| Course | DNP 820 Health Policy and Advocacy |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Policy process analysis |
| Length | About 1,063 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | DNP |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for DNP 820 Module 1
From Sixty Days to a Year: Kingdon's Multiple Streams and the Extension of Postpartum Medicaid Coverage
Student Name
Doctor of Nursing Practice Program, Aspen University
DNP 820: Health Policy and Advocacy
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
From Sixty Days to a Year: Kingdon's Multiple Streams and the Extension of Postpartum Medicaid Coverage
For decades, women who qualified for Medicaid because of pregnancy lost that coverage 60 days after giving birth. Within a few years, Congress first let states offer 12 months of postpartum coverage and then made that choice permanent. Why did a problem that had existed for years suddenly move? This paper uses Kingdon's multiple streams model of the policy process to explain the change, and it identifies where nurses and nursing organizations participated. It closes with what the case teaches doctoral nurses about influencing policy.
The Model
Kingdon (2011) described three largely independent currents in government. In the first, a condition that people have lived with becomes a recognized problem, usually because numbers change, a dramatic event draws attention, or an existing program reports that it is falling short. In the second, experts float solutions, and only those that can be carried out, fit prevailing values and cost an acceptable amount stay in circulation. In the third, public mood, interest group pressure and elections alter what officials are willing to do. Change becomes likely when all three line up at once, which Kingdon called an open window, and it usually takes a committed advocate, the policy entrepreneur, to couple a ready solution to the problem before the window closes.
The Problem Stream
Maternal mortality in the United States became increasingly visible as a problem during the 2010s. An analysis of national surveillance data found a pregnancy-related mortality ratio of 17.2 deaths per 100,000 live births for 2011 to 2015, and the ratio among Black women was 3.3 times, and among American Indian or Alaska Native women 2.5 times, the ratio among White women. Of deaths with known timing, 21.4% occurred 7 to 42 days after delivery and 11.7% between 43 and 365 days, and review committees in 13 states judged about 60% of deaths preventable (Petersen et al., 2019). Deaths after the 60-day cutoff fell precisely in the period when many women had lost coverage.
Research on insurance showed why. Using national survey data, one study found that more than half of women covered by Medicaid or CHIP when they gave birth, 55%, went without coverage at some point in the next six months (Daw et al., 2017). Another found that, after the Affordable Care Act, new mothers in a state that did not expand Medicaid lost coverage more often and used fewer outpatient services in the six months after birth than those in a state that did (Gordon et al., 2020). Indicators and research thus defined postpartum coverage loss as a problem connected to preventable deaths.
The Policy Stream
Several proposals competed. Some advocates favored broader Medicaid expansion, which would have covered many postpartum women through income eligibility, but expansion remained politically divisive. Extending pregnancy-related coverage from 60 days to 12 months was narrower, technically simple because it built on an existing eligibility category, consistent with widely shared values about mothers and infants, and modest in cost. Before federal action, several states had sought federal waivers to extend coverage, which showed feasibility and gave the proposal a track record.
The Politics Stream and the Window
The politics stream shifted in 2020 and 2021. The pandemic had already required states to keep Medicaid enrollees covered continuously during the public health emergency, which showed what longer postpartum coverage would look like in practice. National attention to racial disparities in health, including maternal deaths, was high. A change in party control of the federal government created an opportunity for a large relief bill. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 let states lengthen Medicaid coverage after childbirth to a full year starting in April 2022 for five years, and a year later the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 made the option permanent. The window opened when a defined problem, a ready proposal and favorable politics came together in must-pass legislation.
Where Nurses Entered
Nurses participated in each stream. In the problem stream, nurses served on maternal mortality review committees, whose findings on preventability and timing helped define the problem. Nurse researchers studied postpartum care and coverage. In the policy and politics streams, nursing organizations, particularly those representing women's health, obstetric and neonatal nurses and nurse-midwives, joined coalitions supporting extension and testified in state legislatures considering adoption. After the federal option passed, nurses in state agencies and health systems helped implement it, a stage the multiple streams model addresses less directly than the others.
Limits of the Model
The multiple streams model explains how the extension reached the agenda better than how it worked in practice. Because the federal law created an option rather than a mandate, each state then went through its own policy process, and adoption depended on state budgets, politics and advocacy. The model also says little about implementation: eligibility systems had to be reprogrammed, enrollees informed and clinicians made aware that postpartum patients now had coverage for a full year. And coverage alone does not guarantee care. Research on postpartum visits suggests that continuity of coverage is necessary but not sufficient, so the policy's effect on maternal deaths will depend on whether clinicians and health systems use the extra months to follow up on hypertension, diabetes, depression and substance use. A doctoral nurse analyzing the policy should therefore pair a process model with an implementation and outcomes lens.
Lessons for Doctoral Nurses
The case offers three lessons. First, data that connect a problem to preventable harm, such as the timing of maternal deaths, can move an issue from background to agenda. Second, a narrow, feasible proposal ready before a window opens is more likely to pass than a broad one waiting for ideal politics. Third, windows open briefly, often in large bills, so advocates must be prepared with language, cost estimates and coalitions in advance. Doctoral nurses can contribute to all three by generating and presenting data, helping draft proposals and building relationships with legislators before they are needed.
Conclusion
The extension of postpartum Medicaid coverage to 12 months illustrates Kingdon's model well: indicators and research defined the problem, a narrow and feasible proposal was ready, and shifting politics opened a window in major legislation. Nurses contributed data, expertise and advocacy in each stream. For doctoral nurses, the case shows that influencing policy depends as much on preparation and timing as on the strength of the evidence.
References
Daw, J. R., Hatfield, L. A., Swartz, K., & Sommers, B. D. (2017). Women in the United States experience high rates of coverage "churn" in months before and after childbirth. Health Affairs, 36(4), 598-606. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1241
Gordon, S. H., Sommers, B. D., Wilson, I. B., & Trivedi, A. N. (2020). Effects of Medicaid expansion on postpartum coverage and outpatient utilization. Health Affairs, 39(1), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00547
Kingdon, J. W. (2011). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (Updated 2nd ed.). Longman.
Petersen, E. E., Davis, N. L., Goodman, D., Cox, S., Mayes, N., Johnston, E., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Shapiro-Mendoza, C. K., Callaghan, W. M., & Barfield, W. (2019). Vital signs: Pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013-2017. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(18), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6818e1
Reading the DNP 820 Module 1 assignment instructions
DNP 820 module prompts are kept inside the Aspen classroom, so this example was pinned to the catalog description: critiquing the policy process and assessing how legislative and governmental action shapes health care delivery. An opening paper in this course will usually have you choose a policy process model, explain it, and apply it to a real policy or a policy problem. Some prompts name the model, while others let you pick among Kingdon, the stages heuristic or advocacy coalitions. Check whether your instructor wants a federal or a state policy, how recent it must be, and whether nursing's role must be addressed. The number of sources and the page range will be listed in the assignment details, and a policy paper usually needs government reports as well as journal articles.
How the DNP 820 Module 1 example is put together
The example runs about 1,060 words under eight headings. It opens with a paragraph on the model and its three streams. The problem stream section shows how data on maternal deaths and coverage gaps turned a condition into a recognized problem. The policy stream section follows the idea of extended coverage as it moved from proposals and waivers to a state option. A section on politics and the window explains the pandemic relief bill that opened the door and the later law that kept it open. Nurses' entry points get their own section, followed by the model's limits and lessons for doctoral nurses. Each section ends by linking back to the model, which keeps the paper analytic rather than historical. The conclusion ties the case to the model and to nursing.
Reading the DNP 820 Module 1 grading rubric
The rubric in your classroom will likely give most weight to the accuracy of the model and the depth of its application. This paper earns application points by giving each stream specific, dated evidence rather than general statements, and the margin notes mark where the evidence carries the argument. A separate limits section addresses the critique element that doctoral policy courses often grade, because applying a model is not the same as accepting it. The nurses' role section connects the analysis to practice, which rubrics tend to reward under relevance or implications. Organization comes from following the model's own structure. APA credit depends on citing government data correctly, including agency authors, and on keeping statistics consistent with their sources throughout.
Common DNP 820 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
The most common mistake is writing a history of a law and labeling paragraphs with the model's terms afterward. Start with the model, then show each stream with evidence, and explain how they joined. Students also confuse the policy stream with the politics stream; the first is about available solutions, the second about mood, elections and interest groups. Another frequent problem is picking a policy so large, such as the Affordable Care Act, that the paper cannot go deep on any stream. Choose a narrow change with a clear window. Papers also skip the model's limits, which weakens the critique. Finally, check every figure against its source, since maternal health statistics are revised often and graders do notice outdated numbers.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More DNP 820 and DNP sample papers
- DNP 820 Module 2: Health Care Economics and Cost Drivers
- DNP 820 Module 3: A Federal Law and Advanced Practice
- DNP 820 Module 4: Full Practice Authority Debate
- DNP 820 Module 5: The Regulatory Process and a Public Comment
- DNP 820 Module 6: Ethics of Allocating a Scarce Resource
- DNP 820 Module 7: Advocacy Brief to a State Legislator
- DNP 820 Module 8: Complete Policy Analysis With Recommendation
- DNP 850A Module 7: Stakeholders, Site Support and Feasibility
- DNP845 Module 3: Grand vs Middle-Range Theory Paper
- DNP 851A Module 2: Educating the Staff Who Deliver It
- DNP 840 Module 6: Financial Statements and Ratio Analysis
DNP 820 Module 1 questions, answered
What does DNP 820 Module 1 usually ask for?
Aspen's DNP 820 description includes critiquing the policy process, so applying a policy process model to one law or proposal is a typical first assignment. Check your classroom for the prompt.
What is Kingdon's multiple streams model?
A model in which policy change happens when the problem, policy and politics streams converge, opening a window that policy entrepreneurs use to move a proposal onto the decision agenda.
What did the postpartum Medicaid extension do?
It allowed states to extend Medicaid and CHIP coverage for postpartum individuals from 60 days to 12 months, first as a temporary option in 2021 and then permanently from 2023.
Where can I find a free DNP 820 Module 1 sample paper?
This page prints one in full: Kingdon's multiple streams applied to the postpartum Medicaid extension, title page first and references last, with a margin note beside each section. You can read it without paying. To get one aimed at your own policy, send your prompt through the form.
Which policy model works best for DNP 820 Module 1?
Kingdon's multiple streams model suits a paper about how an issue reached the agenda, as this example shows. The stages heuristic suits a paper that follows a policy from formulation to evaluation. Use the model your prompt names, or the one that fits your policy's story.