| Course | PAC 610 Psychopharmacology |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Drug class paper with cases |
| Length | About 1,081 words, 6 pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | Aspen University |
| Program | Psychology and Addiction Studies |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for PAC 610 Module 6
Not Trading One Drug for Another: The Evidence for Medications in Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders
Student Name
Psychology and Addiction Studies Program, Aspen University
PAC 610: Psychopharmacology
Instructor Name
Month Day, Year
Not Trading One Drug for Another: The Evidence for Medications in Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders
Tyler and Monique, two clients of the made-up Ridgeview Recovery Center in Knoxville, bring the questions of this module into focus. Tyler, twenty-nine, has taken buprenorphine for a year after several overdoses. He works, pays rent and has not used heroin in eleven months. His parents, who paid for two residential stays that did not last, want him to "get off drugs completely" and have been urging him to taper. Monique, forty-five, has an alcohol use disorder and has been abstinent for three weeks after detoxification; the nurse practitioner has suggested naltrexone, and Monique is unsure. This paper reviews the medications and evidence that bear on their decisions.
The Medications
| Medication | Disorder | How it acts | Key practical points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methadone | Opioid use disorder | Full opioid agonist with a long half-life | Daily dosing at a licensed program at first; risk of overdose early in treatment |
| Buprenorphine, often with naloxone | Opioid use disorder | Partial opioid agonist; ceiling on breathing suppression | Prescribed in office settings; must begin when mild withdrawal has started |
| Extended-release naltrexone | Opioid and alcohol use disorders | Blocks opioid receptors for about a month | Requires full opioid detoxification before the first injection |
| Oral naltrexone | Alcohol use disorder | Blocks opioid receptors, reducing reward from drinking | Daily pill; avoid with opioid pain medicines |
| Acamprosate | Alcohol use disorder | Thought to restore balance in glutamate signaling | Taken three times daily; dose adjusted for kidney function |
| Disulfiram | Alcohol use disorder | Causes an unpleasant reaction to alcohol | Works only if taken; little support in blinded trials |
Opioid Medications: Retention and Use
Mattick et al. (2014) reviewed randomized trials of buprenorphine maintenance for opioid dependence in a Cochrane review. Compared with placebo, buprenorphine at medium and high doses kept more people in treatment and, at high doses, reduced illicit opioid use. Compared with methadone at flexible doses, buprenorphine retained somewhat fewer people in treatment, while the two performed similarly on reducing opioid use among those who stayed. The authors concluded that both are effective maintenance treatments, with methadone holding a modest advantage in retention.
Opioid Medications and Death
Sordo et al. (2017) pooled cohort studies following people with opioid dependence in and out of methadone and buprenorphine treatment. All-cause mortality was several times higher out of treatment than in it. The first weeks after leaving treatment were particularly dangerous, as was the first month of starting methadone. The authors concluded that keeping people in treatment longer could prevent many deaths. For Tyler, whose tolerance would fall after a taper, this evidence is directly relevant.
Naltrexone Versus Buprenorphine
Lee et al. (2018) randomly assigned adults entering inpatient detoxification to extended-release naltrexone or buprenorphine-naloxone and followed them for twenty-four weeks. Starting naltrexone proved the major hurdle: because it requires full detoxification first, a substantial share of those assigned to it never received their first injection, whereas nearly everyone assigned to buprenorphine began treatment. Counting every person randomized, the naltrexone arm relapsed more often. Among those who did start their assigned medication, relapse rates were similar. The trial shows that both medications can work and that the practical difficulty of starting naltrexone matters greatly.
Why So Few People Receive Them
Despite this evidence, many people with opioid use disorder never receive methadone or buprenorphine, and fewer still with alcohol use disorder receive medication. Barriers include too few prescribers, rules that require daily clinic visits for methadone, stigma within treatment programs and among families, and the belief, held by some clients themselves, that recovery on medication is not real recovery. Counselors work at the point where several of these barriers meet: they hear clients' doubts, meet their families and shape the culture of programs.
Alcohol Medications
Jonas et al. (2014) reviewed medications for alcohol use disorders in outpatient settings. Each of the two main drugs, acamprosate and naltrexone tablets at 50 milligrams a day, lowered the chance of drinking again. The authors estimated that about twelve people would need to take acamprosate, and about twenty naltrexone, for one to avoid any return to drinking; for naltrexone, about twelve people would need treatment for one to avoid a return to heavy drinking. Direct comparisons found no clear difference between the two. Evidence for disulfiram in well-controlled trials was weak. The authors noted that these medications are used by only a small fraction of people with alcohol use disorders.
The Substitution Objection
Tyler's parents voice a common belief: that buprenorphine merely trades one addiction for another. The distinction between physical dependence and addiction answers it. Physical dependence, the body's adaptation that causes withdrawal when a drug stops, occurs with many medications, including some for blood pressure and depression. Addiction involves compulsive use despite harm, loss of control and a life organized around obtaining and using a drug. At a stable dose, buprenorphine relieves craving and withdrawal without producing the cycle of intoxication and withdrawal that drove Tyler's heroin use. His working, paying rent and staying alive are the signs of recovery.
Applying the Evidence to Tyler
Tyler's counselor should not tell him to stay on buprenorphine or to taper; that decision belongs to Tyler and his prescriber. But the counselor can make sure the decision is informed. With his permission, the counselor can meet with Tyler and his parents to explain the difference between dependence and addiction and share what the research shows about mortality after leaving treatment. The counselor can explore what Tyler himself wants. If he chooses to taper someday, it should be slow, planned with the prescriber and paired with overdose prevention, including naloxone at home.
Applying the Evidence to Monique
Monique is a reasonable candidate for naltrexone or acamprosate, and the counselor can help her weigh them with the nurse practitioner. She should know that the benefits are real but modest and that the medication works best alongside counseling and support. If she ever needs opioid pain medication, she must tell the prescriber she takes naltrexone. Her counselor can also address any sense that taking medication means she has failed at recovery, since the evidence shows it is a tool many people use successfully.
Conclusion
Medications for opioid use disorder keep people in treatment, reduce illicit use and, most importantly, reduce death; naltrexone can work but is harder to start. Medications for alcohol use disorder offer modest, real benefits. Counselors can help clients and families understand this evidence, answer the substitution objection with the distinction between dependence and addiction and support informed decisions made with prescribers.
References
Jonas, D. E., Amick, H. R., Feltner, C., Bobashev, G., Thomas, K., Wines, R., Kim, M. M., Shanahan, E., Gass, C. E., Rowe, C. J., & Garbutt, J. C. (2014). Pharmacotherapy for adults with alcohol use disorders in outpatient settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 311(18), 1889-1900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.3628
Lee, J. D., Nunes, E. V., Novo, P., Bachrach, K., Bailey, G. L., Bhatt, S., Farkas, S., Fishman, M., Gauthier, P., Hodgkins, C. C., King, J., Lindblad, R., Liu, D., Matthews, A. G., May, J., Peavy, K. M., Ross, S., Salazar, D., Schkolnik, P., ... Rotrosen, J. (2018). Comparative effectiveness of extended-release naltrexone versus buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid relapse prevention (X:BOT): A multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 391(10118), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32812-X
Mattick, R. P., Breen, C., Kimber, J., & Davoli, M. (2014). Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (2), Article CD002207. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4
Sordo, L., Barrio, G., Bravo, M. J., Indave, B. I., Degenhardt, L., Wiessing, L., Ferri, M., & Pastor-Barriuso, R. (2017). Mortality risk during and after opioid substitution treatment: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ, 357, j1550. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1550
Reading the PAC 610 Module 6 assignment instructions
Medications for addiction are the sixth module of PAC 610, and the prompt generally wants the options for opioid and alcohol use disorders laid out and the evidence behind them. Follow the Module 6 instructions in your Aspen course; these clients are invented. Explain how each medication acts. Report evidence on retention, use, mortality and drinking with numbers. Compare options fairly, including practical barriers. Address stigma and the belief that agonist treatment is substituting one addiction for another. Apply the evidence to clients and families. Keep the counselor in scope, and reference each study in APA 7, Cochrane reviews included. Report outcomes beyond abstinence, such as retention and death, and explain what each study measured so readers can compare them fairly.
How the PAC 610 Module 6 example is put together
Two composite clients anchor the paper: Tyler, stable on buprenorphine with a family urging him to quit, and Monique, deciding about naltrexone. A six-row table covers methadone, buprenorphine, extended-release naltrexone, acamprosate, oral naltrexone and disulfiram. The Cochrane review by Mattick and colleagues compares buprenorphine with placebo and methadone. Death rates on and off treatment come from the cohort studies pooled by Sordo and colleagues. Lee and colleagues' Lancet trial explains why starting naltrexone is harder. Jonas and colleagues' JAMA review gives numbers needed to treat for alcohol medications. The counselor's section addresses the family's objection directly with evidence. It also prepares the second client for practical points, such as telling any future prescriber that she takes naltrexone before receiving opioid pain medicine.
PAC 610 Module 6 rubric: what earns full marks
Papers on addiction medications earn credit for accurate mechanisms, evidence reported with numbers and a clear response to stigma. This example compares medications on outcomes that matter, including death, rather than only abstinence. It explains the difficulty of starting naltrexone and why intention-to-treat results differ from results among those who started. Numbers needed to treat make alcohol medication evidence concrete. The paper answers the substitution objection by explaining the difference between addiction and physical dependence. The counselor's role, educating families and supporting clients' choices, is clearly within scope. The table lets a reader compare six medications quickly, and the prose explains which outcomes each was tested on and how strong that evidence is.
PAC 610 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost marks
Addiction medication papers often present abstinence-based treatment and medication as rivals. Present them as complementary. Report mortality evidence, which is often the strongest argument for opioid medications. Explain physical dependence versus addiction clearly. Be fair to naltrexone, which suits some clients, while noting its induction barrier. Do not overstate alcohol medications; their benefits are real but modest. Remember that the counselor supports and educates but does not decide on dosing or tapering. Pay attention to wording too; terms such as "clean" and "substitution" carry judgment that can push clients away from treatment. When families are involved, plan how to share evidence respectfully; parents who paid for failed treatment often have understandable fears that deserve a hearing before any facts are offered.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official Aspen University document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More PAC 610 and Psychology and Addiction Studies sample papers
- PAC 610 Module 1: Neurons, Neurotransmitters and History
- PAC 610 Module 2: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
- PAC 610 Module 3: Antidepressants
- PAC 610 Module 4: Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers
- PAC 610 Module 5: Anxiolytics, Hypnotics and Stimulants
- PAC 610 Module 7: Side Effects, Interactions and Adherence
- PAC 610 Module 8: Clinical Applications and Current Issues
- PAC 411 Module 6: Human Behavior and the Social Environment
- PAC 102 Module 1: Substance Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults
- PAC 230 Module 8: Reducing Adverse Health Outcomes in Families
- PAC 330 Module 3: Nicotine and Cannabis
PAC 610 Module 6 questions, answered
What does PAC 610 Module 6 usually ask for?
Aspen's PAC 610 covers medications for substance use disorders in this module, so a paper on opioid and alcohol medications and their evidence is typical. Check your Module 6 prompt.
Is buprenorphine just replacing one drug with another?
No. It produces physical dependence, as many medications do, but at stable doses it does not produce the compulsive use and harm that define addiction, and it greatly reduces death risk.
How much do opioid medications reduce death?
Sordo and colleagues found all-cause mortality several times higher out of methadone or buprenorphine treatment than in it, with the weeks after leaving especially dangerous.
Where can I find a free PAC 610 Module 6 sample paper?
The full paper is on this page: medications for opioid and alcohol use disorders, the evidence for each and two client cases.
Do medications for alcohol use disorder work?
Yes, modestly. In Jonas and colleagues' review, both acamprosate and naltrexone pills lowered the chance of drinking again; about twelve people need acamprosate for one to avoid any drinking.