| Course | PAC 610 Psychopharmacology |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Drug class paper |
| Length | About 1,068 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Psychology and Addiction Studies |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PAC 610 Module 3
Three Weeks Is Not a Trial: What the Evidence Says About Antidepressants for a Client in Early Recovery
Student Name
Psychology and Addiction Studies Program, Aspen University
PAC 610: Psychopharmacology
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Three Weeks Is Not a Trial: What the Evidence Says About Antidepressants for a Client in Early Recovery
Lena, a thirty-four-year-old client at Ridgeview Recovery Center, the Knoxville outpatient program created for these papers, had been free of opioids for four months and taking buprenorphine. Her low mood had outlasted withdrawal by many weeks, and the program's nurse practitioner diagnosed major depression and started sertraline. Three weeks later, Lena told her counselor she wanted to stop: "I feel the same. It doesn't work on me, nothing ever does." This paper reviews what antidepressants are, how well they work and what a counselor can reasonably do in Lena's situation.
The Main Classes
| Class | Examples | How it acts | Common concerns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) | Sertraline, escitalopram, fluoxetine | Block the serotonin transporter, so serotonin stays longer in the synapse | Nausea, sexual side effects, early restlessness |
| Serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) | Venlafaxine, duloxetine | Block reuptake of both serotonin and norepinephrine | Similar to SSRIs; raised blood pressure at higher doses; marked discontinuation symptoms |
| Bupropion | Bupropion | Blocks reuptake of norepinephrine and dopamine | Insomnia, lowered seizure threshold; little sexual dysfunction |
| Mirtazapine | Mirtazapine | Blocks certain receptors that normally restrain serotonin and norepinephrine release | Sedation, increased appetite and weight |
| Tricyclics | Amitriptyline, nortriptyline | Block reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine and many other receptors | Dry mouth, constipation, dizziness; dangerous in overdose |
How Well They Work
Cipriani et al. (2018) conducted a network meta-analysis of 522 randomized trials involving more than 116,000 adults with major depression, comparing 21 antidepressants with placebo and with each other. Every one of the 21 drugs was more effective than placebo at producing a response over about eight weeks. The odds of responding ranged from roughly twice those on placebo for the most effective drug, amitriptyline, to about one third higher for the least effective, reboxetine. The drugs also differed in acceptability, measured by how many people stopped taking them for any reason. Several commonly used drugs, including escitalopram and sertraline, combined relatively good effectiveness with relatively good acceptability. The authors cautioned that the average differences between drugs were modest and that most trials were short.
When the First Drug Does Not Work
Rush et al. (2006) reported the main outcomes of STAR*D, a large study that followed several thousand outpatients with depression through up to four steps of treatment in ordinary clinical settings. Everyone began on citalopram. Those who did not remit could move to another drug, a combination or, at the second step, cognitive therapy. About 37 percent remitted at the first step, about 31 percent of those who continued at the second step, and around 13 to 14 percent at each of the third and fourth steps. Over all four steps, about two thirds of participants who stayed in the study remitted. Two lessons stand out. Not responding to one drug does not mean that no treatment will help. And remission became harder with each step, while relapse became more likely for those who needed more steps.
STAR*D also showed that remission took time. Many participants who eventually remitted did so only after six weeks or more on an adequate dose, which bears directly on Lena's three weeks.
Severity and the Placebo Question
Fournier et al. (2010) pooled data from individual patients in six trials comparing antidepressants with placebo. In people with mild or moderate depression, the advantage of medication over placebo was small and might not be clinically meaningful. In people with very severe depression, the advantage was substantial. Part of the reason is that people with milder depression often improve substantially with placebo and the attention that comes with a trial. This finding does not mean antidepressants fail in milder depression; it means the added benefit of the drug is harder to detect, and that psychotherapy and other approaches deserve equal consideration.
Side Effects and Stopping
Side effects are a major reason people stop antidepressants, and they often arrive before any benefit does. Nausea, headache and jitteriness tend to appear in the first week or two and often fade. Sexual side effects are common with SSRIs and SNRIs, tend to persist and are often not mentioned unless someone asks. Stopping some antidepressants suddenly, particularly those with short half-lives such as paroxetine and venlafaxine, can cause discontinuation symptoms, including dizziness, irritability, flu-like feelings and electric-shock sensations, which a client may mistake for relapse or for a sign that the drug was harmful. For these reasons, a decision to stop is best made with the prescriber, who can taper the dose.
Depression Alongside Substance Use
Depression is common among people in addiction treatment, and some low mood lifts with weeks of abstinence as the effects of intoxication and withdrawal fade. Lena's prescriber waited until her depression had lasted well past withdrawal before diagnosing it, which supports treating it as a separate condition. Two practical points follow. Alcohol and other sedating drugs can worsen depression and interact with some antidepressants. And treating depression may support recovery, since persistent low mood is a common reason people return to use.
What the Counselor Can Do
Lena's counselor cannot change her medication and should not tell her to keep taking it against her wishes. She can do several things within her role. She can share what the research shows about timing: that antidepressants usually take several weeks to show their full effect and that three weeks is early. She can ask about side effects, since unpleasant effects without benefit are a common reason people stop, and many can be addressed by the prescriber. She can point out that Lena's belief that "nothing ever works" may itself be part of the depression. She can explain that if sertraline does not help after a fair trial, the STAR*D results suggest other options may. And with Lena's permission, she can arrange for her to talk with the nurse practitioner before stopping, so that any change is planned and does not cause discontinuation symptoms.
Conclusion
Antidepressants act mainly by increasing the availability of serotonin, norepinephrine or both, and all the commonly used drugs outperform placebo for adults with major depression, though by modest margins on average and more clearly in severe depression. Benefits usually take weeks, and failure on a first drug does not predict failure on all. For a client in early recovery, depression that persists beyond withdrawal deserves treatment, and the counselor's task is to support a fair trial and an informed conversation with the prescriber.
References
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Atkinson, L. Z., Ogawa, Y., Leucht, S., Ruhe, H. G., Turner, E. H., Higgins, J. P. T., Egger, M., Takeshima, N., Hayasaka, Y., Imai, H., Shinohara, K., Tajika, A., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Geddes, J. R. (2018). Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet, 391(10128), 1357-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7
Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Dimidjian, S., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., & Fawcett, J. (2010). Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: A patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA, 303(1), 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1943
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., McGrath, P. J., Rosenbaum, J. F., Sackeim, H. A., Kupfer, D. J., Luther, J., & Fava, M. (2006). Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: A STAR*D report. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(11), 1905-1917. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905
PAC 610 Module 3 instructions, in plain terms
Antidepressants are the third module of PAC 610, and the usual task is to set out the classes, how they act and what the evidence says about their effectiveness and limits. Treat the Module 3 instructions in your Aspen course as the final word; Lena is a teaching invention. Explain each class's mechanism accurately. Summarize the effectiveness evidence from large reviews, with numbers. Address how long a fair trial takes and what happens if the first drug fails. Discuss severity, side effects and stopping. Consider depression that occurs alongside substance use. Keep the counselor's role clear, and cite every source in APA 7 with full details. If your prompt includes a client, show how the evidence would shape a conversation without turning it into medical advice, and say what the counselor would pass on to the prescriber.
Inside the PAC 610 Module 3 example
A client three weeks into sertraline at the composite Knoxville program wants to stop. The paper's five-row table covers SSRIs, SNRIs, bupropion, mirtazapine and tricyclics. Cipriani and colleagues' Lancet network meta-analysis supplies the comparative evidence across 522 trials. The STAR*D report in the American Journal of Psychiatry gives remission rates for each of four steps, with about two in three patients remitting by the end. Fournier and colleagues' JAMA analysis explains why mild depression shows less benefit over placebo. The counselor's section covers timing, side effect questions and a plan to bring the client's concerns to her prescriber. A short section on depression after withdrawal explains why the diagnosis was made only once low mood had lasted well beyond it.
Reading the PAC 610 Module 3 grading rubric
Antidepressant papers score well when mechanisms are right, evidence comes with numbers and balanced discussion of benefits and limits. This example explains each class precisely in the table. It reports large studies with their scale and main findings rather than citing single trials. It presents the evidence on severity fairly, neither dismissing antidepressants nor overselling them. The STAR*D section explains what failure on a first drug means. Depression with substance use is addressed directly. The counselor's role is concrete and within scope, focused on helping the client have a fair trial and an informed conversation with her prescriber. The client's hopelessness is read as a possible symptom, which shows clinical thinking beyond the drug facts.
Common PAC 610 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Antidepressant papers often present them as either miracle cures or placebos. Report what large reviews show, with numbers. Explain that benefits usually take weeks and that a first drug's failure does not mean all will fail. Mention side effects and discontinuation symptoms honestly. Address substance use: depression that persists after several weeks of abstinence differs from depression caused by intoxication or withdrawal. Keep within scope; support the client in talking with the prescriber rather than offering advice about stopping or switching. Check every mechanism in the table against a pharmacology source before you submit, since class descriptions are easy to get slightly wrong. Report study sizes and time frames along with results; a finding from eight-week trials says less about long-term use than one from a year of follow-up.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PAC 610 and Psychology and Addiction Studies sample papers
- PAC 610 Module 1: Neurons, Neurotransmitters and History
- PAC 610 Module 2: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
- PAC 610 Module 4: Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers
- PAC 610 Module 5: Anxiolytics, Hypnotics and Stimulants
- PAC 610 Module 6: Medications for Substance Use Disorders
- PAC 610 Module 7: Side Effects, Interactions and Adherence
- PAC 610 Module 8: Clinical Applications and Current Issues
- PAC 414 Module 2: Recognizing Signs of Abuse
- PAC 115 Module 6: Terminology in Addiction Studies
- SBS 200 Module 6: Middle Adulthood
- PAC 420 Module 3: Planning and Forming a Group
PAC 610 Module 3 questions, answered
What does PAC 610 Module 3 usually ask for?
Aspen's PAC 610 covers antidepressants in this module, so a paper on classes, mechanisms, effectiveness and limits is typical. Read your Module 3 prompt.
Do antidepressants work better than placebo?
Cipriani and colleagues found all 21 antidepressants studied more effective than placebo for adults with major depression, though the average advantage was modest.
What happens if the first antidepressant does not work?
In STAR*D, many patients who did not remit on the first drug did so on later steps, and about two in three remitted over up to four steps.
Where can I find a free PAC 610 Module 3 sample paper?
This page has the full paper: antidepressant classes in a table, evidence from three major studies and a counselor's role in a fair trial.
Does depression severity affect antidepressant benefit?
Fournier and colleagues found the advantage over placebo small in mild to moderate depression and substantial in very severe depression.