HCA 310 Module 2 Registering a Patient and Building the Record Example

Reviewed by Douglas Renshaw, MBA Aspen University Updated September 2026

This HCA 310 Module 2 sample paper walks through registering a composite new patient in an orthopedic practice's electronic health record and shows how each step builds the chart. It was written for HIPAA and Electronic Health Records, Aspen University's course that trains future users of electronic record programs in the health care administration program. The patient, a 58-year-old librarian with right knee pain, is registered only after a search for an existing record. A nine-row table lists the fields, from legal name and date of birth to referring physician, and why each matters. Identity checks, eligibility, consents, clinical intake, a study on data standardization and patient matching, duplicate reports, privacy at the counter, minors and proxies, missing information and online pre-registration complete the paper.

CourseHCA 310 HIPAA and Electronic Health Records
ModuleModule 2
Paper typeEHR registration exercise
LengthAbout 1,031 words, 6 pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAspen University
ProgramHealth Care Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HCA 310 Module 2

1

The First Screen: Registering a New Patient and Building the Electronic Record

Student Name

Health Care Administration Program, Aspen University

HCA 310: HIPAA and Electronic Health Records

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

What this page is doingThe title stresses that everything in the record starts at registration. APA 7 student title page.
2

The First Screen: Registering a New Patient and Building the Electronic Record

Every electronic record begins with registration. The demographic, insurance and consent information entered at the first visit follows the patient through every later encounter, claim and message. Errors here spread everywhere: a wrong birth date can merge two patients' records, and wrong insurance can deny every claim. This paper walks through the registration of a composite new patient at an orthopedic practice and explains how each step builds the record.

The Patient

Ms. V., a composite 58-year-old librarian, calls for an appointment for right knee pain after her primary care physician referred her. Her coverage is an employer-sponsored PPO. She speaks English and prefers text messages for reminders.

Search Before Creating

Before creating a new record, the registrar searches for an existing one using name, date of birth and phone number. Patients may have been seen years ago under a maiden name or a nickname. Creating a second record for someone already in the system produces a duplicate, splitting the patient's history across two charts. The registrar also searches for similar names to avoid attaching a new patient to someone else's record.

What this page is doingStarting with the search step explains the source of duplicate records before any data are entered.
3

Registration Fields

The table shows the main fields and why each matters.

FieldExampleWhy it matters
Legal nameAs on insurance cardClaims and identity matching
Date of birthVerified with IDMatching and safety checks
Sex and gender identityAs patient reportsRespectful care, correct screening
Address and phoneCurrent, with preferred contactReminders, statements
Preferred languageEnglishInterpreter needs
Insurance and subscriberPlan, member ID, subscriberEligibility and claims
GuarantorPerson responsible for billStatements
Emergency contactName, relation, phoneUrgent situations
Referring and primary physicianNames and identifiersReports and referral rules

Identity Verification

At her first visit, Ms. V. shows photo identification and her insurance card, both scanned into the record. Many practices also take a photograph for the chart, which helps staff confirm identity at later visits. The registrar checks that the name on the card matches the name entered exactly, including hyphens and middle initials.

Insurance and Eligibility

The registrar enters the plan, member ID and subscriber, then runs an electronic eligibility check that confirms active coverage and shows the specialist copay. Getting this right now prevents denials later; when one children's hospital redesigned the form its registrars used, blank and partial entries fell by 67% and denied claims fell with them (Kovach & Borikar, 2018).

Consents and Acknowledgments

Ms. V. signs a consent to treatment, a financial policy and an acknowledgment that she received the notice of privacy practices. She lists her husband as someone who may receive information about her care, and she agrees to text reminders. These choices are recorded in structured fields so staff can see them at a glance; the privacy notice she acknowledged explains how the practice may use and share her information (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2022).

Starting the Clinical Record

Before she sees the surgeon, a medical assistant completes intake: medications, allergies, past surgeries, family history, smoking status, height, weight and blood pressure. Ms. V. completed a history questionnaire through the portal before the visit, which the assistant reviews with her. These entries seed the problem list, medication list and allergy list that every later clinician will rely on.

How Records Get Mismatched

Mismatches happen when two people share a name and birth date, when data are entered inconsistently or when a record is created without searching first. Standardizing how data are entered helps matching; a study of several datasets found that standardizing address and last name improved matching sensitivity, although overall accuracy was unchanged because specificity fell (Grannis et al., 2019). Consistent entry rules at the front desk are a practical form of standardization.

Front Desk Quality Checks

The practice runs a weekly report of possible duplicate records, which the office manager reviews and merges when confirmed. Registrars follow written rules: legal name as on the card, no nicknames in the name field, addresses in a standard format and phone numbers verified at each visit. New registrars have their first 50 registrations audited.

Privacy at Registration

Registration happens at a counter where others may overhear. Staff ask patients to write or type sensitive information rather than say it aloud, turn screens away from the waiting room and hand back identification cards promptly. Patients may request that the practice contact them at a particular phone number or address, and the record notes this preference.

Updating at Every Visit

Registration is not a one-time event. At each visit, staff confirm address, phone, insurance and emergency contact, and ask about changes. A patient who changed jobs may have new insurance, and a patient who moved may miss reminders. Keeping the record current protects both care and revenue.

Registering Minors and Proxies

Registration differs for minors. The guarantor is usually a parent, and consent to treat comes from a parent or guardian except where state law lets minors consent to certain services themselves. For patients who need help, such as older adults with memory loss, the record notes any health care power of attorney and which family members may receive information. Portal proxy access is set up only with the proper permission.

When Information Is Missing

Some patients arrive without insurance cards or identification, or cannot provide a complete history. The registrar creates the record with what is available, flags missing items and follows up before the claim is sent. Emergency care is never delayed for paperwork. A registration checklist on the screen shows which required fields remain incomplete.

Registration Before the Visit

Many patients now complete registration online before they arrive, entering demographics, insurance and history through the portal. Staff review these entries at check-in rather than typing them from scratch, which saves time and reduces transcription errors, but they still verify identity and insurance in person.

Conclusion

Registering a new patient builds the foundation of the electronic record. Searching before creating a record prevents duplicates, careful identity and insurance checks prevent mismatches and denials, recorded consents and preferences guide communication, and clinical intake seeds the lists every clinician uses. Consistent entry rules and regular duplicate checks keep that foundation sound.

References

Grannis, S. J., Xu, H., Vest, J. R., Kasthurirathne, S., Bo, N., Moscovitch, B., Torkzadeh, R., & Rising, J. (2019). Evaluating the effect of data standardization and validation on patient matching accuracy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(5), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy191

Kovach, J. V., & Borikar, S. (2018). Enhancing financial performance: An application of Lean Six Sigma to reduce insurance claim denials. Quality Management in Health Care, 27(3), 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000175

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2022). Summary of the HIPAA privacy rule. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html

What the HCA 310 Module 2 instructions ask for

The HCA 310 catalog entry says the course trains future users of electronic record programs, and with module wording reserved for enrolled students, registration was chosen as the first hands-on task for this example. Registration exercises usually ask you to enter a patient into a practice system and explain each field, sometimes with screenshots from course software. Check whether your prompt expects screenshots, a narrative or both. If your course software has its own fields, follow them, but explain why each matters in terms of claims, safety and privacy. Always describe the search for an existing record first, since graders look for awareness of duplicate records and the problems they cause.

How the HCA 310 Module 2 example is put together

About 1,030 words fill sixteen sections, with a nine-row field table. After introducing the patient, the paper explains why the registrar searches before creating a record. The field table follows, then sections on identity verification, insurance and eligibility, consents and acknowledgments, and clinical intake. How records get mismatched is supported by a patient-matching study. Front desk quality checks, privacy at registration, updating at every visit, minors and proxies, missing information and pre-registration online round out the body. A note beside the search step explains that duplicates start there. Each section ends with what goes wrong when that step is skipped, which keeps the walk-through practical.

Where the marks sit in the HCA 310 Module 2 rubric

Registration exercises tend to be judged on completeness of fields, accuracy of process, awareness of errors and privacy. Every major field is listed with a reason. The process follows a sensible order: search, verify, enter, consent, intake. Error awareness appears in the sections on duplicates, mismatches and quality checks, supported by a data standardization study and a registration improvement study, both cited in APA style. Privacy shows in the counter practices and recorded communication preferences. Graders also reward attention to special cases such as minors, which this paper includes. Clear, ordered headings mirror the steps a registrar actually follows, which helps graders check completeness. A note on updating information at every visit shows that registration continues after the first day.

HCA 310 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost marks

A frequent weakness is listing fields without explaining why they matter. Tie each field to claims, safety or communication. Students also skip the search step and never mention duplicates. Another common gap is forgetting consents and privacy preferences, which the record must capture. If your course uses EHR practice software, match its terms. Our tutors can go through your registration steps with you and check that nothing required for billing or safety is missing before you submit. Also describe how you would handle a patient who arrives without identification or an insurance card, since real front desks face this daily. Keep your screenshots, if required, cropped to fictional data only.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HCA 310 and Health Care Administration sample papers

HCA 310 Module 2 questions, answered

What does HCA 310 Module 2 usually ask for?

Aspen's HCA 310 description trains future users of EHR programs, so registering a patient and building the record is a typical exercise. Follow your Aspen classroom prompt.

What is a duplicate medical record?

A second record created for a patient who already has one, which splits the patient's history across two charts.

Why search before registering a new patient?

To find any existing record under another name or spelling and avoid creating a duplicate.

Where can I find a free HCA 310 Module 2 sample paper?

This page shows the whole EHR registration walk-through, including the nine-field table. It is the second HCA 310 sample.

How do duplicate records happen in HCA 310 Module 2?

When staff create a new record without finding the patient's existing one, often because of a name change, nickname or typing error.