaboration and culture. Within six months, nine client managers resigned, most to remote jobs at competitors, taking client relationships and knowledge with them. Client complaints about response times rose 30%. The chief executive has asked for a management plan for how and where people should work.
What the Evidence Shows
Bloom et al. (2015) randomly assigned volunteers from the call center of a big travel firm in China to work at home four days a week. Home workers' performance rose by 13%, mostly from working more minutes per shift and taking fewer breaks and sick days, and their attrition fell by half. However, home workers were promoted at a lower rate, a cost the authors noted. Choudhury et al. (2021) followed federal patent examiners who were permitted to live and work wherever they chose and found a 4.4% increase in output, without a decline in quality. Gajendran and Harrison (2007) combined studies of telecommuting and found small favorable effects on perceived autonomy, job satisfaction, performance and intention to stay, with no harm to supervisor relationships; but high-intensity telecommuting, more than two and a half days a week, harmed relationships with coworkers.
A Plan Organized by Function
| Function | Element of the plan |
|---|---|
| Planning | Goal: retain client managers and restore response times; hybrid arrangement piloted for six months, then reviewed |
| Decision making | Teams choose anchor days with their managers within company rules; exceptions decided by a written process |
| Organizing | Client teams of five managers each with a shared anchor day in the office; desks shared on other days |
| Leading | Managers trained to run hybrid meetings, hold weekly one-on-ones and rotate high-visibility assignments fairly |
| Controlling | Measures of client response time, retention and promotion rates compared by arrangement |
Why the Office Order Backfired
The return-to-office order was a single decision that touched every function without planning for any of them. It set no goal beyond attendance, was decided without asking client managers how their work had changed, ignored how teams were organized, gave managers no guidance on leading a mixed workforce and measured badge swipes rather than client service. Client managers, whose work is mostly phone and email with clients spread across three states, saw no benefit from commuting and could find remote jobs easily. The departures were predictable.
Planning
The plan's goal is to restore client response times to under four business hours and reduce client manager turnover below 10% a year, while building the collaboration the chief operating officer rightly values. Arrangements will be piloted for six months with two client teams before company-wide adoption.
Decision Making
Rather than one rule set at the top, teams will choose their anchor day with their manager, within limits: at least one shared day a week and coverage of the office phone line every day. Requests for fully remote work will be decided by a written process based on role and performance, so decisions are consistent.
Organizing
Client managers will be grouped into teams of five with a shared anchor day, so that time in the office is spent with the people they actually work with. New hires will spend their first eight weeks mainly in the office, learning from experienced colleagues.
Leading
Managers will be trained to run meetings where in-person and remote participants have equal voice, hold weekly one-on-ones and rotate high-visibility client assignments so that remote workers are not overlooked for promotion.
Controlling
The company will measure results, not presence: client response time, satisfaction and retention by team, plus promotion rates by work arrangement.
How the Parts Fit
The plan uses each function to address a risk the research identified. Anchor days with the same team, an organizing choice, protect the coworker relationships Gajendran and Harrison found can weaken under heavy remote work. Fair rotation of visible assignments, a leading practice, addresses the promotion gap Bloom and colleagues observed. And comparing promotion rates by arrangement, a control, checks whether the gap persists.
Costs and Savings
Training managers to lead hybrid teams will cost about $25,000, and shared desks will let the company give up one floor of leased space, saving about $90,000 a year. Each departing client manager cost about $35,000 in recruiting, training and lost client revenue; the nine departures cost more than $300,000. Keeping even half of the next year's expected departures would repay the plan many times over.
Addressing the Chief Operating Officer's Concern
The chief operating officer's worry about collaboration is supported by Gajendran and Harrison's finding that heavy remote work can weaken coworker relationships. The plan does not dismiss that concern; it addresses it with team anchor days and office-based onboarding, where research suggests in-person time matters most, rather than requiring everyone to be present every day.
Communicating the Change
The chief executive will announce the plan in person at an all-company meeting, acknowledging that the five-day order did not work as intended and explaining the evidence behind the new approach. Former client managers who left in good standing will be invited to return under the new arrangement. Each team will meet within two weeks to choose its anchor day.
Measures
The company will track client manager turnover, client response times, client satisfaction, promotion rates by work arrangement and a quarterly survey on collaboration. The chief executive will review results after six months and adjust anchor days or eligibility if service or collaboration suffers.
Conclusion
Chattahoochee's return-to-office order addressed a real concern, collaboration, with a tool that research suggests carries heavy costs. Experimental and meta-analytic evidence supports hybrid work that keeps most of remote work's gains while protecting relationships and fairness. Organizing the plan by the five management functions turns a single policy into a managed system with measures and a date to learn from them.
References
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655-683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Reading the MGT 500 Module 8 assignment instructions
Module 8 closes Aspen's MBA management course by asking students to bring planning, decision making, organizing, leading and controlling together on one current issue. A typical submission chooses a live problem, reviews evidence and builds a management plan that uses every function. Follow your classroom's instructions for the final module; this example addresses hybrid work at one company. Describe the issue and why it matters now. Review research, preferring strong evidence such as experiments and meta-analyses. Build a plan that addresses each management function. Show how the parts fit together. Set measures and a review date, and explain what would cause the plan to change. Explain why any earlier approach failed.
How this MGT 500 Module 8 example is built
The paper opens with Chattahoochee Payroll Partners, which processes payroll and tax filings for about 2,400 small businesses. A five-day office order last January was followed by nine departures among 40 client managers, and client complaints rose. Bloom, Liang, Roberts and Ying's Quarterly Journal of Economics experiment at a Chinese travel agency found a 13% performance increase and halved attrition among home workers, though promotion rates fell. Choudhury, Foroughi and Larson's Strategic Management Journal study found a 4.4% output gain when examiners could work from anywhere. Gajendran and Harrison's Journal of Applied Psychology meta-analysis found modest gains in autonomy, satisfaction and performance, with high-intensity remote work harming coworker relationships. A table sets out the plan by function, from a team-based anchor day to measures of client response time. Measures include client manager retention and promotion rates by work arrangement.
MGT 500 Module 8 rubric: what earns full marks
Integrated plans are judged on the strength of the evidence used, the coverage of all management functions and the coherence of the parts. This example relies on experiments and a meta-analysis rather than opinion surveys. Each management function contributes a specific element, and the plan addresses a risk the evidence identifies: fewer promotions and weaker ties for remote workers. The table makes the integration visible, and a section on each function shows how the plan would work in practice. Measures cover retention, service and fairness, the review date keeps the plan open to evidence and the plan takes the chief operating officer's concern about collaboration seriously.
MGT 500 Module 8 help: mistakes that cost marks
Final management papers often discuss a current issue without applying the management functions systematically. Build the plan around planning, decision making, organizing, leading and controlling. Another weakness is relying on surveys of preferences rather than evidence of effects; use experiments and meta-analyses where possible. Address the downsides research identifies, such as weaker relationships or slower promotion. Show how the parts of the plan support each other. Set measures and a review date. Finally, keep the plan specific to the organization's work and people. Treat the concerns behind the earlier decision as real.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More MGT 500 and Master of Business Administration sample papers
- MGT 500 Module 1: Managers and Management Practices
- MGT 500 Module 2: Planning and Goal Setting
- MGT 500 Module 3: Managerial Decision Making
- MGT 500 Module 4: Organizing and Coordination
- MGT 500 Module 5: Managing People and Teams
- MGT 500 Module 6: Leading and Motivating Employees
- MGT 500 Module 7: Controlling and Performance Measurement
- MGT 514 Module 8: Career Advancement and a Development Plan
- MGT 530 Module 2: Traits, Skills and Behaviors
- MGT 646 Module 4: Sequencing and Schedule
- MGT 570 Module 7: Aligning the Organization With a Balanced Scorecard
MGT 500 Module 8 questions, answered
What does MGT 500 Module 8 usually ask for?
Aspen's MGT 500 closes with current issues and an integrated management plan, so an MBA paper applying all management functions to one current issue is typical. Check your classroom prompt.
Does working from home reduce productivity?
Bloom and colleagues' experiment found a 13% performance increase among home workers at a Chinese travel agency, and Choudhury and colleagues found output gains when examiners could work from anywhere.
What are the downsides of remote work?
Gajendran and Harrison found high-intensity telecommuting harmed coworker relationships, and Bloom and colleagues found lower promotion rates among home workers.
Where can I find a free MGT 500 Module 8 sample paper?
The example above builds an integrated management plan for hybrid work at a payroll services company, organized by the five management functions.
How should a company decide on hybrid work?
By looking at evidence on effects, testing arrangements with its own data and designing practices that protect collaboration and fairness in promotion.